DIGITAL SCANS, COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS, MAY EXPEDITE FABRICATION TIME FOR FULL-ARCH IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES WHILE MAINTAINING A COMPARABLE LEVEL OF MARGINAL BONE LOSS

Clinical outcomes of digital scans versus conventional impressions for implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. I. A., Spin-Neto, R., Sesma, N., & da Silva, E. V. F. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2023). Not reported. Systematic review with n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of evidence-based dental practice 2024-06, Vol.24 (2), p.101987, Article 101987
Main Authors: Alqutaibi, Ahmed Yaseen, Alghauli, Mohammed Ahmed, Aboalrejal, Afaf Noman
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging
CAD-CAM
Computer-Aided Design
Conventional impressions
Dental Impression Technique
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
Digital scan
Humans
marginal bone loss
MBL
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Systematic Reviews as Topic
Time
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Clinical outcomes of digital scans versus conventional impressions for implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. I. A., Spin-Neto, R., Sesma, N., & da Silva, E. V. F. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2023). Not reported. Systematic review with network meta-analysis of data.
ISSN:1532-3382
1532-3390
1532-3390
DOI:10.1016/j.jebdp.2024.101987