Loading…

Nociceptors are functionally male or female: from mouse to monkey to man

The prevalence of many pain conditions often differs between sexes. In addition to such quantitative distinctions, sexual dimorphism may also be qualitative reflecting differences in mechanisms that promote pain in men and women. A major factor that influences the likelihood of pain perception is th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain (London, England : 1878) England : 1878), 2024-12, Vol.147 (12), p.4280
Main Authors: Stratton, Harrison, Lee, Grace, Dolatyari, Mahdi, Ghetti, Andre, Cotta, Tamara, Mitchell, Stefanie, Yue, Xu, Ibrahim, Mohab, Dumaire, Nicolas, Salih, Lyuba, Moutal, Aubin, François-Moutal, Liberty, Martin, Laurent, Navratilova, Edita, Porreca, Frank
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-acbd437adf6d7e83a303138ef8f21933f0b27c8d00996e2a5ad934056687bd473
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4280
container_title Brain (London, England : 1878)
container_volume 147
creator Stratton, Harrison
Lee, Grace
Dolatyari, Mahdi
Ghetti, Andre
Cotta, Tamara
Mitchell, Stefanie
Yue, Xu
Ibrahim, Mohab
Dumaire, Nicolas
Salih, Lyuba
Moutal, Aubin
François-Moutal, Liberty
Martin, Laurent
Navratilova, Edita
Porreca, Frank
description The prevalence of many pain conditions often differs between sexes. In addition to such quantitative distinctions, sexual dimorphism may also be qualitative reflecting differences in mechanisms that promote pain in men and women. A major factor that influences the likelihood of pain perception is the threshold for activation of nociceptors. Peripheral nociceptor sensitization has been demonstrated to be clinically relevant in many pain conditions. Whether peripheral nociceptor sensitization can occur in a sexually dimorphic fashion, however, has not been extensively studied. To address this fundamental knowledge gap, we used patch clamp electrophysiology to evaluate the excitability of dorsal root ganglion neurons from male or female rodents, non-human primates, and humans following exposure to putative sensitizing agents. Previous studies from our laboratory, and others, have shown that prolactin promotes female-selective pain responses in rodents. Consistent with these observations, dorsal root ganglion neurons from female, but not male, mice were selectively sensitized by exposure to prolactin. The sensitizing action of prolactin was also confirmed in dorsal root ganglion neurons from a female macaque monkey. Critically, neurons recovered from female, but not male, human donors were also selectively sensitized by prolactin. In the course of studies of sleep and pain, we unexpectedly observed that an orexin antagonist could normalize pain responses in male animals. We found that orexin B produced sensitization of male, but not female, mouse, macaque, and human dorsal root ganglion neurons. Consistent with functional responses, increased prolactin receptor and orexin receptor 2 expression was observed in female and male mouse dorsal root ganglia, respectively. Immunohistochemical interrogation of cultured human sensory neurons and whole dorsal root ganglia also suggested increased prolactin receptor expression in females and orexin receptor 2 expression in males. These data reveal a functional double dissociation of nociceptor sensitization by sex, which is conserved across species and is likely directly relevant to human pain conditions. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of functional sexual dimorphism in human sensory neurons. Patient sex is currently not a common consideration for the choice of pain therapy. Precision medicine, based on patient sex could improve therapeutic outcomes by selectively targeting mechanisms promoting pain in
doi_str_mv 10.1093/brain/awae179
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064580470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3064580470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-acbd437adf6d7e83a303138ef8f21933f0b27c8d00996e2a5ad934056687bd473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kL9PwzAQhS0EoqUwsiKPLKHnOHFsNlQBRapggTm6OGcpkMTFToX635P-gOne8N3T08fYtYA7AUbOq4BNP8cfJFGYEzYVmYIkFbk6ZVMAUIk2OUzYRYyfACKTqTpnE6l1ajSIKVu-ettYWg8-RI6BuNv0dmh8j2275R22xH3gjnbpnrvgO975TSQ--DH0X7TdJ-wv2ZnDNtLV8c7Yx9Pj-2KZrN6eXxYPq8SO-4YEbVVnssDaqbogLVGCFFKT0y4VRkoHVVpYXQMYoyjFHGsjM8iV0sX4WcgZuz30roP_3lAcyq6JltoWexqHlRJUlmvIChjR5IDa4GMM5Mp1aDoM21JAuZNX7uWVR3kjf3Os3lQd1f_0ny35C8NTbDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3064580470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nociceptors are functionally male or female: from mouse to monkey to man</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Stratton, Harrison ; Lee, Grace ; Dolatyari, Mahdi ; Ghetti, Andre ; Cotta, Tamara ; Mitchell, Stefanie ; Yue, Xu ; Ibrahim, Mohab ; Dumaire, Nicolas ; Salih, Lyuba ; Moutal, Aubin ; François-Moutal, Liberty ; Martin, Laurent ; Navratilova, Edita ; Porreca, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Harrison ; Lee, Grace ; Dolatyari, Mahdi ; Ghetti, Andre ; Cotta, Tamara ; Mitchell, Stefanie ; Yue, Xu ; Ibrahim, Mohab ; Dumaire, Nicolas ; Salih, Lyuba ; Moutal, Aubin ; François-Moutal, Liberty ; Martin, Laurent ; Navratilova, Edita ; Porreca, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>The prevalence of many pain conditions often differs between sexes. In addition to such quantitative distinctions, sexual dimorphism may also be qualitative reflecting differences in mechanisms that promote pain in men and women. A major factor that influences the likelihood of pain perception is the threshold for activation of nociceptors. Peripheral nociceptor sensitization has been demonstrated to be clinically relevant in many pain conditions. Whether peripheral nociceptor sensitization can occur in a sexually dimorphic fashion, however, has not been extensively studied. To address this fundamental knowledge gap, we used patch clamp electrophysiology to evaluate the excitability of dorsal root ganglion neurons from male or female rodents, non-human primates, and humans following exposure to putative sensitizing agents. Previous studies from our laboratory, and others, have shown that prolactin promotes female-selective pain responses in rodents. Consistent with these observations, dorsal root ganglion neurons from female, but not male, mice were selectively sensitized by exposure to prolactin. The sensitizing action of prolactin was also confirmed in dorsal root ganglion neurons from a female macaque monkey. Critically, neurons recovered from female, but not male, human donors were also selectively sensitized by prolactin. In the course of studies of sleep and pain, we unexpectedly observed that an orexin antagonist could normalize pain responses in male animals. We found that orexin B produced sensitization of male, but not female, mouse, macaque, and human dorsal root ganglion neurons. Consistent with functional responses, increased prolactin receptor and orexin receptor 2 expression was observed in female and male mouse dorsal root ganglia, respectively. Immunohistochemical interrogation of cultured human sensory neurons and whole dorsal root ganglia also suggested increased prolactin receptor expression in females and orexin receptor 2 expression in males. These data reveal a functional double dissociation of nociceptor sensitization by sex, which is conserved across species and is likely directly relevant to human pain conditions. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of functional sexual dimorphism in human sensory neurons. Patient sex is currently not a common consideration for the choice of pain therapy. Precision medicine, based on patient sex could improve therapeutic outcomes by selectively targeting mechanisms promoting pain in women or men. Additional implications of these findings are that the design of clinical trials for pain therapies should consider the proportions of male or female patients enrolled. Lastly, re-examination of selected past failed clinical trials with subgroup analysis by sex may be warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8950</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae179</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38829801</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animals ; Female ; Ganglia, Spinal - metabolism ; Humans ; Male ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Nociceptors - metabolism ; Nociceptors - physiology ; Prolactin - metabolism ; Rats ; Sex Characteristics</subject><ispartof>Brain (London, England : 1878), 2024-12, Vol.147 (12), p.4280</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-acbd437adf6d7e83a303138ef8f21933f0b27c8d00996e2a5ad934056687bd473</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7021-853X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38829801$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Harrison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolatyari, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghetti, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotta, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Mohab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumaire, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salih, Lyuba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moutal, Aubin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>François-Moutal, Liberty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navratilova, Edita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porreca, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>Nociceptors are functionally male or female: from mouse to monkey to man</title><title>Brain (London, England : 1878)</title><addtitle>Brain</addtitle><description>The prevalence of many pain conditions often differs between sexes. In addition to such quantitative distinctions, sexual dimorphism may also be qualitative reflecting differences in mechanisms that promote pain in men and women. A major factor that influences the likelihood of pain perception is the threshold for activation of nociceptors. Peripheral nociceptor sensitization has been demonstrated to be clinically relevant in many pain conditions. Whether peripheral nociceptor sensitization can occur in a sexually dimorphic fashion, however, has not been extensively studied. To address this fundamental knowledge gap, we used patch clamp electrophysiology to evaluate the excitability of dorsal root ganglion neurons from male or female rodents, non-human primates, and humans following exposure to putative sensitizing agents. Previous studies from our laboratory, and others, have shown that prolactin promotes female-selective pain responses in rodents. Consistent with these observations, dorsal root ganglion neurons from female, but not male, mice were selectively sensitized by exposure to prolactin. The sensitizing action of prolactin was also confirmed in dorsal root ganglion neurons from a female macaque monkey. Critically, neurons recovered from female, but not male, human donors were also selectively sensitized by prolactin. In the course of studies of sleep and pain, we unexpectedly observed that an orexin antagonist could normalize pain responses in male animals. We found that orexin B produced sensitization of male, but not female, mouse, macaque, and human dorsal root ganglion neurons. Consistent with functional responses, increased prolactin receptor and orexin receptor 2 expression was observed in female and male mouse dorsal root ganglia, respectively. Immunohistochemical interrogation of cultured human sensory neurons and whole dorsal root ganglia also suggested increased prolactin receptor expression in females and orexin receptor 2 expression in males. These data reveal a functional double dissociation of nociceptor sensitization by sex, which is conserved across species and is likely directly relevant to human pain conditions. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of functional sexual dimorphism in human sensory neurons. Patient sex is currently not a common consideration for the choice of pain therapy. Precision medicine, based on patient sex could improve therapeutic outcomes by selectively targeting mechanisms promoting pain in women or men. Additional implications of these findings are that the design of clinical trials for pain therapies should consider the proportions of male or female patients enrolled. Lastly, re-examination of selected past failed clinical trials with subgroup analysis by sex may be warranted.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ganglia, Spinal - metabolism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Nociceptors - metabolism</subject><subject>Nociceptors - physiology</subject><subject>Prolactin - metabolism</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><issn>0006-8950</issn><issn>1460-2156</issn><issn>1460-2156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kL9PwzAQhS0EoqUwsiKPLKHnOHFsNlQBRapggTm6OGcpkMTFToX635P-gOne8N3T08fYtYA7AUbOq4BNP8cfJFGYEzYVmYIkFbk6ZVMAUIk2OUzYRYyfACKTqTpnE6l1ajSIKVu-ettYWg8-RI6BuNv0dmh8j2275R22xH3gjnbpnrvgO975TSQ--DH0X7TdJ-wv2ZnDNtLV8c7Yx9Pj-2KZrN6eXxYPq8SO-4YEbVVnssDaqbogLVGCFFKT0y4VRkoHVVpYXQMYoyjFHGsjM8iV0sX4WcgZuz30roP_3lAcyq6JltoWexqHlRJUlmvIChjR5IDa4GMM5Mp1aDoM21JAuZNX7uWVR3kjf3Os3lQd1f_0ny35C8NTbDg</recordid><startdate>20241203</startdate><enddate>20241203</enddate><creator>Stratton, Harrison</creator><creator>Lee, Grace</creator><creator>Dolatyari, Mahdi</creator><creator>Ghetti, Andre</creator><creator>Cotta, Tamara</creator><creator>Mitchell, Stefanie</creator><creator>Yue, Xu</creator><creator>Ibrahim, Mohab</creator><creator>Dumaire, Nicolas</creator><creator>Salih, Lyuba</creator><creator>Moutal, Aubin</creator><creator>François-Moutal, Liberty</creator><creator>Martin, Laurent</creator><creator>Navratilova, Edita</creator><creator>Porreca, Frank</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7021-853X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241203</creationdate><title>Nociceptors are functionally male or female: from mouse to monkey to man</title><author>Stratton, Harrison ; Lee, Grace ; Dolatyari, Mahdi ; Ghetti, Andre ; Cotta, Tamara ; Mitchell, Stefanie ; Yue, Xu ; Ibrahim, Mohab ; Dumaire, Nicolas ; Salih, Lyuba ; Moutal, Aubin ; François-Moutal, Liberty ; Martin, Laurent ; Navratilova, Edita ; Porreca, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-acbd437adf6d7e83a303138ef8f21933f0b27c8d00996e2a5ad934056687bd473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ganglia, Spinal - metabolism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Nociceptors - metabolism</topic><topic>Nociceptors - physiology</topic><topic>Prolactin - metabolism</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Harrison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolatyari, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghetti, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotta, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Mohab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumaire, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salih, Lyuba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moutal, Aubin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>François-Moutal, Liberty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navratilova, Edita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porreca, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain (London, England : 1878)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stratton, Harrison</au><au>Lee, Grace</au><au>Dolatyari, Mahdi</au><au>Ghetti, Andre</au><au>Cotta, Tamara</au><au>Mitchell, Stefanie</au><au>Yue, Xu</au><au>Ibrahim, Mohab</au><au>Dumaire, Nicolas</au><au>Salih, Lyuba</au><au>Moutal, Aubin</au><au>François-Moutal, Liberty</au><au>Martin, Laurent</au><au>Navratilova, Edita</au><au>Porreca, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nociceptors are functionally male or female: from mouse to monkey to man</atitle><jtitle>Brain (London, England : 1878)</jtitle><addtitle>Brain</addtitle><date>2024-12-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>147</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4280</spage><pages>4280-</pages><issn>0006-8950</issn><issn>1460-2156</issn><eissn>1460-2156</eissn><abstract>The prevalence of many pain conditions often differs between sexes. In addition to such quantitative distinctions, sexual dimorphism may also be qualitative reflecting differences in mechanisms that promote pain in men and women. A major factor that influences the likelihood of pain perception is the threshold for activation of nociceptors. Peripheral nociceptor sensitization has been demonstrated to be clinically relevant in many pain conditions. Whether peripheral nociceptor sensitization can occur in a sexually dimorphic fashion, however, has not been extensively studied. To address this fundamental knowledge gap, we used patch clamp electrophysiology to evaluate the excitability of dorsal root ganglion neurons from male or female rodents, non-human primates, and humans following exposure to putative sensitizing agents. Previous studies from our laboratory, and others, have shown that prolactin promotes female-selective pain responses in rodents. Consistent with these observations, dorsal root ganglion neurons from female, but not male, mice were selectively sensitized by exposure to prolactin. The sensitizing action of prolactin was also confirmed in dorsal root ganglion neurons from a female macaque monkey. Critically, neurons recovered from female, but not male, human donors were also selectively sensitized by prolactin. In the course of studies of sleep and pain, we unexpectedly observed that an orexin antagonist could normalize pain responses in male animals. We found that orexin B produced sensitization of male, but not female, mouse, macaque, and human dorsal root ganglion neurons. Consistent with functional responses, increased prolactin receptor and orexin receptor 2 expression was observed in female and male mouse dorsal root ganglia, respectively. Immunohistochemical interrogation of cultured human sensory neurons and whole dorsal root ganglia also suggested increased prolactin receptor expression in females and orexin receptor 2 expression in males. These data reveal a functional double dissociation of nociceptor sensitization by sex, which is conserved across species and is likely directly relevant to human pain conditions. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of functional sexual dimorphism in human sensory neurons. Patient sex is currently not a common consideration for the choice of pain therapy. Precision medicine, based on patient sex could improve therapeutic outcomes by selectively targeting mechanisms promoting pain in women or men. Additional implications of these findings are that the design of clinical trials for pain therapies should consider the proportions of male or female patients enrolled. Lastly, re-examination of selected past failed clinical trials with subgroup analysis by sex may be warranted.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38829801</pmid><doi>10.1093/brain/awae179</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7021-853X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-8950
ispartof Brain (London, England : 1878), 2024-12, Vol.147 (12), p.4280
issn 0006-8950
1460-2156
1460-2156
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064580470
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adult
Animals
Female
Ganglia, Spinal - metabolism
Humans
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Nociceptors - metabolism
Nociceptors - physiology
Prolactin - metabolism
Rats
Sex Characteristics
title Nociceptors are functionally male or female: from mouse to monkey to man
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A12%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nociceptors%20are%20functionally%20male%20or%20female:%20from%20mouse%20to%20monkey%20to%20man&rft.jtitle=Brain%20(London,%20England%20:%201878)&rft.au=Stratton,%20Harrison&rft.date=2024-12-03&rft.volume=147&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4280&rft.pages=4280-&rft.issn=0006-8950&rft.eissn=1460-2156&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/brain/awae179&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3064580470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-acbd437adf6d7e83a303138ef8f21933f0b27c8d00996e2a5ad934056687bd473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3064580470&rft_id=info:pmid/38829801&rfr_iscdi=true