Loading…

Comparison of two endoscope channel cleaning approaches to remove cyclic build-up biofilm

Biofilm contributes significantly to bacterial persistence in endoscope channels. Enhanced cleaning methods capable of removing biofilm from all endoscope channels are required to decrease infection risk to patients. This head-to-head study compared cyclic build-up biofilm removal of an automated en...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of hospital infection 2024-08, Vol.150, p.91-95
Main Authors: Moshkanbaryans, L., Shah, V., Tan, L.Y., Jones, M.P., Vickery, K., Alfa, M., Burdach, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-db633717b965f85149e0c615431f982f0d0c0c34ac36c84bf4e2a115ed002d2f3
container_end_page 95
container_issue
container_start_page 91
container_title The Journal of hospital infection
container_volume 150
creator Moshkanbaryans, L.
Shah, V.
Tan, L.Y.
Jones, M.P.
Vickery, K.
Alfa, M.
Burdach, J.
description Biofilm contributes significantly to bacterial persistence in endoscope channels. Enhanced cleaning methods capable of removing biofilm from all endoscope channels are required to decrease infection risk to patients. This head-to-head study compared cyclic build-up biofilm removal of an automated endoscope channel cleaner (AECC) with standard manual cleaning according to instructions for use (IFU) in polytetrafluorethylene channels. Cyclic build-up biofilm was grown in 1.4-mm (representing air/water and auxiliary channels) and 3.7-mm (representing suction/ biopsy channels) inner diameter polytetrafluorethylene channels. All channels were tested for residual total organic carbon, protein, and viable bacteria. Internationally recognized ISO 15883-5:2021 alert levels were used as cleaning benchmarks for protein (3 μg/cm2) and total organic carbon (6 μg/cm2). The automated cleaner significantly outperformed manual cleaning for all markers assessed (protein, total organic carbon, viable bacteria) in 1.4-mm and 3.7-mm channels representing air/water/auxiliary and suction/biopsy channels, respectively. Manual cleaning failed to remove biofilm from the air/water and auxiliary channels. According to the IFU, these channels are not brushed, suggesting a potential root cause for a portion of the numerous endoscopy-associated infections reported in the literature. AECC shows potential to deliver enhanced cleaning over current practice to all endoscope channels and may thereby address infection risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.05.014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064581000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670124001993</els_id><sourcerecordid>3064581000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-db633717b965f85149e0c615431f982f0d0c0c34ac36c84bf4e2a115ed002d2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCH-CAfOSSMP7KJhIXtCoUqRIXOHCyHHvMepXYwU6K-u_xagtHTiONnvfVzEPIGwYtA9a9P7WnY4gtBy5bUC0w-YzsmBK84YMYnpMdsEE13R7YFbku5QQAda9ekivR9wKU5Dvy45DmxeRQUqTJ0_V3ohhdKjYtSO3RxIgTtROaGOJPapYlJ2OPWOiaaMY5PVTq0U7B0nELk2u2hY4h-TDNr8gLb6aCr5_mDfn-6fbb4a65__r5y-HjfWN5z9bGjZ0Qe7Yfh075XjE5INiOKSmYH3ruwYEFK6SxorO9HL1EbhhT6AC4417ckHeX3nrarw3LqudQLE6TiZi2ogV0UvWsPl9RfkFtTqVk9HrJYTb5UTPQZ6X6pM9K9VmpBqWr0hp6-9S_jTO6f5G_Divw4QJg_fIhYNbFBowWXchoV-1S-F__H_qih80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3064581000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two endoscope channel cleaning approaches to remove cyclic build-up biofilm</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Moshkanbaryans, L. ; Shah, V. ; Tan, L.Y. ; Jones, M.P. ; Vickery, K. ; Alfa, M. ; Burdach, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moshkanbaryans, L. ; Shah, V. ; Tan, L.Y. ; Jones, M.P. ; Vickery, K. ; Alfa, M. ; Burdach, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Biofilm contributes significantly to bacterial persistence in endoscope channels. Enhanced cleaning methods capable of removing biofilm from all endoscope channels are required to decrease infection risk to patients. This head-to-head study compared cyclic build-up biofilm removal of an automated endoscope channel cleaner (AECC) with standard manual cleaning according to instructions for use (IFU) in polytetrafluorethylene channels. Cyclic build-up biofilm was grown in 1.4-mm (representing air/water and auxiliary channels) and 3.7-mm (representing suction/ biopsy channels) inner diameter polytetrafluorethylene channels. All channels were tested for residual total organic carbon, protein, and viable bacteria. Internationally recognized ISO 15883-5:2021 alert levels were used as cleaning benchmarks for protein (3 μg/cm2) and total organic carbon (6 μg/cm2). The automated cleaner significantly outperformed manual cleaning for all markers assessed (protein, total organic carbon, viable bacteria) in 1.4-mm and 3.7-mm channels representing air/water/auxiliary and suction/biopsy channels, respectively. Manual cleaning failed to remove biofilm from the air/water and auxiliary channels. According to the IFU, these channels are not brushed, suggesting a potential root cause for a portion of the numerous endoscopy-associated infections reported in the literature. AECC shows potential to deliver enhanced cleaning over current practice to all endoscope channels and may thereby address infection risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.05.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38830542</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Biofilm ; Biofilms - growth &amp; development ; Contamination ; Decontamination - methods ; Disinfection - methods ; Endoscope ; Endoscopes - microbiology ; Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control ; Humans ; Infection ; Manual cleaning ; Outbreak</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2024-08, Vol.150, p.91-95</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-db633717b965f85149e0c615431f982f0d0c0c34ac36c84bf4e2a115ed002d2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38830542$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moshkanbaryans, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, L.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vickery, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfa, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdach, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two endoscope channel cleaning approaches to remove cyclic build-up biofilm</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Biofilm contributes significantly to bacterial persistence in endoscope channels. Enhanced cleaning methods capable of removing biofilm from all endoscope channels are required to decrease infection risk to patients. This head-to-head study compared cyclic build-up biofilm removal of an automated endoscope channel cleaner (AECC) with standard manual cleaning according to instructions for use (IFU) in polytetrafluorethylene channels. Cyclic build-up biofilm was grown in 1.4-mm (representing air/water and auxiliary channels) and 3.7-mm (representing suction/ biopsy channels) inner diameter polytetrafluorethylene channels. All channels were tested for residual total organic carbon, protein, and viable bacteria. Internationally recognized ISO 15883-5:2021 alert levels were used as cleaning benchmarks for protein (3 μg/cm2) and total organic carbon (6 μg/cm2). The automated cleaner significantly outperformed manual cleaning for all markers assessed (protein, total organic carbon, viable bacteria) in 1.4-mm and 3.7-mm channels representing air/water/auxiliary and suction/biopsy channels, respectively. Manual cleaning failed to remove biofilm from the air/water and auxiliary channels. According to the IFU, these channels are not brushed, suggesting a potential root cause for a portion of the numerous endoscopy-associated infections reported in the literature. AECC shows potential to deliver enhanced cleaning over current practice to all endoscope channels and may thereby address infection risk.</description><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Biofilm</subject><subject>Biofilms - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Decontamination - methods</subject><subject>Disinfection - methods</subject><subject>Endoscope</subject><subject>Endoscopes - microbiology</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Manual cleaning</subject><subject>Outbreak</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCH-CAfOSSMP7KJhIXtCoUqRIXOHCyHHvMepXYwU6K-u_xagtHTiONnvfVzEPIGwYtA9a9P7WnY4gtBy5bUC0w-YzsmBK84YMYnpMdsEE13R7YFbku5QQAda9ekivR9wKU5Dvy45DmxeRQUqTJ0_V3ohhdKjYtSO3RxIgTtROaGOJPapYlJ2OPWOiaaMY5PVTq0U7B0nELk2u2hY4h-TDNr8gLb6aCr5_mDfn-6fbb4a65__r5y-HjfWN5z9bGjZ0Qe7Yfh075XjE5INiOKSmYH3ruwYEFK6SxorO9HL1EbhhT6AC4417ckHeX3nrarw3LqudQLE6TiZi2ogV0UvWsPl9RfkFtTqVk9HrJYTb5UTPQZ6X6pM9K9VmpBqWr0hp6-9S_jTO6f5G_Divw4QJg_fIhYNbFBowWXchoV-1S-F__H_qih80</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Moshkanbaryans, L.</creator><creator>Shah, V.</creator><creator>Tan, L.Y.</creator><creator>Jones, M.P.</creator><creator>Vickery, K.</creator><creator>Alfa, M.</creator><creator>Burdach, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Comparison of two endoscope channel cleaning approaches to remove cyclic build-up biofilm</title><author>Moshkanbaryans, L. ; Shah, V. ; Tan, L.Y. ; Jones, M.P. ; Vickery, K. ; Alfa, M. ; Burdach, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-db633717b965f85149e0c615431f982f0d0c0c34ac36c84bf4e2a115ed002d2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Biofilm</topic><topic>Biofilms - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Decontamination - methods</topic><topic>Disinfection - methods</topic><topic>Endoscope</topic><topic>Endoscopes - microbiology</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Manual cleaning</topic><topic>Outbreak</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moshkanbaryans, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, L.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vickery, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfa, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdach, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moshkanbaryans, L.</au><au>Shah, V.</au><au>Tan, L.Y.</au><au>Jones, M.P.</au><au>Vickery, K.</au><au>Alfa, M.</au><au>Burdach, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two endoscope channel cleaning approaches to remove cyclic build-up biofilm</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>150</volume><spage>91</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>91-95</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Biofilm contributes significantly to bacterial persistence in endoscope channels. Enhanced cleaning methods capable of removing biofilm from all endoscope channels are required to decrease infection risk to patients. This head-to-head study compared cyclic build-up biofilm removal of an automated endoscope channel cleaner (AECC) with standard manual cleaning according to instructions for use (IFU) in polytetrafluorethylene channels. Cyclic build-up biofilm was grown in 1.4-mm (representing air/water and auxiliary channels) and 3.7-mm (representing suction/ biopsy channels) inner diameter polytetrafluorethylene channels. All channels were tested for residual total organic carbon, protein, and viable bacteria. Internationally recognized ISO 15883-5:2021 alert levels were used as cleaning benchmarks for protein (3 μg/cm2) and total organic carbon (6 μg/cm2). The automated cleaner significantly outperformed manual cleaning for all markers assessed (protein, total organic carbon, viable bacteria) in 1.4-mm and 3.7-mm channels representing air/water/auxiliary and suction/biopsy channels, respectively. Manual cleaning failed to remove biofilm from the air/water and auxiliary channels. According to the IFU, these channels are not brushed, suggesting a potential root cause for a portion of the numerous endoscopy-associated infections reported in the literature. AECC shows potential to deliver enhanced cleaning over current practice to all endoscope channels and may thereby address infection risk.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38830542</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2024.05.014</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6701
ispartof The Journal of hospital infection, 2024-08, Vol.150, p.91-95
issn 0195-6701
1532-2939
1532-2939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064581000
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Bacteria - isolation & purification
Biofilm
Biofilms - growth & development
Contamination
Decontamination - methods
Disinfection - methods
Endoscope
Endoscopes - microbiology
Equipment Contamination - prevention & control
Humans
Infection
Manual cleaning
Outbreak
title Comparison of two endoscope channel cleaning approaches to remove cyclic build-up biofilm
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T18%3A35%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20endoscope%20channel%20cleaning%20approaches%20to%20remove%20cyclic%20build-up%20biofilm&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Moshkanbaryans,%20L.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=150&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=91-95&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.05.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3064581000%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-db633717b965f85149e0c615431f982f0d0c0c34ac36c84bf4e2a115ed002d2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3064581000&rft_id=info:pmid/38830542&rfr_iscdi=true