Loading…
Comparison of two endoscope channel cleaning approaches to remove cyclic build-up biofilm
Biofilm contributes significantly to bacterial persistence in endoscope channels. Enhanced cleaning methods capable of removing biofilm from all endoscope channels are required to decrease infection risk to patients. This head-to-head study compared cyclic build-up biofilm removal of an automated en...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of hospital infection 2024-08, Vol.150, p.91-95 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-db633717b965f85149e0c615431f982f0d0c0c34ac36c84bf4e2a115ed002d2f3 |
container_end_page | 95 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 91 |
container_title | The Journal of hospital infection |
container_volume | 150 |
creator | Moshkanbaryans, L. Shah, V. Tan, L.Y. Jones, M.P. Vickery, K. Alfa, M. Burdach, J. |
description | Biofilm contributes significantly to bacterial persistence in endoscope channels. Enhanced cleaning methods capable of removing biofilm from all endoscope channels are required to decrease infection risk to patients. This head-to-head study compared cyclic build-up biofilm removal of an automated endoscope channel cleaner (AECC) with standard manual cleaning according to instructions for use (IFU) in polytetrafluorethylene channels.
Cyclic build-up biofilm was grown in 1.4-mm (representing air/water and auxiliary channels) and 3.7-mm (representing suction/ biopsy channels) inner diameter polytetrafluorethylene channels. All channels were tested for residual total organic carbon, protein, and viable bacteria. Internationally recognized ISO 15883-5:2021 alert levels were used as cleaning benchmarks for protein (3 μg/cm2) and total organic carbon (6 μg/cm2).
The automated cleaner significantly outperformed manual cleaning for all markers assessed (protein, total organic carbon, viable bacteria) in 1.4-mm and 3.7-mm channels representing air/water/auxiliary and suction/biopsy channels, respectively. Manual cleaning failed to remove biofilm from the air/water and auxiliary channels. According to the IFU, these channels are not brushed, suggesting a potential root cause for a portion of the numerous endoscopy-associated infections reported in the literature.
AECC shows potential to deliver enhanced cleaning over current practice to all endoscope channels and may thereby address infection risk. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.05.014 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064581000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670124001993</els_id><sourcerecordid>3064581000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-db633717b965f85149e0c615431f982f0d0c0c34ac36c84bf4e2a115ed002d2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCH-CAfOSSMP7KJhIXtCoUqRIXOHCyHHvMepXYwU6K-u_xagtHTiONnvfVzEPIGwYtA9a9P7WnY4gtBy5bUC0w-YzsmBK84YMYnpMdsEE13R7YFbku5QQAda9ekivR9wKU5Dvy45DmxeRQUqTJ0_V3ohhdKjYtSO3RxIgTtROaGOJPapYlJ2OPWOiaaMY5PVTq0U7B0nELk2u2hY4h-TDNr8gLb6aCr5_mDfn-6fbb4a65__r5y-HjfWN5z9bGjZ0Qe7Yfh075XjE5INiOKSmYH3ruwYEFK6SxorO9HL1EbhhT6AC4417ckHeX3nrarw3LqudQLE6TiZi2ogV0UvWsPl9RfkFtTqVk9HrJYTb5UTPQZ6X6pM9K9VmpBqWr0hp6-9S_jTO6f5G_Divw4QJg_fIhYNbFBowWXchoV-1S-F__H_qih80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3064581000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two endoscope channel cleaning approaches to remove cyclic build-up biofilm</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Moshkanbaryans, L. ; Shah, V. ; Tan, L.Y. ; Jones, M.P. ; Vickery, K. ; Alfa, M. ; Burdach, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moshkanbaryans, L. ; Shah, V. ; Tan, L.Y. ; Jones, M.P. ; Vickery, K. ; Alfa, M. ; Burdach, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Biofilm contributes significantly to bacterial persistence in endoscope channels. Enhanced cleaning methods capable of removing biofilm from all endoscope channels are required to decrease infection risk to patients. This head-to-head study compared cyclic build-up biofilm removal of an automated endoscope channel cleaner (AECC) with standard manual cleaning according to instructions for use (IFU) in polytetrafluorethylene channels.
Cyclic build-up biofilm was grown in 1.4-mm (representing air/water and auxiliary channels) and 3.7-mm (representing suction/ biopsy channels) inner diameter polytetrafluorethylene channels. All channels were tested for residual total organic carbon, protein, and viable bacteria. Internationally recognized ISO 15883-5:2021 alert levels were used as cleaning benchmarks for protein (3 μg/cm2) and total organic carbon (6 μg/cm2).
The automated cleaner significantly outperformed manual cleaning for all markers assessed (protein, total organic carbon, viable bacteria) in 1.4-mm and 3.7-mm channels representing air/water/auxiliary and suction/biopsy channels, respectively. Manual cleaning failed to remove biofilm from the air/water and auxiliary channels. According to the IFU, these channels are not brushed, suggesting a potential root cause for a portion of the numerous endoscopy-associated infections reported in the literature.
AECC shows potential to deliver enhanced cleaning over current practice to all endoscope channels and may thereby address infection risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.05.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38830542</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Biofilm ; Biofilms - growth & development ; Contamination ; Decontamination - methods ; Disinfection - methods ; Endoscope ; Endoscopes - microbiology ; Equipment Contamination - prevention & control ; Humans ; Infection ; Manual cleaning ; Outbreak</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2024-08, Vol.150, p.91-95</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-db633717b965f85149e0c615431f982f0d0c0c34ac36c84bf4e2a115ed002d2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38830542$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moshkanbaryans, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, L.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vickery, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfa, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdach, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two endoscope channel cleaning approaches to remove cyclic build-up biofilm</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Biofilm contributes significantly to bacterial persistence in endoscope channels. Enhanced cleaning methods capable of removing biofilm from all endoscope channels are required to decrease infection risk to patients. This head-to-head study compared cyclic build-up biofilm removal of an automated endoscope channel cleaner (AECC) with standard manual cleaning according to instructions for use (IFU) in polytetrafluorethylene channels.
Cyclic build-up biofilm was grown in 1.4-mm (representing air/water and auxiliary channels) and 3.7-mm (representing suction/ biopsy channels) inner diameter polytetrafluorethylene channels. All channels were tested for residual total organic carbon, protein, and viable bacteria. Internationally recognized ISO 15883-5:2021 alert levels were used as cleaning benchmarks for protein (3 μg/cm2) and total organic carbon (6 μg/cm2).
The automated cleaner significantly outperformed manual cleaning for all markers assessed (protein, total organic carbon, viable bacteria) in 1.4-mm and 3.7-mm channels representing air/water/auxiliary and suction/biopsy channels, respectively. Manual cleaning failed to remove biofilm from the air/water and auxiliary channels. According to the IFU, these channels are not brushed, suggesting a potential root cause for a portion of the numerous endoscopy-associated infections reported in the literature.
AECC shows potential to deliver enhanced cleaning over current practice to all endoscope channels and may thereby address infection risk.</description><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Biofilm</subject><subject>Biofilms - growth & development</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Decontamination - methods</subject><subject>Disinfection - methods</subject><subject>Endoscope</subject><subject>Endoscopes - microbiology</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Manual cleaning</subject><subject>Outbreak</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCH-CAfOSSMP7KJhIXtCoUqRIXOHCyHHvMepXYwU6K-u_xagtHTiONnvfVzEPIGwYtA9a9P7WnY4gtBy5bUC0w-YzsmBK84YMYnpMdsEE13R7YFbku5QQAda9ekivR9wKU5Dvy45DmxeRQUqTJ0_V3ohhdKjYtSO3RxIgTtROaGOJPapYlJ2OPWOiaaMY5PVTq0U7B0nELk2u2hY4h-TDNr8gLb6aCr5_mDfn-6fbb4a65__r5y-HjfWN5z9bGjZ0Qe7Yfh075XjE5INiOKSmYH3ruwYEFK6SxorO9HL1EbhhT6AC4417ckHeX3nrarw3LqudQLE6TiZi2ogV0UvWsPl9RfkFtTqVk9HrJYTb5UTPQZ6X6pM9K9VmpBqWr0hp6-9S_jTO6f5G_Divw4QJg_fIhYNbFBowWXchoV-1S-F__H_qih80</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Moshkanbaryans, L.</creator><creator>Shah, V.</creator><creator>Tan, L.Y.</creator><creator>Jones, M.P.</creator><creator>Vickery, K.</creator><creator>Alfa, M.</creator><creator>Burdach, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Comparison of two endoscope channel cleaning approaches to remove cyclic build-up biofilm</title><author>Moshkanbaryans, L. ; Shah, V. ; Tan, L.Y. ; Jones, M.P. ; Vickery, K. ; Alfa, M. ; Burdach, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-db633717b965f85149e0c615431f982f0d0c0c34ac36c84bf4e2a115ed002d2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Biofilm</topic><topic>Biofilms - growth & development</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Decontamination - methods</topic><topic>Disinfection - methods</topic><topic>Endoscope</topic><topic>Endoscopes - microbiology</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Manual cleaning</topic><topic>Outbreak</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moshkanbaryans, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, L.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vickery, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfa, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burdach, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moshkanbaryans, L.</au><au>Shah, V.</au><au>Tan, L.Y.</au><au>Jones, M.P.</au><au>Vickery, K.</au><au>Alfa, M.</au><au>Burdach, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two endoscope channel cleaning approaches to remove cyclic build-up biofilm</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>150</volume><spage>91</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>91-95</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Biofilm contributes significantly to bacterial persistence in endoscope channels. Enhanced cleaning methods capable of removing biofilm from all endoscope channels are required to decrease infection risk to patients. This head-to-head study compared cyclic build-up biofilm removal of an automated endoscope channel cleaner (AECC) with standard manual cleaning according to instructions for use (IFU) in polytetrafluorethylene channels.
Cyclic build-up biofilm was grown in 1.4-mm (representing air/water and auxiliary channels) and 3.7-mm (representing suction/ biopsy channels) inner diameter polytetrafluorethylene channels. All channels were tested for residual total organic carbon, protein, and viable bacteria. Internationally recognized ISO 15883-5:2021 alert levels were used as cleaning benchmarks for protein (3 μg/cm2) and total organic carbon (6 μg/cm2).
The automated cleaner significantly outperformed manual cleaning for all markers assessed (protein, total organic carbon, viable bacteria) in 1.4-mm and 3.7-mm channels representing air/water/auxiliary and suction/biopsy channels, respectively. Manual cleaning failed to remove biofilm from the air/water and auxiliary channels. According to the IFU, these channels are not brushed, suggesting a potential root cause for a portion of the numerous endoscopy-associated infections reported in the literature.
AECC shows potential to deliver enhanced cleaning over current practice to all endoscope channels and may thereby address infection risk.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38830542</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2024.05.014</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6701 |
ispartof | The Journal of hospital infection, 2024-08, Vol.150, p.91-95 |
issn | 0195-6701 1532-2939 1532-2939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064581000 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Bacteria - isolation & purification Biofilm Biofilms - growth & development Contamination Decontamination - methods Disinfection - methods Endoscope Endoscopes - microbiology Equipment Contamination - prevention & control Humans Infection Manual cleaning Outbreak |
title | Comparison of two endoscope channel cleaning approaches to remove cyclic build-up biofilm |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T18%3A35%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20endoscope%20channel%20cleaning%20approaches%20to%20remove%20cyclic%20build-up%20biofilm&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Moshkanbaryans,%20L.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=150&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=91-95&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.05.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3064581000%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-db633717b965f85149e0c615431f982f0d0c0c34ac36c84bf4e2a115ed002d2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3064581000&rft_id=info:pmid/38830542&rfr_iscdi=true |