Sensitivity of knee cartilage biomechanics in finite element analysis to selected Musculoskeletal models

Knee joint kinematics and kinetics analyzed by musculoskeletal (MS) modeling are often utilized in finite element (FE) models, estimating tissue-level mechanical responses. We compared knee cartilage stresses, strains, and centers of pressure of FE models driven by two widely used MS models, impleme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering 2024-06, p.1-12
Main Authors: Peitola, Joose P J, Esrafilian, Amir, Eskelinen, Atte S A, Andersen, Michael S, Korhonen, Rami K
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 12
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering
container_volume
creator Peitola, Joose P J
Esrafilian, Amir
Eskelinen, Atte S A
Andersen, Michael S
Korhonen, Rami K
description Knee joint kinematics and kinetics analyzed by musculoskeletal (MS) modeling are often utilized in finite element (FE) models, estimating tissue-level mechanical responses. We compared knee cartilage stresses, strains, and centers of pressure of FE models driven by two widely used MS models, implemented in AnyBody and OpenSim. Minor discrepancies in the results were observed between the models. AnyBody-driven FE models showed slightly higher stresses in the medial tibial cartilage, while OpenSim-driven FE models estimated more anterior and lateral center of pressure. Recognizing these differences in the MS-FE models is important to ensure reliable analysis of cartilage mechanics and failure and simulation of rehabilitation.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10255842.2024.2360594
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064582610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3064582610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-32ef76111c24d38f2b1a431f2d03496ae74fb0adc377e57ccf8352d5e7a95073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1KAzEYRYMgtlYfQcnSzdQvfzOZpRT_oOLC7odM5ouNzWTqJCP07S1YVxcOh7O4hNwwWDLQcM-AK6UlX3LgcslFCaqWZ2TOZFUWmqt6Ri5T-gIAzbS8IDOhtRAAak62HxiTz_7H5wMdHN1FRGrNmH0wn0hbP_RotyZ6m6iP1PnoM1IM2GPM1EQTDsknmgeajtBm7OjblOwUhrQ7gmwC7YcOQ7oi586EhNenXZDN0-Nm9VKs359fVw_rYs8ky4Xg6KqSMWa57IR2vGVGCuZ4B0LWpcFKuhZMZ0VVoaqsdVoo3imsTK2gEgty95fdj8P3hCk3vU8WQzARhyk1AkqpNC8ZHNXbkzq1PXbNfvS9GQ_N_zniF7ydZy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3064582610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitivity of knee cartilage biomechanics in finite element analysis to selected Musculoskeletal models</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Peitola, Joose P J ; Esrafilian, Amir ; Eskelinen, Atte S A ; Andersen, Michael S ; Korhonen, Rami K</creator><creatorcontrib>Peitola, Joose P J ; Esrafilian, Amir ; Eskelinen, Atte S A ; Andersen, Michael S ; Korhonen, Rami K</creatorcontrib><description>Knee joint kinematics and kinetics analyzed by musculoskeletal (MS) modeling are often utilized in finite element (FE) models, estimating tissue-level mechanical responses. We compared knee cartilage stresses, strains, and centers of pressure of FE models driven by two widely used MS models, implemented in AnyBody and OpenSim. Minor discrepancies in the results were observed between the models. AnyBody-driven FE models showed slightly higher stresses in the medial tibial cartilage, while OpenSim-driven FE models estimated more anterior and lateral center of pressure. Recognizing these differences in the MS-FE models is important to ensure reliable analysis of cartilage mechanics and failure and simulation of rehabilitation.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1476-8259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2024.2360594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38833005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering, 2024-06, p.1-12</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38833005$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peitola, Joose P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esrafilian, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskelinen, Atte S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korhonen, Rami K</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitivity of knee cartilage biomechanics in finite element analysis to selected Musculoskeletal models</title><title>Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering</title><addtitle>Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin</addtitle><description>Knee joint kinematics and kinetics analyzed by musculoskeletal (MS) modeling are often utilized in finite element (FE) models, estimating tissue-level mechanical responses. We compared knee cartilage stresses, strains, and centers of pressure of FE models driven by two widely used MS models, implemented in AnyBody and OpenSim. Minor discrepancies in the results were observed between the models. AnyBody-driven FE models showed slightly higher stresses in the medial tibial cartilage, while OpenSim-driven FE models estimated more anterior and lateral center of pressure. Recognizing these differences in the MS-FE models is important to ensure reliable analysis of cartilage mechanics and failure and simulation of rehabilitation.</description><issn>1476-8259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kM1KAzEYRYMgtlYfQcnSzdQvfzOZpRT_oOLC7odM5ouNzWTqJCP07S1YVxcOh7O4hNwwWDLQcM-AK6UlX3LgcslFCaqWZ2TOZFUWmqt6Ri5T-gIAzbS8IDOhtRAAak62HxiTz_7H5wMdHN1FRGrNmH0wn0hbP_RotyZ6m6iP1PnoM1IM2GPM1EQTDsknmgeajtBm7OjblOwUhrQ7gmwC7YcOQ7oi586EhNenXZDN0-Nm9VKs359fVw_rYs8ky4Xg6KqSMWa57IR2vGVGCuZ4B0LWpcFKuhZMZ0VVoaqsdVoo3imsTK2gEgty95fdj8P3hCk3vU8WQzARhyk1AkqpNC8ZHNXbkzq1PXbNfvS9GQ_N_zniF7ydZy0</recordid><startdate>20240604</startdate><enddate>20240604</enddate><creator>Peitola, Joose P J</creator><creator>Esrafilian, Amir</creator><creator>Eskelinen, Atte S A</creator><creator>Andersen, Michael S</creator><creator>Korhonen, Rami K</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240604</creationdate><title>Sensitivity of knee cartilage biomechanics in finite element analysis to selected Musculoskeletal models</title><author>Peitola, Joose P J ; Esrafilian, Amir ; Eskelinen, Atte S A ; Andersen, Michael S ; Korhonen, Rami K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-32ef76111c24d38f2b1a431f2d03496ae74fb0adc377e57ccf8352d5e7a95073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peitola, Joose P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esrafilian, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskelinen, Atte S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korhonen, Rami K</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peitola, Joose P J</au><au>Esrafilian, Amir</au><au>Eskelinen, Atte S A</au><au>Andersen, Michael S</au><au>Korhonen, Rami K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitivity of knee cartilage biomechanics in finite element analysis to selected Musculoskeletal models</atitle><jtitle>Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin</addtitle><date>2024-06-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><eissn>1476-8259</eissn><abstract>Knee joint kinematics and kinetics analyzed by musculoskeletal (MS) modeling are often utilized in finite element (FE) models, estimating tissue-level mechanical responses. We compared knee cartilage stresses, strains, and centers of pressure of FE models driven by two widely used MS models, implemented in AnyBody and OpenSim. Minor discrepancies in the results were observed between the models. AnyBody-driven FE models showed slightly higher stresses in the medial tibial cartilage, while OpenSim-driven FE models estimated more anterior and lateral center of pressure. Recognizing these differences in the MS-FE models is important to ensure reliable analysis of cartilage mechanics and failure and simulation of rehabilitation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38833005</pmid><doi>10.1080/10255842.2024.2360594</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1476-8259
ispartof Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering, 2024-06, p.1-12
issn 1476-8259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064582610
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
title Sensitivity of knee cartilage biomechanics in finite element analysis to selected Musculoskeletal models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A07%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitivity%20of%20knee%20cartilage%20biomechanics%20in%20finite%20element%20analysis%20to%20selected%20Musculoskeletal%20models&rft.jtitle=Computer%20methods%20in%20biomechanics%20and%20biomedical%20engineering&rft.au=Peitola,%20Joose%20P%20J&rft.date=2024-06-04&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.eissn=1476-8259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10255842.2024.2360594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3064582610%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-32ef76111c24d38f2b1a431f2d03496ae74fb0adc377e57ccf8352d5e7a95073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3064582610&rft_id=info:pmid/38833005&rfr_iscdi=true