Analysis of Public Comments on Experimental Regulations for Protecting Black Bass during The Spawning Period in Eastern Ontario Reveals Both Stakeholder Acceptance and Skepticism

• Published in: Environmental management (New York) 2024-09, Vol.74 (3), p.532-546
• Main Authors: Zhang, J., Philipp, D. P., Claussen, J. E., Suski, C. D., Nguyen, V. M., Young, N., Lombardo, J., Cooke, S. J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Aquatic Pollution; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution; Bass; Clines; Compliance; Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods; Earth and Environmental Science; Ecology; Environment; Environmental Management; Fisheries - legislation & jurisprudence; Fishing; Forestry Management; Lakes; Micropterus; Micropterus dolomieu; Nature Conservation; Nesting; Ontario; Public Opinion; Regulations; Reproduction; Sanctuaries; Spawning; Sport fishing; Stakeholders; Waste Water Technology; Water Management; Water Pollution Control
• ISSN: 0364-152X; 1432-1009; 1432-1009
• DOI: 10.1007/s00267-024-01996-0

Recreational angling of nesting largemouth bass ( Micropterus nigricans ) and smallmouth bass ( M. dolomieu ) can greatly increase nest abandonment, and in the northern clines of their range, decrease recruitment. This is the case in eastern Ontario, where high levels of non-compliance and difficult to enforce regulations have impacted black bass ( Micropterus spp.) conservation and management. Effective January 1, 2024 until December 31 st , 2025, novel and experimental fishing sanctuaries were imposed on portions of Charleston Lake and Opinicon Lake that prohibit recreational fishing of all types from April 15 th to the Friday before the first Saturday in July (encompassing the full bass reproductive season). As part of the formal process to institute these experimental regulations, public comments were collected on the Environmental Registry of Ontario. We examined those comments and identified supportive and non-supportive themes related to these experimental regulations. While a majority of stakeholders were in support of the new regulations, we also noted sub-themes that may hinder regulation acceptance. Those sub-themes include: a perceived lack of enforcement negating the potential benefits of the sanctuaries, under-estimation of the extent of non-compliance with existing regulations such that new regulations are unnecessary, misunderstanding and misinformation, as well as distrust of government and the academic research community. Understanding and addressing these stakeholder perspectives will help researchers studying the new sanctuary areas and managers understand any lack of compliance while informing future decisions about bass management in eastern Ontario and beyond.