Loading…

Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of invasive melanoma: A systematic review with meta-analyses

The use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in melanoma treatment has divided opinion and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. This systematic review aimed to analyse clinical outcomes for patients with invasive melanomas treated with Mohs rather than wide local excision (WLE). Embase, MEDLINE and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2024-06
Main Authors: Williams, G J, Quinn, T, Lo, S, Guitera, P, Scolyer, R A, Thompson, J F, Ch'ng, S
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-1ef5beb351b3498f7e1b97d0780c7ce78251b87e004fd2910419ad94c972af463
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
container_volume
creator Williams, G J
Quinn, T
Lo, S
Guitera, P
Scolyer, R A
Thompson, J F
Ch'ng, S
description The use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in melanoma treatment has divided opinion and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. This systematic review aimed to analyse clinical outcomes for patients with invasive melanomas treated with Mohs rather than wide local excision (WLE). Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases (to 30 August 2023) were searched for studies using Mohs to treat invasive melanoma. Outcomes of interest were local recurrence and death from melanoma. Thirty-five articles involving 41,499 patients with invasive melanoma treated with Mohs were identified. Sixteen studies compared Mohs with WLE and 19 were Mohs-only, non-comparative studies. Patients treated with Mohs differed significantly from those undergoing WLE, in particular Mohs patients were older and had thinner melanomas. Two comparative studies using the same data source reported adjusted hazard ratios for melanoma-specific death and both showed no significant difference between Mohs and WLE-treated patients; 0.87 (95% CI 0.55-1.35) and 1.20 (95% CI 0.71-20.36). There was also no statistically significant difference in local recurrence risk; the unadjusted risk ratio for patients treated with Mohs was 0.46 (95% CI 0.14-1.51 p = 0.20) with moderate heterogeneity (I  = 62%). No studies reported multivariable analyses for risk of local recurrence. Many studies generated from relatively few and often overlapping data sets have reported the use of Mohs to treat patients with invasive melanoma. Fewer studies were comparative between Mohs and WLE and these reported substantially different baseline risks of recurrence and death from melanoma between the groups. Mohs has generally been used for thinner melanomas in older patients; therefore, comparisons based on univariable analyses are likely to have been misleading. On the basis of currently available data, it is not possible to reliably assess whether outcomes differ if invasive melanomas with comparable features are treated with Mohs or WLE, and randomized trial evidence will be required for reliable conclusions to be reached.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jdv.20138
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3065273247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3065273247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-1ef5beb351b3498f7e1b97d0780c7ce78251b87e004fd2910419ad94c972af463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQl7BI8SOJbXZVxUsqYgPryEnGTao8iu2myt9jaGE2s5gzVzMHoWtK5jTU_aYc5oxQLk_QlMapjDiR_BRNiWJppFSiJujCuQ0hhNJEnqMJlzJmVJApqt76yuG2Lmy_tnpb1QV2O7sGO2LTW-wrwN6C9i10HvcG192gXT0AbqHRXd_qB7zAbnQeWu3DsoWhhj3e174KiNeR7nQzOnCX6MzoxsHVsc_Q59Pjx_IlWr0_vy4Xq6hglPiIgklyyHlCcx4raQTQXImSCEkKUYCQLEykAEJiUzJFSUyVLlVcKMG0iVM-Q7eH3K3tv3bgfNbWroAmXAv9zmWcpAkTnMUioHcHNDzvnAWTbW3dajtmlGQ_YrMgNvsVG9ibY-wub6H8J_9M8m_fVXSa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3065273247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of invasive melanoma: A systematic review with meta-analyses</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Williams, G J ; Quinn, T ; Lo, S ; Guitera, P ; Scolyer, R A ; Thompson, J F ; Ch'ng, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Williams, G J ; Quinn, T ; Lo, S ; Guitera, P ; Scolyer, R A ; Thompson, J F ; Ch'ng, S</creatorcontrib><description>The use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in melanoma treatment has divided opinion and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. This systematic review aimed to analyse clinical outcomes for patients with invasive melanomas treated with Mohs rather than wide local excision (WLE). Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases (to 30 August 2023) were searched for studies using Mohs to treat invasive melanoma. Outcomes of interest were local recurrence and death from melanoma. Thirty-five articles involving 41,499 patients with invasive melanoma treated with Mohs were identified. Sixteen studies compared Mohs with WLE and 19 were Mohs-only, non-comparative studies. Patients treated with Mohs differed significantly from those undergoing WLE, in particular Mohs patients were older and had thinner melanomas. Two comparative studies using the same data source reported adjusted hazard ratios for melanoma-specific death and both showed no significant difference between Mohs and WLE-treated patients; 0.87 (95% CI 0.55-1.35) and 1.20 (95% CI 0.71-20.36). There was also no statistically significant difference in local recurrence risk; the unadjusted risk ratio for patients treated with Mohs was 0.46 (95% CI 0.14-1.51 p = 0.20) with moderate heterogeneity (I  = 62%). No studies reported multivariable analyses for risk of local recurrence. Many studies generated from relatively few and often overlapping data sets have reported the use of Mohs to treat patients with invasive melanoma. Fewer studies were comparative between Mohs and WLE and these reported substantially different baseline risks of recurrence and death from melanoma between the groups. Mohs has generally been used for thinner melanomas in older patients; therefore, comparisons based on univariable analyses are likely to have been misleading. On the basis of currently available data, it is not possible to reliably assess whether outcomes differ if invasive melanomas with comparable features are treated with Mohs or WLE, and randomized trial evidence will be required for reliable conclusions to be reached.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-9959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jdv.20138</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38842170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2024-06</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-1ef5beb351b3498f7e1b97d0780c7ce78251b87e004fd2910419ad94c972af463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2816-2496 ; 0000-0002-4011-1253 ; 0000-0001-5092-5544</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38842170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williams, G J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guitera, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scolyer, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ch'ng, S</creatorcontrib><title>Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of invasive melanoma: A systematic review with meta-analyses</title><title>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</title><addtitle>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><description>The use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in melanoma treatment has divided opinion and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. This systematic review aimed to analyse clinical outcomes for patients with invasive melanomas treated with Mohs rather than wide local excision (WLE). Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases (to 30 August 2023) were searched for studies using Mohs to treat invasive melanoma. Outcomes of interest were local recurrence and death from melanoma. Thirty-five articles involving 41,499 patients with invasive melanoma treated with Mohs were identified. Sixteen studies compared Mohs with WLE and 19 were Mohs-only, non-comparative studies. Patients treated with Mohs differed significantly from those undergoing WLE, in particular Mohs patients were older and had thinner melanomas. Two comparative studies using the same data source reported adjusted hazard ratios for melanoma-specific death and both showed no significant difference between Mohs and WLE-treated patients; 0.87 (95% CI 0.55-1.35) and 1.20 (95% CI 0.71-20.36). There was also no statistically significant difference in local recurrence risk; the unadjusted risk ratio for patients treated with Mohs was 0.46 (95% CI 0.14-1.51 p = 0.20) with moderate heterogeneity (I  = 62%). No studies reported multivariable analyses for risk of local recurrence. Many studies generated from relatively few and often overlapping data sets have reported the use of Mohs to treat patients with invasive melanoma. Fewer studies were comparative between Mohs and WLE and these reported substantially different baseline risks of recurrence and death from melanoma between the groups. Mohs has generally been used for thinner melanomas in older patients; therefore, comparisons based on univariable analyses are likely to have been misleading. On the basis of currently available data, it is not possible to reliably assess whether outcomes differ if invasive melanomas with comparable features are treated with Mohs or WLE, and randomized trial evidence will be required for reliable conclusions to be reached.</description><issn>0926-9959</issn><issn>1468-3083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQl7BI8SOJbXZVxUsqYgPryEnGTao8iu2myt9jaGE2s5gzVzMHoWtK5jTU_aYc5oxQLk_QlMapjDiR_BRNiWJppFSiJujCuQ0hhNJEnqMJlzJmVJApqt76yuG2Lmy_tnpb1QV2O7sGO2LTW-wrwN6C9i10HvcG192gXT0AbqHRXd_qB7zAbnQeWu3DsoWhhj3e174KiNeR7nQzOnCX6MzoxsHVsc_Q59Pjx_IlWr0_vy4Xq6hglPiIgklyyHlCcx4raQTQXImSCEkKUYCQLEykAEJiUzJFSUyVLlVcKMG0iVM-Q7eH3K3tv3bgfNbWroAmXAv9zmWcpAkTnMUioHcHNDzvnAWTbW3dajtmlGQ_YrMgNvsVG9ibY-wub6H8J_9M8m_fVXSa</recordid><startdate>20240606</startdate><enddate>20240606</enddate><creator>Williams, G J</creator><creator>Quinn, T</creator><creator>Lo, S</creator><creator>Guitera, P</creator><creator>Scolyer, R A</creator><creator>Thompson, J F</creator><creator>Ch'ng, S</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2816-2496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4011-1253</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-5544</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240606</creationdate><title>Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of invasive melanoma: A systematic review with meta-analyses</title><author>Williams, G J ; Quinn, T ; Lo, S ; Guitera, P ; Scolyer, R A ; Thompson, J F ; Ch'ng, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-1ef5beb351b3498f7e1b97d0780c7ce78251b87e004fd2910419ad94c972af463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williams, G J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guitera, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scolyer, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ch'ng, S</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williams, G J</au><au>Quinn, T</au><au>Lo, S</au><au>Guitera, P</au><au>Scolyer, R A</au><au>Thompson, J F</au><au>Ch'ng, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of invasive melanoma: A systematic review with meta-analyses</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</jtitle><addtitle>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><date>2024-06-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0926-9959</issn><eissn>1468-3083</eissn><abstract>The use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in melanoma treatment has divided opinion and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. This systematic review aimed to analyse clinical outcomes for patients with invasive melanomas treated with Mohs rather than wide local excision (WLE). Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases (to 30 August 2023) were searched for studies using Mohs to treat invasive melanoma. Outcomes of interest were local recurrence and death from melanoma. Thirty-five articles involving 41,499 patients with invasive melanoma treated with Mohs were identified. Sixteen studies compared Mohs with WLE and 19 were Mohs-only, non-comparative studies. Patients treated with Mohs differed significantly from those undergoing WLE, in particular Mohs patients were older and had thinner melanomas. Two comparative studies using the same data source reported adjusted hazard ratios for melanoma-specific death and both showed no significant difference between Mohs and WLE-treated patients; 0.87 (95% CI 0.55-1.35) and 1.20 (95% CI 0.71-20.36). There was also no statistically significant difference in local recurrence risk; the unadjusted risk ratio for patients treated with Mohs was 0.46 (95% CI 0.14-1.51 p = 0.20) with moderate heterogeneity (I  = 62%). No studies reported multivariable analyses for risk of local recurrence. Many studies generated from relatively few and often overlapping data sets have reported the use of Mohs to treat patients with invasive melanoma. Fewer studies were comparative between Mohs and WLE and these reported substantially different baseline risks of recurrence and death from melanoma between the groups. Mohs has generally been used for thinner melanomas in older patients; therefore, comparisons based on univariable analyses are likely to have been misleading. On the basis of currently available data, it is not possible to reliably assess whether outcomes differ if invasive melanomas with comparable features are treated with Mohs or WLE, and randomized trial evidence will be required for reliable conclusions to be reached.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38842170</pmid><doi>10.1111/jdv.20138</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2816-2496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4011-1253</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-5544</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0926-9959
ispartof Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2024-06
issn 0926-9959
1468-3083
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3065273247
source Wiley
title Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of invasive melanoma: A systematic review with meta-analyses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A16%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mohs%20micrographic%20surgery%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20invasive%20melanoma:%20A%20systematic%20review%20with%20meta-analyses&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20European%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology%20and%20Venereology&rft.au=Williams,%20G%20J&rft.date=2024-06-06&rft.issn=0926-9959&rft.eissn=1468-3083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jdv.20138&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3065273247%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-1ef5beb351b3498f7e1b97d0780c7ce78251b87e004fd2910419ad94c972af463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3065273247&rft_id=info:pmid/38842170&rfr_iscdi=true