Loading…
Assessing stimulus preference using response force in a conjugate preparation: A replication and extension
The current study examined 98 participants' preferences for five pictorial stimuli. The researchers used a verbal multiple‐stimulus‐without‐replacement (VMSWO) preference assessment with each participant to identify high‐preference and low‐preference pictorial stimuli. Next, participants viewed...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2024-07, Vol.122 (1), p.25-41 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2406-c38ac33b39c7ad728901aa3cd55729ba1dac4318b5a83c64fa50ce42f42546d93 |
container_end_page | 41 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 25 |
container_title | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior |
container_volume | 122 |
creator | Sheridan, Daniel J. Rapp, John T. Edgemon, Anna Kate Pinkston, Jonathan W. |
description | The current study examined 98 participants' preferences for five pictorial stimuli. The researchers used a verbal multiple‐stimulus‐without‐replacement (VMSWO) preference assessment with each participant to identify high‐preference and low‐preference pictorial stimuli. Next, participants viewed each pictorial stimulus in a randomized order on a computer while using a hand dynamometer that measured the amount of force they exerted to increase or maintain the visual clarity of each image. The results indicate that over 75% of participants' force response ranks corresponded with participants' VMSWO high‐preference stimuli, VMSWO low‐preference stimuli, or both. The results of the current study provide further evidence for the use of conjugate schedules in the assessment of stimulus preference with potential for use as a reinforcer assessment. Implications along with directions for future research and limitations of the findings are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jeab.926 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3065275744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3065275744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2406-c38ac33b39c7ad728901aa3cd55729ba1dac4318b5a83c64fa50ce42f42546d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1r3DAQhkVpaDYfkF8QBL304o2-bNm5bcOmSQjkkpzNWB4vNl7Z0dik---rzVeh0ItGM_PwMjyMnUmxlEKoiw6hWhYq-8IWstB5oq2UX9kirlSSxveQHRF18VNkVn1jhzrPtY3QgnUrIiRq_YbT1G7nfiY-BmwwoHfI59dNQBoHT8ibIcRh6zlwN_hu3sCEe3yEAFM7-Eu-ivDYt-615eBrjr8n9BS7E3bQQE94-l6P2dP1-vHqJrl_-HV7tbpPnDIiS5zOwWld6cJZqK3KCyEBtKvT1KqiAlmDM1rmVQq5dplpIBUOjWqMSk1WF_qY_XjLHcPwPCNN5bYlh30PHoeZSi2yVNnUGhPR7_-g3TAHH6-LlDVKWJmLv4EuDERRTjmGdgthV0pR7v2Xe_9l9B_R8_fAudpi_Ql-CI9A8ga8tD3u_htU3q1XP_eBfwCraI-7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3074207180</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing stimulus preference using response force in a conjugate preparation: A replication and extension</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Sheridan, Daniel J. ; Rapp, John T. ; Edgemon, Anna Kate ; Pinkston, Jonathan W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheridan, Daniel J. ; Rapp, John T. ; Edgemon, Anna Kate ; Pinkston, Jonathan W.</creatorcontrib><description>The current study examined 98 participants' preferences for five pictorial stimuli. The researchers used a verbal multiple‐stimulus‐without‐replacement (VMSWO) preference assessment with each participant to identify high‐preference and low‐preference pictorial stimuli. Next, participants viewed each pictorial stimulus in a randomized order on a computer while using a hand dynamometer that measured the amount of force they exerted to increase or maintain the visual clarity of each image. The results indicate that over 75% of participants' force response ranks corresponded with participants' VMSWO high‐preference stimuli, VMSWO low‐preference stimuli, or both. The results of the current study provide further evidence for the use of conjugate schedules in the assessment of stimulus preference with potential for use as a reinforcer assessment. Implications along with directions for future research and limitations of the findings are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jeab.926</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38837371</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Choice Behavior ; conjugate reinforcement ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Photic Stimulation ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reinforcement Schedule ; Reinforcement, Psychology ; response force ; stimulus preference ; Visual stimuli ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2024-07, Vol.122 (1), p.25-41</ispartof><rights>2024 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><rights>2024 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2406-c38ac33b39c7ad728901aa3cd55729ba1dac4318b5a83c64fa50ce42f42546d93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5894-6809</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38837371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheridan, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapp, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgemon, Anna Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinkston, Jonathan W.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing stimulus preference using response force in a conjugate preparation: A replication and extension</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>The current study examined 98 participants' preferences for five pictorial stimuli. The researchers used a verbal multiple‐stimulus‐without‐replacement (VMSWO) preference assessment with each participant to identify high‐preference and low‐preference pictorial stimuli. Next, participants viewed each pictorial stimulus in a randomized order on a computer while using a hand dynamometer that measured the amount of force they exerted to increase or maintain the visual clarity of each image. The results indicate that over 75% of participants' force response ranks corresponded with participants' VMSWO high‐preference stimuli, VMSWO low‐preference stimuli, or both. The results of the current study provide further evidence for the use of conjugate schedules in the assessment of stimulus preference with potential for use as a reinforcer assessment. Implications along with directions for future research and limitations of the findings are discussed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>conjugate reinforcement</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>Reinforcement, Psychology</subject><subject>response force</subject><subject>stimulus preference</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1r3DAQhkVpaDYfkF8QBL304o2-bNm5bcOmSQjkkpzNWB4vNl7Z0dik---rzVeh0ItGM_PwMjyMnUmxlEKoiw6hWhYq-8IWstB5oq2UX9kirlSSxveQHRF18VNkVn1jhzrPtY3QgnUrIiRq_YbT1G7nfiY-BmwwoHfI59dNQBoHT8ibIcRh6zlwN_hu3sCEe3yEAFM7-Eu-ivDYt-615eBrjr8n9BS7E3bQQE94-l6P2dP1-vHqJrl_-HV7tbpPnDIiS5zOwWld6cJZqK3KCyEBtKvT1KqiAlmDM1rmVQq5dplpIBUOjWqMSk1WF_qY_XjLHcPwPCNN5bYlh30PHoeZSi2yVNnUGhPR7_-g3TAHH6-LlDVKWJmLv4EuDERRTjmGdgthV0pR7v2Xe_9l9B_R8_fAudpi_Ql-CI9A8ga8tD3u_htU3q1XP_eBfwCraI-7</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Sheridan, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Rapp, John T.</creator><creator>Edgemon, Anna Kate</creator><creator>Pinkston, Jonathan W.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-6809</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Assessing stimulus preference using response force in a conjugate preparation: A replication and extension</title><author>Sheridan, Daniel J. ; Rapp, John T. ; Edgemon, Anna Kate ; Pinkston, Jonathan W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2406-c38ac33b39c7ad728901aa3cd55729ba1dac4318b5a83c64fa50ce42f42546d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>conjugate reinforcement</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>Reinforcement, Psychology</topic><topic>response force</topic><topic>stimulus preference</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheridan, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapp, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgemon, Anna Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinkston, Jonathan W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheridan, Daniel J.</au><au>Rapp, John T.</au><au>Edgemon, Anna Kate</au><au>Pinkston, Jonathan W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing stimulus preference using response force in a conjugate preparation: A replication and extension</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>25-41</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><abstract>The current study examined 98 participants' preferences for five pictorial stimuli. The researchers used a verbal multiple‐stimulus‐without‐replacement (VMSWO) preference assessment with each participant to identify high‐preference and low‐preference pictorial stimuli. Next, participants viewed each pictorial stimulus in a randomized order on a computer while using a hand dynamometer that measured the amount of force they exerted to increase or maintain the visual clarity of each image. The results indicate that over 75% of participants' force response ranks corresponded with participants' VMSWO high‐preference stimuli, VMSWO low‐preference stimuli, or both. The results of the current study provide further evidence for the use of conjugate schedules in the assessment of stimulus preference with potential for use as a reinforcer assessment. Implications along with directions for future research and limitations of the findings are discussed.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38837371</pmid><doi>10.1002/jeab.926</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-6809</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5002 |
ispartof | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2024-07, Vol.122 (1), p.25-41 |
issn | 0022-5002 1938-3711 1938-3711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3065275744 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Choice Behavior conjugate reinforcement Female Humans Male Photic Stimulation Psychomotor Performance Reinforcement Schedule Reinforcement, Psychology response force stimulus preference Visual stimuli Young Adult |
title | Assessing stimulus preference using response force in a conjugate preparation: A replication and extension |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A20%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20stimulus%20preference%20using%20response%20force%20in%20a%20conjugate%20preparation:%20A%20replication%20and%20extension&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Sheridan,%20Daniel%20J.&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=25-41&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jeab.926&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3065275744%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2406-c38ac33b39c7ad728901aa3cd55729ba1dac4318b5a83c64fa50ce42f42546d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3074207180&rft_id=info:pmid/38837371&rfr_iscdi=true |