Survey of major complications after prone transpsoas surgery: an analysis of early adopters’ practice

• Published in: Neurosurgical review 2024-06, Vol.47 (1), p.260-260
• Main Authors: Pimenta, Luiz, Pokorny, Gabriel, Pokorny, Jullyene, Marcelino, Fernando, Moriguchi, Rafael, Barreira, Igor, Arnoni, Daniel, Mizael, Weby, Amaral, Rodrigo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Female; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neurosurgery; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Prone Position; Psoas Muscles; Spinal Fusion - adverse effects; Spinal Fusion - methods; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 1437-2320
• DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02500-2

Introduction The prone transpsoas technique (PTP) is a modification of the traditional lateral lumbar interbody fusion approach, which was first published in the literature in 2020. The technique provides several advantages, such as lordosis correction and redistribution, single-position surgery framework, and ease of performing posterior techniques when needed. However, the prone position also leads to the movement of some retroperitoneal, vascular, and neurological structures, which could impact the complication profile. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the occurrence of major complications in the practice of early adopters of the PTP approach. Methods A questionnaire containing 8 questions was sent to 50 participants and events involving early adopters of the prone transpsoas technique. Of the 50 surgeons, 32 completed the questionnaire, which totaled 1963 cases of PTP surgeries. Results Nine of the 32 surgeons experienced a major complication (28%), with persistent neurological deficit being the most frequent (7/9). Of the total number of cases, the occurrence of permanent neurological deficits was approximately 0,6%, and the rate of vascular and visceral injuries were both 0,05% (1/1963 for each case). Conclusion Based on the analysis of the questionnaire responses, it can be concluded that PTP is a safe technique with a very low rate of serious complications. However, future studies with a more heterogeneous group of surgeons and a more rigorous linkage between answers and patient data are needed to support the findings of this study.