Loading…
Postoperative pain following laser fistula closure versus ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract: A prospective double‐blinded randomized controlled trial
Background Prior studies focus primarily on surgical outcomes of anal fistula treatment, such as healing rates, rather than patient‐reported outcomes, such as postoperative pain, which could influence surgical choice. Objective To compare pain scores at 6 and 24 h postoperatively between laser closu...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of surgery 2024-08, Vol.48 (8), p.1990-1999 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Prior studies focus primarily on surgical outcomes of anal fistula treatment, such as healing rates, rather than patient‐reported outcomes, such as postoperative pain, which could influence surgical choice.
Objective
To compare pain scores at 6 and 24 h postoperatively between laser closure and ligation of the intersphincteric tract for anal fistula.
Design
Prospective, double‐blinded randomized controlled trial.
Settings
A quaternary hospital in Malaysia.
Patients
Patients aged 18–75 years with high transsphincteric fistulas.
Intervention
Fistula laser closure versus ligation of the fistula tract (LIFT) treatment.
Main Outcome Measures
Pain scores, continence, quality of life (QOL), operative time, and treatment failure were compared using chi‐square, Fisher's exact test, student t‐test, or Mann–Whitney with p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0364-2313 1432-2323 1432-2323 |
DOI: | 10.1002/wjs.12242 |