Loading…

Postoperative pain following laser fistula closure versus ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract: A prospective double‐blinded randomized controlled trial

Background Prior studies focus primarily on surgical outcomes of anal fistula treatment, such as healing rates, rather than patient‐reported outcomes, such as postoperative pain, which could influence surgical choice. Objective To compare pain scores at 6 and 24 h postoperatively between laser closu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of surgery 2024-08, Vol.48 (8), p.1990-1999
Main Authors: Low, Jolynn Qian Lin, Rajandram, Retnagowri, Aziz, Mohamed Rezal Abdul, Roslani, April Camilla
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Prior studies focus primarily on surgical outcomes of anal fistula treatment, such as healing rates, rather than patient‐reported outcomes, such as postoperative pain, which could influence surgical choice. Objective To compare pain scores at 6 and 24 h postoperatively between laser closure and ligation of the intersphincteric tract for anal fistula. Design Prospective, double‐blinded randomized controlled trial. Settings A quaternary hospital in Malaysia. Patients Patients aged 18–75 years with high transsphincteric fistulas. Intervention Fistula laser closure versus ligation of the fistula tract (LIFT) treatment. Main Outcome Measures Pain scores, continence, quality of life (QOL), operative time, and treatment failure were compared using chi‐square, Fisher's exact test, student t‐test, or Mann–Whitney with p 
ISSN:0364-2313
1432-2323
1432-2323
DOI:10.1002/wjs.12242