Exploration of different electrode types inserted in a 3D model of a patient with incomplete partition type III inner ear malformation

• Published in: International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2024-07, Vol.182, p.112015, Article 112015
• Main Authors: Rebol, Janez, Drstvenšek, Igor, Povalej Bržan, Petra, Brajlih, Tomaž
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 3D model temporal bone; Cochlear Implantation - methods; Cochlear Implants; Ear, Inner - abnormalities; Ear, Inner - surgery; Electrodes, Implanted; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Incomplete partition type III; Models, Anatomic; Perimodiolar electrode; Slim perimodiolar electrode; Slim straight electrode
• ISSN: 0165-5876; 1872-8464; 1872-8464
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112015

Incomplete partition type III (IP III) represents a rare malformation of the inner ear, posing challenges during cochlear implantation due to inevitable cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and the potential misplacement of electrodes within the internal auditory canal (IAC). Despite the absence of a consensus on electrode selection, literature suggests both straight and perimodiolar electrodes as viable options for proper insertion. Limited implantation series contribute to the ambiguity in electrode choice. In this study, we evaluated the insertion performance of three electrode types in a 3D model simulating an IP III patient's inner ear. A 3D model replicating the inner ear of a patient with IP III undergoing surgery was created, incorporating a canal wall up mastoidectomy and an enlarged round window approach. Insertions were carried out using a straight electrode, a perimodiolar electrode, and a slim perimodiolar electrode, inserted through a sheath in the basal turn of the cochlea. Electrode positions were assessed after each insertion, with each type being tested 20 times. Successful insertion rates were 95 % for the slim perimodiolar electrode, 85 % for the perimodiolar electrode, and 75 % for the slim straight electrode. Notably, the slim perimodiolar electrode required an adapted insertion technique due to the altered cochlear position in IP III cases. Statistical analysis revealed the slim perimodiolar electrode's superiority over the slim straight electrode in achieving successful insertions. The 3D model of the IP III inner ear proved to be an effective tool for electrode testing and insertion training prior to surgery. Following multiple insertions in the 3D model, the slim perimodiolar electrode demonstrated the highest success rate, emphasizing its potential as the preferred choice for cochlear implantation in IP III cases.