Loading…
FACE-Q eye module for measuring patient-reported outcomes in blepharoplasty surgery: A validation study
This study aimed to conduct a linguistic validation of all FACE-Q eye module scales in German, and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scales in patients with blepharoplasty. According to international recommendations, all FACE-Q scales and checklists were translated from English to Germ...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2024-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1006-1011 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-2169c2e4e600ded397fddffd8244fa16b0f5d3996d2cbb09e9ed5ece26a90c963 |
container_end_page | 1011 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1006 |
container_title | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Fan, Wanlin Dai, Weiwei Bechtloff, Christoph Ju, Xiaojun Li, Xueting Hou, Xincen Matos, Philomena A.Wawer Rokohl, Alexander C. Heindl, Ludwig M. |
description | This study aimed to conduct a linguistic validation of all FACE-Q eye module scales in German, and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scales in patients with blepharoplasty.
According to international recommendations, all FACE-Q scales and checklists were translated from English to German. Psychometric testing of blepharoplasty surgery-related scales of translated versions were administered to patients with blepharochalasis or dermatochalasis and a history of blepharoplasty surgery (n = 64; 11 scales) or no history of blepharoplasty surgery (n = 65; seven scales), and to a group of control subjects (n = 64; seven scales).
Most of the subscales showed acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alphas ranging from 0.75 to 0.97. Intraclass correlation coefficients were high (0.70–0.92), indicating good reliability, with total values of 0.63 (95% CI 0.46–0.76) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.53–0.80) for the upper eyelid and social function scores, respectively. There was good discriminability between pre- and post-blepharoplasty patients and normal subjects (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.06.017 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3068753591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1010518224002002</els_id><sourcerecordid>3068753591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-2169c2e4e600ded397fddffd8244fa16b0f5d3996d2cbb09e9ed5ece26a90c963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMuK3DAQRU3IkHkkP5BF0DIbOyXZlqWQTdPMCwbCQLIWslTuqLEtR5IH_PdR05Mss6qiOPdCnaL4SKGiQPmXY3U0U6wYsKYCXgHt3hRXVHSibCiVb_MOFMqWCnZZXMd4BAAOQr4rLmshOsqpuCoOd7v9bflMcEMyebuOSAYfyIQ6rsHNB7Lo5HBOZcDFh4SW-DUZP2Ekbib9iMsvHfwy6pg2kiMHDNtXsiMvenQ2R_1MYlrt9r64GPQY8cPrvCl-3t3-2D-UT9_vH_e7p9IwQVPJKJeGYYMcwKKtZTdYOwxWsKYZNOU9DG2-Sm6Z6XuQKNG2aJBxLcFIXt8Un8-9S_C_V4xJTS4aHEc9o1-jqoGLrq1bSTPKzqgJPsaAg1qCm3TYFAV1EqyO6iRYnQQr4CoLzqFPr_1rP6H9F_lrNAPfzgDmL18cBhVNFmjQuoAmKevd__r_AMXQjn8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068753591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FACE-Q eye module for measuring patient-reported outcomes in blepharoplasty surgery: A validation study</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Fan, Wanlin ; Dai, Weiwei ; Bechtloff, Christoph ; Ju, Xiaojun ; Li, Xueting ; Hou, Xincen ; Matos, Philomena A.Wawer ; Rokohl, Alexander C. ; Heindl, Ludwig M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fan, Wanlin ; Dai, Weiwei ; Bechtloff, Christoph ; Ju, Xiaojun ; Li, Xueting ; Hou, Xincen ; Matos, Philomena A.Wawer ; Rokohl, Alexander C. ; Heindl, Ludwig M.</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to conduct a linguistic validation of all FACE-Q eye module scales in German, and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scales in patients with blepharoplasty.
According to international recommendations, all FACE-Q scales and checklists were translated from English to German. Psychometric testing of blepharoplasty surgery-related scales of translated versions were administered to patients with blepharochalasis or dermatochalasis and a history of blepharoplasty surgery (n = 64; 11 scales) or no history of blepharoplasty surgery (n = 65; seven scales), and to a group of control subjects (n = 64; seven scales).
Most of the subscales showed acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alphas ranging from 0.75 to 0.97. Intraclass correlation coefficients were high (0.70–0.92), indicating good reliability, with total values of 0.63 (95% CI 0.46–0.76) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.53–0.80) for the upper eyelid and social function scores, respectively. There was good discriminability between pre- and post-blepharoplasty patients and normal subjects (p < 0.05).
The German-language version of the FACE-Q eye module is a successfully validated and helpful tool for assessing outcomes after blepharoplasty surgery, especially with respect to ‘satisfaction with overall facial appearance’, ‘psychological well-being, social function’, ‘decision satisfaction, outcome satisfaction’, and ‘early-life impact recovery’.
•Blepharoplasty is the most common aesthetic surgery.•FACE-Q is a useful patient-reported outcome instrument for evaluation of surgical and psychosocial effects after blepharoplasty surgery.•This study reports the validation of the German version of the FACE-Q module, to be applied to all German patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.06.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38871618</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Blepharoplasty ; FACE-Q ; German ; Patient-reported outcomes ; Validation</subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2024-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1006-1011</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-2169c2e4e600ded397fddffd8244fa16b0f5d3996d2cbb09e9ed5ece26a90c963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4413-6132 ; 0009-0002-6894-9071 ; 0000-0003-4780-2951 ; 0000-0001-8443-4858 ; 0000-0001-7143-6707 ; 0000-0002-0025-6036</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38871618$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fan, Wanlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Weiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechtloff, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ju, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xueting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xincen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Philomena A.Wawer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rokohl, Alexander C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heindl, Ludwig M.</creatorcontrib><title>FACE-Q eye module for measuring patient-reported outcomes in blepharoplasty surgery: A validation study</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>This study aimed to conduct a linguistic validation of all FACE-Q eye module scales in German, and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scales in patients with blepharoplasty.
According to international recommendations, all FACE-Q scales and checklists were translated from English to German. Psychometric testing of blepharoplasty surgery-related scales of translated versions were administered to patients with blepharochalasis or dermatochalasis and a history of blepharoplasty surgery (n = 64; 11 scales) or no history of blepharoplasty surgery (n = 65; seven scales), and to a group of control subjects (n = 64; seven scales).
Most of the subscales showed acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alphas ranging from 0.75 to 0.97. Intraclass correlation coefficients were high (0.70–0.92), indicating good reliability, with total values of 0.63 (95% CI 0.46–0.76) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.53–0.80) for the upper eyelid and social function scores, respectively. There was good discriminability between pre- and post-blepharoplasty patients and normal subjects (p < 0.05).
The German-language version of the FACE-Q eye module is a successfully validated and helpful tool for assessing outcomes after blepharoplasty surgery, especially with respect to ‘satisfaction with overall facial appearance’, ‘psychological well-being, social function’, ‘decision satisfaction, outcome satisfaction’, and ‘early-life impact recovery’.
•Blepharoplasty is the most common aesthetic surgery.•FACE-Q is a useful patient-reported outcome instrument for evaluation of surgical and psychosocial effects after blepharoplasty surgery.•This study reports the validation of the German version of the FACE-Q module, to be applied to all German patients.</description><subject>Blepharoplasty</subject><subject>FACE-Q</subject><subject>German</subject><subject>Patient-reported outcomes</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMuK3DAQRU3IkHkkP5BF0DIbOyXZlqWQTdPMCwbCQLIWslTuqLEtR5IH_PdR05Mss6qiOPdCnaL4SKGiQPmXY3U0U6wYsKYCXgHt3hRXVHSibCiVb_MOFMqWCnZZXMd4BAAOQr4rLmshOsqpuCoOd7v9bflMcEMyebuOSAYfyIQ6rsHNB7Lo5HBOZcDFh4SW-DUZP2Ekbib9iMsvHfwy6pg2kiMHDNtXsiMvenQ2R_1MYlrt9r64GPQY8cPrvCl-3t3-2D-UT9_vH_e7p9IwQVPJKJeGYYMcwKKtZTdYOwxWsKYZNOU9DG2-Sm6Z6XuQKNG2aJBxLcFIXt8Un8-9S_C_V4xJTS4aHEc9o1-jqoGLrq1bSTPKzqgJPsaAg1qCm3TYFAV1EqyO6iRYnQQr4CoLzqFPr_1rP6H9F_lrNAPfzgDmL18cBhVNFmjQuoAmKevd__r_AMXQjn8</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Fan, Wanlin</creator><creator>Dai, Weiwei</creator><creator>Bechtloff, Christoph</creator><creator>Ju, Xiaojun</creator><creator>Li, Xueting</creator><creator>Hou, Xincen</creator><creator>Matos, Philomena A.Wawer</creator><creator>Rokohl, Alexander C.</creator><creator>Heindl, Ludwig M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4413-6132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6894-9071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-2951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8443-4858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7143-6707</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0025-6036</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>FACE-Q eye module for measuring patient-reported outcomes in blepharoplasty surgery: A validation study</title><author>Fan, Wanlin ; Dai, Weiwei ; Bechtloff, Christoph ; Ju, Xiaojun ; Li, Xueting ; Hou, Xincen ; Matos, Philomena A.Wawer ; Rokohl, Alexander C. ; Heindl, Ludwig M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-2169c2e4e600ded397fddffd8244fa16b0f5d3996d2cbb09e9ed5ece26a90c963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Blepharoplasty</topic><topic>FACE-Q</topic><topic>German</topic><topic>Patient-reported outcomes</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fan, Wanlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Weiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechtloff, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ju, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xueting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xincen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Philomena A.Wawer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rokohl, Alexander C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heindl, Ludwig M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fan, Wanlin</au><au>Dai, Weiwei</au><au>Bechtloff, Christoph</au><au>Ju, Xiaojun</au><au>Li, Xueting</au><au>Hou, Xincen</au><au>Matos, Philomena A.Wawer</au><au>Rokohl, Alexander C.</au><au>Heindl, Ludwig M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FACE-Q eye module for measuring patient-reported outcomes in blepharoplasty surgery: A validation study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1006</spage><epage>1011</epage><pages>1006-1011</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to conduct a linguistic validation of all FACE-Q eye module scales in German, and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scales in patients with blepharoplasty.
According to international recommendations, all FACE-Q scales and checklists were translated from English to German. Psychometric testing of blepharoplasty surgery-related scales of translated versions were administered to patients with blepharochalasis or dermatochalasis and a history of blepharoplasty surgery (n = 64; 11 scales) or no history of blepharoplasty surgery (n = 65; seven scales), and to a group of control subjects (n = 64; seven scales).
Most of the subscales showed acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alphas ranging from 0.75 to 0.97. Intraclass correlation coefficients were high (0.70–0.92), indicating good reliability, with total values of 0.63 (95% CI 0.46–0.76) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.53–0.80) for the upper eyelid and social function scores, respectively. There was good discriminability between pre- and post-blepharoplasty patients and normal subjects (p < 0.05).
The German-language version of the FACE-Q eye module is a successfully validated and helpful tool for assessing outcomes after blepharoplasty surgery, especially with respect to ‘satisfaction with overall facial appearance’, ‘psychological well-being, social function’, ‘decision satisfaction, outcome satisfaction’, and ‘early-life impact recovery’.
•Blepharoplasty is the most common aesthetic surgery.•FACE-Q is a useful patient-reported outcome instrument for evaluation of surgical and psychosocial effects after blepharoplasty surgery.•This study reports the validation of the German version of the FACE-Q module, to be applied to all German patients.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38871618</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcms.2024.06.017</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4413-6132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6894-9071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-2951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8443-4858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7143-6707</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0025-6036</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-5182 |
ispartof | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2024-09, Vol.52 (9), p.1006-1011 |
issn | 1010-5182 1878-4119 1878-4119 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3068753591 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Blepharoplasty FACE-Q German Patient-reported outcomes Validation |
title | FACE-Q eye module for measuring patient-reported outcomes in blepharoplasty surgery: A validation study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A26%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FACE-Q%20eye%20module%20for%20measuring%20patient-reported%20outcomes%20in%20blepharoplasty%20surgery:%20A%20validation%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Fan,%20Wanlin&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1006&rft.epage=1011&rft.pages=1006-1011&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcms.2024.06.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3068753591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-2169c2e4e600ded397fddffd8244fa16b0f5d3996d2cbb09e9ed5ece26a90c963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068753591&rft_id=info:pmid/38871618&rfr_iscdi=true |