Biofidelity and Limitations of Instrumented Mouthguard Systems for Assessment of Rigid Body Head Kinematics

• Published in: Annals of biomedical engineering 2024-10, Vol.52 (10), p.2872-2883
• Main Authors: Abrams, Mitchell Z., Venkatraman, Jay, Sherman, Donald, Ortiz-Paparoni, Maria, Bercaw, Jefferson R., MacDonald, Robert E., Kait, Jason, Dimbath, Elizabeth D., Pang, Derek Y., Gray, Alexandra, Luck, Jason F., Bir, Cynthia A., Bass, Cameron R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Angular acceleration; Angular velocity; Biochemistry; Biological and Medical Physics; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering; Biomedicine; Biometrics; Biophysics; Cadavers; Center of gravity; Classical Mechanics; Error analysis; Human performance; Kinematics; Mouthguards; Protective equipment; Reference systems; Rigid structures; S.I. : Concussions II
• ISSN: 0090-6964; 1573-9686; 1573-9686
• DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03563-4

Instrumented mouthguard systems (iMGs) are commonly used to study rigid body head kinematics across a variety of athletic environments. Previous work has found good fidelity for iMGs rigidly fixed to anthropomorphic test device (ATD) headforms when compared to reference systems, but few validation studies have focused on iMG performance in human cadaver heads. Here, we examine the performance of two boil-and-bite style iMGs in helmeted cadaver heads. Three unembalmed human cadaver heads were fitted with two instrumented boil-and-bite mouthguards [Prevent Biometrics and Diversified Technical Systems (DTS)] per manufacturer instructions. Reference sensors were rigidly fixed to each specimen. Specimens were fitted with a Riddell SpeedFlex American football helmet and impacted with a rigid impactor at three velocities and locations. All impact kinematics were compared at the head center of gravity. The Prevent iMG performed comparably to the reference system up to ~ 60 g in linear acceleration, but overall had poor correlation (CCC = 0.39). Prevent iMG angular velocity and BrIC generally well correlated with the reference, while underestimating HIC and overestimating HIC duration. The DTS iMG consistently overestimated the reference across all measures, with linear acceleration error ranging from 10 to 66%, and angular acceleration errors greater than 300%. Neither iMG demonstrated consistent agreement with the reference system. While iMG validation efforts have utilized ATD testing, this study highlights the need for cadaver testing and validation of devices intended for use in-vivo, particularly when considering realistic (non-idealized) sensor-skull coupling, when accounting for interactions with the mandible and when subject-specific anatomy may affect device performance.