Loading…
Radiographic assessment of the peri‐implant site
While peri‐implant mucositis relies solely on clinical parameters, radiological assessment becomes indispensable for diagnosing peri‐implantitis. Intraoral radiography, with its simplicity of application, low radiation exposure, and adequate representation of peri‐implant structures, stands out as t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Periodontology 2000 2024-06, Vol.95 (1), p.70-86 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2157-14d93057bd029f255f4cb8e2df3151f180cb3497a637a0637285ea9a335aba583 |
container_end_page | 86 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 70 |
container_title | Periodontology 2000 |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Sahrmann, Philipp Kühl, Sebastian Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea Bornstein, Michael M. Zitzmann, Nicola U. |
description | While peri‐implant mucositis relies solely on clinical parameters, radiological assessment becomes indispensable for diagnosing peri‐implantitis. Intraoral radiography, with its simplicity of application, low radiation exposure, and adequate representation of peri‐implant structures, stands out as the standard of care for both immediate and follow‐up assessments. Standardization by custom‐made radiologic splints allows for excellent comparability with previous images and allows for the determination of even small changes in contour and density of the peri‐implant bone. Furthermore, other radiographic modalities like panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) may provide useful features for specific patients and clinical cases while also showing innate limitations. Beyond the assessment of the marginal peri‐implant bone level as the crucial parameter of clinical relevance, radiologic assessment may reveal various other findings related to the prosthetic restoration itself, the precision of its fit to the implant, and the peri‐implant soft and hard tissues. Since such findings can be crucial for the assessment of peri‐implant health and the implants' prognosis, a systematic diagnostic evaluation pathway for a thorough assessment is recommended to extract all relevant information from radiologic imaging. This article also provides an overview of the clinical and chronological indications for different imaging modalities in peri‐implant issues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/prd.12577 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3074728048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3074728048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2157-14d93057bd029f255f4cb8e2df3151f180cb3497a637a0637285ea9a335aba583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQRi0EoqWw4AIoS1ikHdtxHC9R-ZWQQBWsLSe2qVFCgp0KdccROCMnwSWFHV6MNaM3T6MPoWMMUxzfrPN6ignjfAeNcQ6QAmd8F41BQJ7mHNMROgjhBQBzQdk-GtFCMCwYGSOyUNq1z151S1clKgQTQmNe-6S1Sb80SWe8-_r4dE1XqzgNrjeHaM-qOpij7T9BT1eXj_Ob9O7--nZ-fpdWBDOe4kwLCoyXGoiwhDGbVWVhiLYUM2xxAVVJM8FVTrmCWEjBjBKKUqZKxQo6QaeDt_Pt28qEXjYuVKaOh5h2FSQFnsUlyDbo2YBWvg3BGys77xrl1xKD3EQUey1_IorsyVa7Khuj_8jfTCIwG4B3V5v1_yb5sLgYlN8Fi299</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3074728048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiographic assessment of the peri‐implant site</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Sahrmann, Philipp ; Kühl, Sebastian ; Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea ; Bornstein, Michael M. ; Zitzmann, Nicola U.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sahrmann, Philipp ; Kühl, Sebastian ; Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea ; Bornstein, Michael M. ; Zitzmann, Nicola U.</creatorcontrib><description>While peri‐implant mucositis relies solely on clinical parameters, radiological assessment becomes indispensable for diagnosing peri‐implantitis. Intraoral radiography, with its simplicity of application, low radiation exposure, and adequate representation of peri‐implant structures, stands out as the standard of care for both immediate and follow‐up assessments. Standardization by custom‐made radiologic splints allows for excellent comparability with previous images and allows for the determination of even small changes in contour and density of the peri‐implant bone. Furthermore, other radiographic modalities like panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) may provide useful features for specific patients and clinical cases while also showing innate limitations. Beyond the assessment of the marginal peri‐implant bone level as the crucial parameter of clinical relevance, radiologic assessment may reveal various other findings related to the prosthetic restoration itself, the precision of its fit to the implant, and the peri‐implant soft and hard tissues. Since such findings can be crucial for the assessment of peri‐implant health and the implants' prognosis, a systematic diagnostic evaluation pathway for a thorough assessment is recommended to extract all relevant information from radiologic imaging. This article also provides an overview of the clinical and chronological indications for different imaging modalities in peri‐implant issues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0906-6713</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/prd.12577</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38951952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>cone beam computed tomography ; diagnosis ; peri‐implantitis ; radiography</subject><ispartof>Periodontology 2000, 2024-06, Vol.95 (1), p.70-86</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Periodontology 2000 published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2157-14d93057bd029f255f4cb8e2df3151f180cb3497a637a0637285ea9a335aba583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38951952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sahrmann, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühl, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornstein, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitzmann, Nicola U.</creatorcontrib><title>Radiographic assessment of the peri‐implant site</title><title>Periodontology 2000</title><addtitle>Periodontol 2000</addtitle><description>While peri‐implant mucositis relies solely on clinical parameters, radiological assessment becomes indispensable for diagnosing peri‐implantitis. Intraoral radiography, with its simplicity of application, low radiation exposure, and adequate representation of peri‐implant structures, stands out as the standard of care for both immediate and follow‐up assessments. Standardization by custom‐made radiologic splints allows for excellent comparability with previous images and allows for the determination of even small changes in contour and density of the peri‐implant bone. Furthermore, other radiographic modalities like panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) may provide useful features for specific patients and clinical cases while also showing innate limitations. Beyond the assessment of the marginal peri‐implant bone level as the crucial parameter of clinical relevance, radiologic assessment may reveal various other findings related to the prosthetic restoration itself, the precision of its fit to the implant, and the peri‐implant soft and hard tissues. Since such findings can be crucial for the assessment of peri‐implant health and the implants' prognosis, a systematic diagnostic evaluation pathway for a thorough assessment is recommended to extract all relevant information from radiologic imaging. This article also provides an overview of the clinical and chronological indications for different imaging modalities in peri‐implant issues.</description><subject>cone beam computed tomography</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>peri‐implantitis</subject><subject>radiography</subject><issn>0906-6713</issn><issn>1600-0757</issn><issn>1600-0757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQRi0EoqWw4AIoS1ikHdtxHC9R-ZWQQBWsLSe2qVFCgp0KdccROCMnwSWFHV6MNaM3T6MPoWMMUxzfrPN6ignjfAeNcQ6QAmd8F41BQJ7mHNMROgjhBQBzQdk-GtFCMCwYGSOyUNq1z151S1clKgQTQmNe-6S1Sb80SWe8-_r4dE1XqzgNrjeHaM-qOpij7T9BT1eXj_Ob9O7--nZ-fpdWBDOe4kwLCoyXGoiwhDGbVWVhiLYUM2xxAVVJM8FVTrmCWEjBjBKKUqZKxQo6QaeDt_Pt28qEXjYuVKaOh5h2FSQFnsUlyDbo2YBWvg3BGys77xrl1xKD3EQUey1_IorsyVa7Khuj_8jfTCIwG4B3V5v1_yb5sLgYlN8Fi299</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Sahrmann, Philipp</creator><creator>Kühl, Sebastian</creator><creator>Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea</creator><creator>Bornstein, Michael M.</creator><creator>Zitzmann, Nicola U.</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Radiographic assessment of the peri‐implant site</title><author>Sahrmann, Philipp ; Kühl, Sebastian ; Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea ; Bornstein, Michael M. ; Zitzmann, Nicola U.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2157-14d93057bd029f255f4cb8e2df3151f180cb3497a637a0637285ea9a335aba583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>cone beam computed tomography</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>peri‐implantitis</topic><topic>radiography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sahrmann, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühl, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornstein, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitzmann, Nicola U.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Periodontology 2000</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sahrmann, Philipp</au><au>Kühl, Sebastian</au><au>Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea</au><au>Bornstein, Michael M.</au><au>Zitzmann, Nicola U.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiographic assessment of the peri‐implant site</atitle><jtitle>Periodontology 2000</jtitle><addtitle>Periodontol 2000</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>70-86</pages><issn>0906-6713</issn><issn>1600-0757</issn><eissn>1600-0757</eissn><abstract>While peri‐implant mucositis relies solely on clinical parameters, radiological assessment becomes indispensable for diagnosing peri‐implantitis. Intraoral radiography, with its simplicity of application, low radiation exposure, and adequate representation of peri‐implant structures, stands out as the standard of care for both immediate and follow‐up assessments. Standardization by custom‐made radiologic splints allows for excellent comparability with previous images and allows for the determination of even small changes in contour and density of the peri‐implant bone. Furthermore, other radiographic modalities like panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) may provide useful features for specific patients and clinical cases while also showing innate limitations. Beyond the assessment of the marginal peri‐implant bone level as the crucial parameter of clinical relevance, radiologic assessment may reveal various other findings related to the prosthetic restoration itself, the precision of its fit to the implant, and the peri‐implant soft and hard tissues. Since such findings can be crucial for the assessment of peri‐implant health and the implants' prognosis, a systematic diagnostic evaluation pathway for a thorough assessment is recommended to extract all relevant information from radiologic imaging. This article also provides an overview of the clinical and chronological indications for different imaging modalities in peri‐implant issues.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>38951952</pmid><doi>10.1111/prd.12577</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0906-6713 |
ispartof | Periodontology 2000, 2024-06, Vol.95 (1), p.70-86 |
issn | 0906-6713 1600-0757 1600-0757 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3074728048 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | cone beam computed tomography diagnosis peri‐implantitis radiography |
title | Radiographic assessment of the peri‐implant site |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T05%3A31%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiographic%20assessment%20of%20the%20peri%E2%80%90implant%20site&rft.jtitle=Periodontology%202000&rft.au=Sahrmann,%20Philipp&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=70-86&rft.issn=0906-6713&rft.eissn=1600-0757&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/prd.12577&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3074728048%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2157-14d93057bd029f255f4cb8e2df3151f180cb3497a637a0637285ea9a335aba583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3074728048&rft_id=info:pmid/38951952&rfr_iscdi=true |