Loading…

Radiographic assessment of the peri‐implant site

While peri‐implant mucositis relies solely on clinical parameters, radiological assessment becomes indispensable for diagnosing peri‐implantitis. Intraoral radiography, with its simplicity of application, low radiation exposure, and adequate representation of peri‐implant structures, stands out as t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Periodontology 2000 2024-06, Vol.95 (1), p.70-86
Main Authors: Sahrmann, Philipp, Kühl, Sebastian, Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea, Bornstein, Michael M., Zitzmann, Nicola U.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2157-14d93057bd029f255f4cb8e2df3151f180cb3497a637a0637285ea9a335aba583
container_end_page 86
container_issue 1
container_start_page 70
container_title Periodontology 2000
container_volume 95
creator Sahrmann, Philipp
Kühl, Sebastian
Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea
Bornstein, Michael M.
Zitzmann, Nicola U.
description While peri‐implant mucositis relies solely on clinical parameters, radiological assessment becomes indispensable for diagnosing peri‐implantitis. Intraoral radiography, with its simplicity of application, low radiation exposure, and adequate representation of peri‐implant structures, stands out as the standard of care for both immediate and follow‐up assessments. Standardization by custom‐made radiologic splints allows for excellent comparability with previous images and allows for the determination of even small changes in contour and density of the peri‐implant bone. Furthermore, other radiographic modalities like panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) may provide useful features for specific patients and clinical cases while also showing innate limitations. Beyond the assessment of the marginal peri‐implant bone level as the crucial parameter of clinical relevance, radiologic assessment may reveal various other findings related to the prosthetic restoration itself, the precision of its fit to the implant, and the peri‐implant soft and hard tissues. Since such findings can be crucial for the assessment of peri‐implant health and the implants' prognosis, a systematic diagnostic evaluation pathway for a thorough assessment is recommended to extract all relevant information from radiologic imaging. This article also provides an overview of the clinical and chronological indications for different imaging modalities in peri‐implant issues.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/prd.12577
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3074728048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3074728048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2157-14d93057bd029f255f4cb8e2df3151f180cb3497a637a0637285ea9a335aba583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQRi0EoqWw4AIoS1ikHdtxHC9R-ZWQQBWsLSe2qVFCgp0KdccROCMnwSWFHV6MNaM3T6MPoWMMUxzfrPN6ignjfAeNcQ6QAmd8F41BQJ7mHNMROgjhBQBzQdk-GtFCMCwYGSOyUNq1z151S1clKgQTQmNe-6S1Sb80SWe8-_r4dE1XqzgNrjeHaM-qOpij7T9BT1eXj_Ob9O7--nZ-fpdWBDOe4kwLCoyXGoiwhDGbVWVhiLYUM2xxAVVJM8FVTrmCWEjBjBKKUqZKxQo6QaeDt_Pt28qEXjYuVKaOh5h2FSQFnsUlyDbo2YBWvg3BGys77xrl1xKD3EQUey1_IorsyVa7Khuj_8jfTCIwG4B3V5v1_yb5sLgYlN8Fi299</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3074728048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiographic assessment of the peri‐implant site</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Sahrmann, Philipp ; Kühl, Sebastian ; Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea ; Bornstein, Michael M. ; Zitzmann, Nicola U.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sahrmann, Philipp ; Kühl, Sebastian ; Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea ; Bornstein, Michael M. ; Zitzmann, Nicola U.</creatorcontrib><description>While peri‐implant mucositis relies solely on clinical parameters, radiological assessment becomes indispensable for diagnosing peri‐implantitis. Intraoral radiography, with its simplicity of application, low radiation exposure, and adequate representation of peri‐implant structures, stands out as the standard of care for both immediate and follow‐up assessments. Standardization by custom‐made radiologic splints allows for excellent comparability with previous images and allows for the determination of even small changes in contour and density of the peri‐implant bone. Furthermore, other radiographic modalities like panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) may provide useful features for specific patients and clinical cases while also showing innate limitations. Beyond the assessment of the marginal peri‐implant bone level as the crucial parameter of clinical relevance, radiologic assessment may reveal various other findings related to the prosthetic restoration itself, the precision of its fit to the implant, and the peri‐implant soft and hard tissues. Since such findings can be crucial for the assessment of peri‐implant health and the implants' prognosis, a systematic diagnostic evaluation pathway for a thorough assessment is recommended to extract all relevant information from radiologic imaging. This article also provides an overview of the clinical and chronological indications for different imaging modalities in peri‐implant issues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0906-6713</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/prd.12577</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38951952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>cone beam computed tomography ; diagnosis ; peri‐implantitis ; radiography</subject><ispartof>Periodontology 2000, 2024-06, Vol.95 (1), p.70-86</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Periodontology 2000 published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2157-14d93057bd029f255f4cb8e2df3151f180cb3497a637a0637285ea9a335aba583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38951952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sahrmann, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühl, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornstein, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitzmann, Nicola U.</creatorcontrib><title>Radiographic assessment of the peri‐implant site</title><title>Periodontology 2000</title><addtitle>Periodontol 2000</addtitle><description>While peri‐implant mucositis relies solely on clinical parameters, radiological assessment becomes indispensable for diagnosing peri‐implantitis. Intraoral radiography, with its simplicity of application, low radiation exposure, and adequate representation of peri‐implant structures, stands out as the standard of care for both immediate and follow‐up assessments. Standardization by custom‐made radiologic splints allows for excellent comparability with previous images and allows for the determination of even small changes in contour and density of the peri‐implant bone. Furthermore, other radiographic modalities like panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) may provide useful features for specific patients and clinical cases while also showing innate limitations. Beyond the assessment of the marginal peri‐implant bone level as the crucial parameter of clinical relevance, radiologic assessment may reveal various other findings related to the prosthetic restoration itself, the precision of its fit to the implant, and the peri‐implant soft and hard tissues. Since such findings can be crucial for the assessment of peri‐implant health and the implants' prognosis, a systematic diagnostic evaluation pathway for a thorough assessment is recommended to extract all relevant information from radiologic imaging. This article also provides an overview of the clinical and chronological indications for different imaging modalities in peri‐implant issues.</description><subject>cone beam computed tomography</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>peri‐implantitis</subject><subject>radiography</subject><issn>0906-6713</issn><issn>1600-0757</issn><issn>1600-0757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQRi0EoqWw4AIoS1ikHdtxHC9R-ZWQQBWsLSe2qVFCgp0KdccROCMnwSWFHV6MNaM3T6MPoWMMUxzfrPN6ignjfAeNcQ6QAmd8F41BQJ7mHNMROgjhBQBzQdk-GtFCMCwYGSOyUNq1z151S1clKgQTQmNe-6S1Sb80SWe8-_r4dE1XqzgNrjeHaM-qOpij7T9BT1eXj_Ob9O7--nZ-fpdWBDOe4kwLCoyXGoiwhDGbVWVhiLYUM2xxAVVJM8FVTrmCWEjBjBKKUqZKxQo6QaeDt_Pt28qEXjYuVKaOh5h2FSQFnsUlyDbo2YBWvg3BGys77xrl1xKD3EQUey1_IorsyVa7Khuj_8jfTCIwG4B3V5v1_yb5sLgYlN8Fi299</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Sahrmann, Philipp</creator><creator>Kühl, Sebastian</creator><creator>Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea</creator><creator>Bornstein, Michael M.</creator><creator>Zitzmann, Nicola U.</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Radiographic assessment of the peri‐implant site</title><author>Sahrmann, Philipp ; Kühl, Sebastian ; Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea ; Bornstein, Michael M. ; Zitzmann, Nicola U.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2157-14d93057bd029f255f4cb8e2df3151f180cb3497a637a0637285ea9a335aba583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>cone beam computed tomography</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>peri‐implantitis</topic><topic>radiography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sahrmann, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühl, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornstein, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitzmann, Nicola U.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Periodontology 2000</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sahrmann, Philipp</au><au>Kühl, Sebastian</au><au>Dagassan‐Berndt, Dorothea</au><au>Bornstein, Michael M.</au><au>Zitzmann, Nicola U.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiographic assessment of the peri‐implant site</atitle><jtitle>Periodontology 2000</jtitle><addtitle>Periodontol 2000</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>70-86</pages><issn>0906-6713</issn><issn>1600-0757</issn><eissn>1600-0757</eissn><abstract>While peri‐implant mucositis relies solely on clinical parameters, radiological assessment becomes indispensable for diagnosing peri‐implantitis. Intraoral radiography, with its simplicity of application, low radiation exposure, and adequate representation of peri‐implant structures, stands out as the standard of care for both immediate and follow‐up assessments. Standardization by custom‐made radiologic splints allows for excellent comparability with previous images and allows for the determination of even small changes in contour and density of the peri‐implant bone. Furthermore, other radiographic modalities like panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) may provide useful features for specific patients and clinical cases while also showing innate limitations. Beyond the assessment of the marginal peri‐implant bone level as the crucial parameter of clinical relevance, radiologic assessment may reveal various other findings related to the prosthetic restoration itself, the precision of its fit to the implant, and the peri‐implant soft and hard tissues. Since such findings can be crucial for the assessment of peri‐implant health and the implants' prognosis, a systematic diagnostic evaluation pathway for a thorough assessment is recommended to extract all relevant information from radiologic imaging. This article also provides an overview of the clinical and chronological indications for different imaging modalities in peri‐implant issues.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>38951952</pmid><doi>10.1111/prd.12577</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0906-6713
ispartof Periodontology 2000, 2024-06, Vol.95 (1), p.70-86
issn 0906-6713
1600-0757
1600-0757
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3074728048
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects cone beam computed tomography
diagnosis
peri‐implantitis
radiography
title Radiographic assessment of the peri‐implant site
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T05%3A31%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiographic%20assessment%20of%20the%20peri%E2%80%90implant%20site&rft.jtitle=Periodontology%202000&rft.au=Sahrmann,%20Philipp&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=70-86&rft.issn=0906-6713&rft.eissn=1600-0757&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/prd.12577&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3074728048%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2157-14d93057bd029f255f4cb8e2df3151f180cb3497a637a0637285ea9a335aba583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3074728048&rft_id=info:pmid/38951952&rfr_iscdi=true