Loading…

Discrete Choice Experiments to Elicit Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review

Individual preferences for treatment options for major depressive disorder can impact therapeutic decision making, adherence, and ultimately outcomes. This systematic review of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) on patient preferences for major depressive disorder treatment assessed the range of DCE...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The patient : patient-centered outcomes research 2025-01, Vol.18 (1), p.19
Main Authors: dosReis, Susan, Espinal Pena, Dafne, Fincannon, Alexandra, Gorman, Emily F, Amill-Rosario, Alejandro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-fc8e155e7d267c55a6e6df160fdd7e4a8dfb666361a1b5a94563bf226c3aa4fd3
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title The patient : patient-centered outcomes research
container_volume 18
creator dosReis, Susan
Espinal Pena, Dafne
Fincannon, Alexandra
Gorman, Emily F
Amill-Rosario, Alejandro
description Individual preferences for treatment options for major depressive disorder can impact therapeutic decision making, adherence, and ultimately outcomes. This systematic review of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) on patient preferences for major depressive disorder treatment assessed the range of DCE applications in major depressive disorder to document patient stakeholder involvement in DCE development and to identify the relative importance of treatment attributes. We searched MEDLINE via Ovid (1946-present), EMBASE (Elsevier interface), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley interface), and PsycINFO (EBSCO interface) databases on 29 May, 2024. Covidence software facilitated the review, which four members completed independently. The review was conducted in two phases: title and abstract and then a full-text review. We used an established quality reporting tool to evaluate selected articles. The Covidence extraction tool was adapted for this study. A total of 19 articles were included in this review. Most studies elicited preferences for depression treatment (63.2%) and care delivery (10.5%). Two assessed willingness to pay. Individuals prefer a combination of medicine and counseling over each treatment alone. Treatment efficacy, relapse prevention, and symptom relief were among the most important attributes. Individuals were willing to accept larger risks to achieve symptom improvement. Few studies examined preference heterogeneity with latent subgroups. Discrete choice experiments for major depressive disorder treatment preferences enable an assessment of trade-offs for first-line therapeutic options. Patient stakeholders are infrequently involved as collaborators in the DCE development. Few examined preference heterogeneity among subgroups.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40271-024-00706-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3076286385</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3076286385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-fc8e155e7d267c55a6e6df160fdd7e4a8dfb666361a1b5a94563bf226c3aa4fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPAjEUhRujEUT_gAvTpZvRdjpzp7gjgI8EI1FcN6VzG4YwDLYFZeF_t4iyus9zkvMRcsnZDWesuPUZSwuesDRL4sgggSPS5ryQCQfgx4c-Fy1y5v2cMYgHOCUtIbvQlYVsk-9B5Y3DgLQ_ayqDdPi1QlfVuAyehoYOF5WpAh3rUMUVHTu06HBp0FPbOBpmSCcOddgJaGPps57H9QBXDr2vNkijf-NKdHe0R9-2PmAdrQx9xU2Fn-fkxOqFx4u_2iHv98NJ_zEZvTw89XujxHCZhcQaiTzPsShTKEyea0AoLQdmy7LATMvSTmMwAVzzaa67WQ5iatMUjNA6s6XokOu978o1H2v0QdUxNi4WeonN2ivBCkglCJnH13T_alzjfYyrVhGHdlvFmdphV3vsKmJXv9gVRNHVn_96WmN5kPxzFj92zX_K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3076286385</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discrete Choice Experiments to Elicit Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>dosReis, Susan ; Espinal Pena, Dafne ; Fincannon, Alexandra ; Gorman, Emily F ; Amill-Rosario, Alejandro</creator><creatorcontrib>dosReis, Susan ; Espinal Pena, Dafne ; Fincannon, Alexandra ; Gorman, Emily F ; Amill-Rosario, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><description>Individual preferences for treatment options for major depressive disorder can impact therapeutic decision making, adherence, and ultimately outcomes. This systematic review of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) on patient preferences for major depressive disorder treatment assessed the range of DCE applications in major depressive disorder to document patient stakeholder involvement in DCE development and to identify the relative importance of treatment attributes. We searched MEDLINE via Ovid (1946-present), EMBASE (Elsevier interface), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley interface), and PsycINFO (EBSCO interface) databases on 29 May, 2024. Covidence software facilitated the review, which four members completed independently. The review was conducted in two phases: title and abstract and then a full-text review. We used an established quality reporting tool to evaluate selected articles. The Covidence extraction tool was adapted for this study. A total of 19 articles were included in this review. Most studies elicited preferences for depression treatment (63.2%) and care delivery (10.5%). Two assessed willingness to pay. Individuals prefer a combination of medicine and counseling over each treatment alone. Treatment efficacy, relapse prevention, and symptom relief were among the most important attributes. Individuals were willing to accept larger risks to achieve symptom improvement. Few studies examined preference heterogeneity with latent subgroups. Discrete choice experiments for major depressive disorder treatment preferences enable an assessment of trade-offs for first-line therapeutic options. Patient stakeholders are infrequently involved as collaborators in the DCE development. Few examined preference heterogeneity among subgroups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-1653</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1178-1661</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-1661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00706-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38969878</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand</publisher><subject>Adult ; Choice Behavior ; Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Preference</subject><ispartof>The patient : patient-centered outcomes research, 2025-01, Vol.18 (1), p.19</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-fc8e155e7d267c55a6e6df160fdd7e4a8dfb666361a1b5a94563bf226c3aa4fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1210-1082 ; 0000-0003-2210-6650 ; 0000-0002-1070-8227</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38969878$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>dosReis, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinal Pena, Dafne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fincannon, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorman, Emily F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amill-Rosario, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><title>Discrete Choice Experiments to Elicit Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review</title><title>The patient : patient-centered outcomes research</title><addtitle>Patient</addtitle><description>Individual preferences for treatment options for major depressive disorder can impact therapeutic decision making, adherence, and ultimately outcomes. This systematic review of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) on patient preferences for major depressive disorder treatment assessed the range of DCE applications in major depressive disorder to document patient stakeholder involvement in DCE development and to identify the relative importance of treatment attributes. We searched MEDLINE via Ovid (1946-present), EMBASE (Elsevier interface), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley interface), and PsycINFO (EBSCO interface) databases on 29 May, 2024. Covidence software facilitated the review, which four members completed independently. The review was conducted in two phases: title and abstract and then a full-text review. We used an established quality reporting tool to evaluate selected articles. The Covidence extraction tool was adapted for this study. A total of 19 articles were included in this review. Most studies elicited preferences for depression treatment (63.2%) and care delivery (10.5%). Two assessed willingness to pay. Individuals prefer a combination of medicine and counseling over each treatment alone. Treatment efficacy, relapse prevention, and symptom relief were among the most important attributes. Individuals were willing to accept larger risks to achieve symptom improvement. Few studies examined preference heterogeneity with latent subgroups. Discrete choice experiments for major depressive disorder treatment preferences enable an assessment of trade-offs for first-line therapeutic options. Patient stakeholders are infrequently involved as collaborators in the DCE development. Few examined preference heterogeneity among subgroups.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><issn>1178-1653</issn><issn>1178-1661</issn><issn>1178-1661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtPAjEUhRujEUT_gAvTpZvRdjpzp7gjgI8EI1FcN6VzG4YwDLYFZeF_t4iyus9zkvMRcsnZDWesuPUZSwuesDRL4sgggSPS5ryQCQfgx4c-Fy1y5v2cMYgHOCUtIbvQlYVsk-9B5Y3DgLQ_ayqDdPi1QlfVuAyehoYOF5WpAh3rUMUVHTu06HBp0FPbOBpmSCcOddgJaGPps57H9QBXDr2vNkijf-NKdHe0R9-2PmAdrQx9xU2Fn-fkxOqFx4u_2iHv98NJ_zEZvTw89XujxHCZhcQaiTzPsShTKEyea0AoLQdmy7LATMvSTmMwAVzzaa67WQ5iatMUjNA6s6XokOu978o1H2v0QdUxNi4WeonN2ivBCkglCJnH13T_alzjfYyrVhGHdlvFmdphV3vsKmJXv9gVRNHVn_96WmN5kPxzFj92zX_K</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>dosReis, Susan</creator><creator>Espinal Pena, Dafne</creator><creator>Fincannon, Alexandra</creator><creator>Gorman, Emily F</creator><creator>Amill-Rosario, Alejandro</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1210-1082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2210-6650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1070-8227</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Discrete Choice Experiments to Elicit Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review</title><author>dosReis, Susan ; Espinal Pena, Dafne ; Fincannon, Alexandra ; Gorman, Emily F ; Amill-Rosario, Alejandro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-fc8e155e7d267c55a6e6df160fdd7e4a8dfb666361a1b5a94563bf226c3aa4fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>dosReis, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinal Pena, Dafne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fincannon, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorman, Emily F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amill-Rosario, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The patient : patient-centered outcomes research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>dosReis, Susan</au><au>Espinal Pena, Dafne</au><au>Fincannon, Alexandra</au><au>Gorman, Emily F</au><au>Amill-Rosario, Alejandro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discrete Choice Experiments to Elicit Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>The patient : patient-centered outcomes research</jtitle><addtitle>Patient</addtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><pages>19-</pages><issn>1178-1653</issn><issn>1178-1661</issn><eissn>1178-1661</eissn><abstract>Individual preferences for treatment options for major depressive disorder can impact therapeutic decision making, adherence, and ultimately outcomes. This systematic review of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) on patient preferences for major depressive disorder treatment assessed the range of DCE applications in major depressive disorder to document patient stakeholder involvement in DCE development and to identify the relative importance of treatment attributes. We searched MEDLINE via Ovid (1946-present), EMBASE (Elsevier interface), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley interface), and PsycINFO (EBSCO interface) databases on 29 May, 2024. Covidence software facilitated the review, which four members completed independently. The review was conducted in two phases: title and abstract and then a full-text review. We used an established quality reporting tool to evaluate selected articles. The Covidence extraction tool was adapted for this study. A total of 19 articles were included in this review. Most studies elicited preferences for depression treatment (63.2%) and care delivery (10.5%). Two assessed willingness to pay. Individuals prefer a combination of medicine and counseling over each treatment alone. Treatment efficacy, relapse prevention, and symptom relief were among the most important attributes. Individuals were willing to accept larger risks to achieve symptom improvement. Few studies examined preference heterogeneity with latent subgroups. Discrete choice experiments for major depressive disorder treatment preferences enable an assessment of trade-offs for first-line therapeutic options. Patient stakeholders are infrequently involved as collaborators in the DCE development. Few examined preference heterogeneity among subgroups.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pmid>38969878</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40271-024-00706-6</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1210-1082</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2210-6650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1070-8227</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1178-1653
ispartof The patient : patient-centered outcomes research, 2025-01, Vol.18 (1), p.19
issn 1178-1653
1178-1661
1178-1661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3076286385
source Springer Nature; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Choice Behavior
Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Preference
title Discrete Choice Experiments to Elicit Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T22%3A51%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discrete%20Choice%20Experiments%20to%20Elicit%20Patient%20Preferences%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Major%20Depressive%20Disorder:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=The%20patient%20:%20patient-centered%20outcomes%20research&rft.au=dosReis,%20Susan&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.pages=19-&rft.issn=1178-1653&rft.eissn=1178-1661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40271-024-00706-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3076286385%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-fc8e155e7d267c55a6e6df160fdd7e4a8dfb666361a1b5a94563bf226c3aa4fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3076286385&rft_id=info:pmid/38969878&rfr_iscdi=true