Loading…
High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy
Background Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity....
Saved in:
Published in: | Asian journal of endoscopic surgery 2024-07, Vol.17 (3), p.e13353-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2463-afb38cb1203dccc2ae5fadc210a73ca3787001ebe0127a0ee9821fd845ca72843 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e13353 |
container_title | Asian journal of endoscopic surgery |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Yamamoto, Tetsu Hyakudomi, Ryoji Takai, Kiyoe Uchida, Yuki Ishitobi, Kazunari Hirahara, Noriyuki Tajima, Yoshitsugu |
description | Background
Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity. We have introduced a high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA) in TAPP for inguinal hernia patients in whom peritoneal dissection is difficult due to severe adhesions after RP. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAPP with a HPIA for patients with an inguinal hernia after robot‐assisted RP (RARP).
Methods
Patients characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated by a retrospective analysis.
Results
From January 2014 to December 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent TAPP for an inguinal hernia after RARP. Twenty‐four lesions were the type 3b and three were type 3a according to the Nyhus classification. A circular incision TAPP was performed for 10 hernia lesions in eight patients and TAPP with HPIA was utilized for 17 lesions in 13 patients. The mean operation time for the unilateral hernia in the HPIA (137.8 ± 20.7 min) was significantly shorter than that (182.2 ± 42.0 min) in the circular incision TAPP (p = .038). The HPIA was complete in all patients, while the circular incision TAPP was converted to intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)intraperitoneal onlay mesh in five patients (55.6%, p = .008) due to dense adhesions with difficult dissection. No recurrent was observed after follow‐up period of 48 months in both groups.
Conclusions
The TAPP with HPIA is feasible and a safe and reliable treatment of choice in patients with an inguinal hernia after RARP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ases.13353 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079171228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3079171228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2463-afb38cb1203dccc2ae5fadc210a73ca3787001ebe0127a0ee9821fd845ca72843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9KJDEQh4Mo6qoXH2AJeHEXRvOn26SPg-i6ICjMeG6q09UzGbo7vUmaZd5iH9nMjCviwVwqFF99RfEj5JyzK57eNQQMV1zKXO6RY65yPckLzvbf_0wckW8hrBi7UTyTh-RI6qLgeS6Oyb8Hu1jSAb2Nrkdoqe2NDdb1FIbBOzDL1KHY1y4YN1hDo4c-QFW7zvYJHzx-GB4gpoGhhRDX9HI-fX7-QRvnk2IxbvEl-t4ChSaipx5qa7YOFyJENNF161Ny0EAb8OytnpCX-7v57cPk8enX79vp48SI7EZOoKmkNhUXTNbGGAGYN1AbwRkoaUAqrRjjWCHjQgFDLLTgTa2z3IASOpMn5HLnTdv_jBhi2dlgsG2hRzeGUjJVcMWF0Am9-ISu3OjTORtKM60ymatE_dxRJp0TPDbl4G0Hfl1yVm5yKjc5lducEvz9TTlWHdbv6P9gEsB3wF_b4voLVTmd3c120lcgOKB8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3080874357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Yamamoto, Tetsu ; Hyakudomi, Ryoji ; Takai, Kiyoe ; Uchida, Yuki ; Ishitobi, Kazunari ; Hirahara, Noriyuki ; Tajima, Yoshitsugu</creator><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Tetsu ; Hyakudomi, Ryoji ; Takai, Kiyoe ; Uchida, Yuki ; Ishitobi, Kazunari ; Hirahara, Noriyuki ; Tajima, Yoshitsugu</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity. We have introduced a high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA) in TAPP for inguinal hernia patients in whom peritoneal dissection is difficult due to severe adhesions after RP. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAPP with a HPIA for patients with an inguinal hernia after robot‐assisted RP (RARP).
Methods
Patients characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated by a retrospective analysis.
Results
From January 2014 to December 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent TAPP for an inguinal hernia after RARP. Twenty‐four lesions were the type 3b and three were type 3a according to the Nyhus classification. A circular incision TAPP was performed for 10 hernia lesions in eight patients and TAPP with HPIA was utilized for 17 lesions in 13 patients. The mean operation time for the unilateral hernia in the HPIA (137.8 ± 20.7 min) was significantly shorter than that (182.2 ± 42.0 min) in the circular incision TAPP (p = .038). The HPIA was complete in all patients, while the circular incision TAPP was converted to intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)intraperitoneal onlay mesh in five patients (55.6%, p = .008) due to dense adhesions with difficult dissection. No recurrent was observed after follow‐up period of 48 months in both groups.
Conclusions
The TAPP with HPIA is feasible and a safe and reliable treatment of choice in patients with an inguinal hernia after RARP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5902</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ases.13353</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38991552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Endoscopy - methods ; Hernia, Inguinal - surgery ; Hernias ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Humans ; laparoscopic herniorrhaphy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Peritoneum ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prostatectomy - methods ; radical prostatectomy ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Surgical Mesh ; TAPP ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2024-07, Vol.17 (3), p.e13353-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2463-afb38cb1203dccc2ae5fadc210a73ca3787001ebe0127a0ee9821fd845ca72843</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8624-1395</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38991552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Tetsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyakudomi, Ryoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takai, Kiyoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchida, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishitobi, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirahara, Noriyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajima, Yoshitsugu</creatorcontrib><title>High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy</title><title>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</title><addtitle>Asian J Endosc Surg</addtitle><description>Background
Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity. We have introduced a high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA) in TAPP for inguinal hernia patients in whom peritoneal dissection is difficult due to severe adhesions after RP. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAPP with a HPIA for patients with an inguinal hernia after robot‐assisted RP (RARP).
Methods
Patients characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated by a retrospective analysis.
Results
From January 2014 to December 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent TAPP for an inguinal hernia after RARP. Twenty‐four lesions were the type 3b and three were type 3a according to the Nyhus classification. A circular incision TAPP was performed for 10 hernia lesions in eight patients and TAPP with HPIA was utilized for 17 lesions in 13 patients. The mean operation time for the unilateral hernia in the HPIA (137.8 ± 20.7 min) was significantly shorter than that (182.2 ± 42.0 min) in the circular incision TAPP (p = .038). The HPIA was complete in all patients, while the circular incision TAPP was converted to intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)intraperitoneal onlay mesh in five patients (55.6%, p = .008) due to dense adhesions with difficult dissection. No recurrent was observed after follow‐up period of 48 months in both groups.
Conclusions
The TAPP with HPIA is feasible and a safe and reliable treatment of choice in patients with an inguinal hernia after RARP.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Endoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>laparoscopic herniorrhaphy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Peritoneum</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>radical prostatectomy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>TAPP</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1758-5902</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9KJDEQh4Mo6qoXH2AJeHEXRvOn26SPg-i6ICjMeG6q09UzGbo7vUmaZd5iH9nMjCviwVwqFF99RfEj5JyzK57eNQQMV1zKXO6RY65yPckLzvbf_0wckW8hrBi7UTyTh-RI6qLgeS6Oyb8Hu1jSAb2Nrkdoqe2NDdb1FIbBOzDL1KHY1y4YN1hDo4c-QFW7zvYJHzx-GB4gpoGhhRDX9HI-fX7-QRvnk2IxbvEl-t4ChSaipx5qa7YOFyJENNF161Ny0EAb8OytnpCX-7v57cPk8enX79vp48SI7EZOoKmkNhUXTNbGGAGYN1AbwRkoaUAqrRjjWCHjQgFDLLTgTa2z3IASOpMn5HLnTdv_jBhi2dlgsG2hRzeGUjJVcMWF0Am9-ISu3OjTORtKM60ymatE_dxRJp0TPDbl4G0Hfl1yVm5yKjc5lducEvz9TTlWHdbv6P9gEsB3wF_b4voLVTmd3c120lcgOKB8</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Yamamoto, Tetsu</creator><creator>Hyakudomi, Ryoji</creator><creator>Takai, Kiyoe</creator><creator>Uchida, Yuki</creator><creator>Ishitobi, Kazunari</creator><creator>Hirahara, Noriyuki</creator><creator>Tajima, Yoshitsugu</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8624-1395</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy</title><author>Yamamoto, Tetsu ; Hyakudomi, Ryoji ; Takai, Kiyoe ; Uchida, Yuki ; Ishitobi, Kazunari ; Hirahara, Noriyuki ; Tajima, Yoshitsugu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2463-afb38cb1203dccc2ae5fadc210a73ca3787001ebe0127a0ee9821fd845ca72843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Endoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>laparoscopic herniorrhaphy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Peritoneum</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>radical prostatectomy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>TAPP</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Tetsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyakudomi, Ryoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takai, Kiyoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchida, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishitobi, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirahara, Noriyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajima, Yoshitsugu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamamoto, Tetsu</au><au>Hyakudomi, Ryoji</au><au>Takai, Kiyoe</au><au>Uchida, Yuki</au><au>Ishitobi, Kazunari</au><au>Hirahara, Noriyuki</au><au>Tajima, Yoshitsugu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy</atitle><jtitle>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Asian J Endosc Surg</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e13353</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13353-n/a</pages><issn>1758-5902</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><eissn>1758-5910</eissn><abstract>Background
Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity. We have introduced a high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA) in TAPP for inguinal hernia patients in whom peritoneal dissection is difficult due to severe adhesions after RP. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAPP with a HPIA for patients with an inguinal hernia after robot‐assisted RP (RARP).
Methods
Patients characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated by a retrospective analysis.
Results
From January 2014 to December 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent TAPP for an inguinal hernia after RARP. Twenty‐four lesions were the type 3b and three were type 3a according to the Nyhus classification. A circular incision TAPP was performed for 10 hernia lesions in eight patients and TAPP with HPIA was utilized for 17 lesions in 13 patients. The mean operation time for the unilateral hernia in the HPIA (137.8 ± 20.7 min) was significantly shorter than that (182.2 ± 42.0 min) in the circular incision TAPP (p = .038). The HPIA was complete in all patients, while the circular incision TAPP was converted to intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)intraperitoneal onlay mesh in five patients (55.6%, p = .008) due to dense adhesions with difficult dissection. No recurrent was observed after follow‐up period of 48 months in both groups.
Conclusions
The TAPP with HPIA is feasible and a safe and reliable treatment of choice in patients with an inguinal hernia after RARP.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>38991552</pmid><doi>10.1111/ases.13353</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8624-1395</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1758-5902 |
ispartof | Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2024-07, Vol.17 (3), p.e13353-n/a |
issn | 1758-5902 1758-5910 1758-5910 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079171228 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Aged Endoscopy - methods Hernia, Inguinal - surgery Hernias Herniorrhaphy - methods Humans laparoscopic herniorrhaphy Laparoscopy - methods Male Middle Aged Operative Time Peritoneum Postoperative Complications - etiology Prostatectomy - methods radical prostatectomy Retrospective Studies Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Surgical Mesh TAPP Treatment Outcome |
title | High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A44%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%20peritoneal%20incision%20approach%20in%20endoscopic%20transabdominal%20preperitoneal%20patch%20plasty%20(TAPP)%20for%20inguinal%20hernia%20after%20radical%20prostatectomy&rft.jtitle=Asian%20journal%20of%20endoscopic%20surgery&rft.au=Yamamoto,%20Tetsu&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e13353&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13353-n/a&rft.issn=1758-5902&rft.eissn=1758-5910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ases.13353&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3079171228%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2463-afb38cb1203dccc2ae5fadc210a73ca3787001ebe0127a0ee9821fd845ca72843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3080874357&rft_id=info:pmid/38991552&rfr_iscdi=true |