Loading…

High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy

Background Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Asian journal of endoscopic surgery 2024-07, Vol.17 (3), p.e13353-n/a
Main Authors: Yamamoto, Tetsu, Hyakudomi, Ryoji, Takai, Kiyoe, Uchida, Yuki, Ishitobi, Kazunari, Hirahara, Noriyuki, Tajima, Yoshitsugu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2463-afb38cb1203dccc2ae5fadc210a73ca3787001ebe0127a0ee9821fd845ca72843
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 3
container_start_page e13353
container_title Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
container_volume 17
creator Yamamoto, Tetsu
Hyakudomi, Ryoji
Takai, Kiyoe
Uchida, Yuki
Ishitobi, Kazunari
Hirahara, Noriyuki
Tajima, Yoshitsugu
description Background Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity. We have introduced a high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA) in TAPP for inguinal hernia patients in whom peritoneal dissection is difficult due to severe adhesions after RP. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAPP with a HPIA for patients with an inguinal hernia after robot‐assisted RP (RARP). Methods Patients characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated by a retrospective analysis. Results From January 2014 to December 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent TAPP for an inguinal hernia after RARP. Twenty‐four lesions were the type 3b and three were type 3a according to the Nyhus classification. A circular incision TAPP was performed for 10 hernia lesions in eight patients and TAPP with HPIA was utilized for 17 lesions in 13 patients. The mean operation time for the unilateral hernia in the HPIA (137.8 ± 20.7 min) was significantly shorter than that (182.2 ± 42.0 min) in the circular incision TAPP (p = .038). The HPIA was complete in all patients, while the circular incision TAPP was converted to intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)intraperitoneal onlay mesh in five patients (55.6%, p = .008) due to dense adhesions with difficult dissection. No recurrent was observed after follow‐up period of 48 months in both groups. Conclusions The TAPP with HPIA is feasible and a safe and reliable treatment of choice in patients with an inguinal hernia after RARP.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ases.13353
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079171228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3079171228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2463-afb38cb1203dccc2ae5fadc210a73ca3787001ebe0127a0ee9821fd845ca72843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9KJDEQh4Mo6qoXH2AJeHEXRvOn26SPg-i6ICjMeG6q09UzGbo7vUmaZd5iH9nMjCviwVwqFF99RfEj5JyzK57eNQQMV1zKXO6RY65yPckLzvbf_0wckW8hrBi7UTyTh-RI6qLgeS6Oyb8Hu1jSAb2Nrkdoqe2NDdb1FIbBOzDL1KHY1y4YN1hDo4c-QFW7zvYJHzx-GB4gpoGhhRDX9HI-fX7-QRvnk2IxbvEl-t4ChSaipx5qa7YOFyJENNF161Ny0EAb8OytnpCX-7v57cPk8enX79vp48SI7EZOoKmkNhUXTNbGGAGYN1AbwRkoaUAqrRjjWCHjQgFDLLTgTa2z3IASOpMn5HLnTdv_jBhi2dlgsG2hRzeGUjJVcMWF0Am9-ISu3OjTORtKM60ymatE_dxRJp0TPDbl4G0Hfl1yVm5yKjc5lducEvz9TTlWHdbv6P9gEsB3wF_b4voLVTmd3c120lcgOKB8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3080874357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Yamamoto, Tetsu ; Hyakudomi, Ryoji ; Takai, Kiyoe ; Uchida, Yuki ; Ishitobi, Kazunari ; Hirahara, Noriyuki ; Tajima, Yoshitsugu</creator><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Tetsu ; Hyakudomi, Ryoji ; Takai, Kiyoe ; Uchida, Yuki ; Ishitobi, Kazunari ; Hirahara, Noriyuki ; Tajima, Yoshitsugu</creatorcontrib><description>Background Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity. We have introduced a high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA) in TAPP for inguinal hernia patients in whom peritoneal dissection is difficult due to severe adhesions after RP. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAPP with a HPIA for patients with an inguinal hernia after robot‐assisted RP (RARP). Methods Patients characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated by a retrospective analysis. Results From January 2014 to December 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent TAPP for an inguinal hernia after RARP. Twenty‐four lesions were the type 3b and three were type 3a according to the Nyhus classification. A circular incision TAPP was performed for 10 hernia lesions in eight patients and TAPP with HPIA was utilized for 17 lesions in 13 patients. The mean operation time for the unilateral hernia in the HPIA (137.8 ± 20.7 min) was significantly shorter than that (182.2 ± 42.0 min) in the circular incision TAPP (p = .038). The HPIA was complete in all patients, while the circular incision TAPP was converted to intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)intraperitoneal onlay mesh in five patients (55.6%, p = .008) due to dense adhesions with difficult dissection. No recurrent was observed after follow‐up period of 48 months in both groups. Conclusions The TAPP with HPIA is feasible and a safe and reliable treatment of choice in patients with an inguinal hernia after RARP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5902</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ases.13353</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38991552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Endoscopy - methods ; Hernia, Inguinal - surgery ; Hernias ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Humans ; laparoscopic herniorrhaphy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Peritoneum ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prostatectomy - methods ; radical prostatectomy ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Surgical Mesh ; TAPP ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2024-07, Vol.17 (3), p.e13353-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2463-afb38cb1203dccc2ae5fadc210a73ca3787001ebe0127a0ee9821fd845ca72843</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8624-1395</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38991552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Tetsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyakudomi, Ryoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takai, Kiyoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchida, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishitobi, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirahara, Noriyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajima, Yoshitsugu</creatorcontrib><title>High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy</title><title>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</title><addtitle>Asian J Endosc Surg</addtitle><description>Background Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity. We have introduced a high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA) in TAPP for inguinal hernia patients in whom peritoneal dissection is difficult due to severe adhesions after RP. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAPP with a HPIA for patients with an inguinal hernia after robot‐assisted RP (RARP). Methods Patients characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated by a retrospective analysis. Results From January 2014 to December 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent TAPP for an inguinal hernia after RARP. Twenty‐four lesions were the type 3b and three were type 3a according to the Nyhus classification. A circular incision TAPP was performed for 10 hernia lesions in eight patients and TAPP with HPIA was utilized for 17 lesions in 13 patients. The mean operation time for the unilateral hernia in the HPIA (137.8 ± 20.7 min) was significantly shorter than that (182.2 ± 42.0 min) in the circular incision TAPP (p = .038). The HPIA was complete in all patients, while the circular incision TAPP was converted to intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)intraperitoneal onlay mesh in five patients (55.6%, p = .008) due to dense adhesions with difficult dissection. No recurrent was observed after follow‐up period of 48 months in both groups. Conclusions The TAPP with HPIA is feasible and a safe and reliable treatment of choice in patients with an inguinal hernia after RARP.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Endoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>laparoscopic herniorrhaphy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Peritoneum</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>radical prostatectomy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>TAPP</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1758-5902</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9KJDEQh4Mo6qoXH2AJeHEXRvOn26SPg-i6ICjMeG6q09UzGbo7vUmaZd5iH9nMjCviwVwqFF99RfEj5JyzK57eNQQMV1zKXO6RY65yPckLzvbf_0wckW8hrBi7UTyTh-RI6qLgeS6Oyb8Hu1jSAb2Nrkdoqe2NDdb1FIbBOzDL1KHY1y4YN1hDo4c-QFW7zvYJHzx-GB4gpoGhhRDX9HI-fX7-QRvnk2IxbvEl-t4ChSaipx5qa7YOFyJENNF161Ny0EAb8OytnpCX-7v57cPk8enX79vp48SI7EZOoKmkNhUXTNbGGAGYN1AbwRkoaUAqrRjjWCHjQgFDLLTgTa2z3IASOpMn5HLnTdv_jBhi2dlgsG2hRzeGUjJVcMWF0Am9-ISu3OjTORtKM60ymatE_dxRJp0TPDbl4G0Hfl1yVm5yKjc5lducEvz9TTlWHdbv6P9gEsB3wF_b4voLVTmd3c120lcgOKB8</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Yamamoto, Tetsu</creator><creator>Hyakudomi, Ryoji</creator><creator>Takai, Kiyoe</creator><creator>Uchida, Yuki</creator><creator>Ishitobi, Kazunari</creator><creator>Hirahara, Noriyuki</creator><creator>Tajima, Yoshitsugu</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8624-1395</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy</title><author>Yamamoto, Tetsu ; Hyakudomi, Ryoji ; Takai, Kiyoe ; Uchida, Yuki ; Ishitobi, Kazunari ; Hirahara, Noriyuki ; Tajima, Yoshitsugu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2463-afb38cb1203dccc2ae5fadc210a73ca3787001ebe0127a0ee9821fd845ca72843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Endoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>laparoscopic herniorrhaphy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Peritoneum</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>radical prostatectomy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>TAPP</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Tetsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyakudomi, Ryoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takai, Kiyoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchida, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishitobi, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirahara, Noriyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajima, Yoshitsugu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamamoto, Tetsu</au><au>Hyakudomi, Ryoji</au><au>Takai, Kiyoe</au><au>Uchida, Yuki</au><au>Ishitobi, Kazunari</au><au>Hirahara, Noriyuki</au><au>Tajima, Yoshitsugu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy</atitle><jtitle>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Asian J Endosc Surg</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e13353</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13353-n/a</pages><issn>1758-5902</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><eissn>1758-5910</eissn><abstract>Background Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity. We have introduced a high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA) in TAPP for inguinal hernia patients in whom peritoneal dissection is difficult due to severe adhesions after RP. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAPP with a HPIA for patients with an inguinal hernia after robot‐assisted RP (RARP). Methods Patients characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated by a retrospective analysis. Results From January 2014 to December 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent TAPP for an inguinal hernia after RARP. Twenty‐four lesions were the type 3b and three were type 3a according to the Nyhus classification. A circular incision TAPP was performed for 10 hernia lesions in eight patients and TAPP with HPIA was utilized for 17 lesions in 13 patients. The mean operation time for the unilateral hernia in the HPIA (137.8 ± 20.7 min) was significantly shorter than that (182.2 ± 42.0 min) in the circular incision TAPP (p = .038). The HPIA was complete in all patients, while the circular incision TAPP was converted to intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)intraperitoneal onlay mesh in five patients (55.6%, p = .008) due to dense adhesions with difficult dissection. No recurrent was observed after follow‐up period of 48 months in both groups. Conclusions The TAPP with HPIA is feasible and a safe and reliable treatment of choice in patients with an inguinal hernia after RARP.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>38991552</pmid><doi>10.1111/ases.13353</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8624-1395</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-5902
ispartof Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2024-07, Vol.17 (3), p.e13353-n/a
issn 1758-5902
1758-5910
1758-5910
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079171228
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Aged
Endoscopy - methods
Hernia, Inguinal - surgery
Hernias
Herniorrhaphy - methods
Humans
laparoscopic herniorrhaphy
Laparoscopy - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Peritoneum
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Prostatectomy - methods
radical prostatectomy
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
Surgical Mesh
TAPP
Treatment Outcome
title High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A44%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%20peritoneal%20incision%20approach%20in%20endoscopic%20transabdominal%20preperitoneal%20patch%20plasty%20(TAPP)%20for%20inguinal%20hernia%20after%20radical%20prostatectomy&rft.jtitle=Asian%20journal%20of%20endoscopic%20surgery&rft.au=Yamamoto,%20Tetsu&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e13353&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13353-n/a&rft.issn=1758-5902&rft.eissn=1758-5910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ases.13353&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3079171228%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2463-afb38cb1203dccc2ae5fadc210a73ca3787001ebe0127a0ee9821fd845ca72843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3080874357&rft_id=info:pmid/38991552&rfr_iscdi=true