Loading…

Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy

Since the optimal scheme for targeted biopsies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suspicious lesions remains unclear, we compare the efficacy of two schemes for these index lesions. A prospective trial was conducted in 1161 men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v 2.1 3-5 undergoing ta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancers 2024-06, Vol.16 (13), p.2306
Main Authors: Morote, Juan, Paesano, Nahuel, Picola, Natàlia, Miró, Berta, Abascal, José M, Servian, Pol, Trilla, Enrique, Méndez, Olga
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-58c59fcb8881af54c8b5cf34130ee058ff4a7e118d5604f194459dd0fb480cce3
container_end_page
container_issue 13
container_start_page 2306
container_title Cancers
container_volume 16
creator Morote, Juan
Paesano, Nahuel
Picola, Natàlia
Miró, Berta
Abascal, José M
Servian, Pol
Trilla, Enrique
Méndez, Olga
description Since the optimal scheme for targeted biopsies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suspicious lesions remains unclear, we compare the efficacy of two schemes for these index lesions. A prospective trial was conducted in 1161 men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v 2.1 3-5 undergoing targeted and 12-core systematic biopsy in four centers between 2021 and 2023. Two- to four-core MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsies via the transperineal route were conducted in 900 men in three centers, while a mapping per 0.5 mm core method (saturated scheme) was employed in 261 men biopsied in another center. A propensity-matched 261 paired cases were selected for avoiding confounders other than the targeted biopsy scheme. CsPCa (grade group ≥ 2) was identified in 125 index lesions (41.1%) when the two- to four-core scheme was employed, while in 187 (71.9%) when the saturated biopsy ( < 0.001) was used. Insignificant PCa (iPCa) was detected in 18 and 11.1%, respectively ( = 0.019). Rates of csPCa and iPCa remained similar in systematic biopsies. CsPCa detected only in systematic biopsies were 5 and 1.5%, respectively ( = 0.035) in each group. The saturated scheme for targeted biopsies detected more csPCa and less iPCa than did the two- to four-core scheme in the index lesions. The rate of csPCa detected only in the systematic biopsies decreased when the saturated scheme was employed.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/cancers16132306
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079860374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3079860374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-58c59fcb8881af54c8b5cf34130ee058ff4a7e118d5604f194459dd0fb480cce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v3CAQhlHUqomSnHuLkHLpxQ0s2IbeUqdpIm3UqtmeLRYPWyIbHMBJ8-_604LzpWq5DAzPDO_wIvSRks-MSXKildMQIq0oWzBS7aC9BakXRVVJ_u6__S46jPGG5MUYrav6A9rN1YSySu6hf40fRhWs2-DVvccrFTaQoMNfrR_jA77Wf2CAiI0P-Cxf6DSTTW-d1arvM2A3zpp8cAn_DD4mlQA3T8KwdfhKbRwkq_EviN7NaXzpOviLlxCtd_HL_GqBk8fnfgpF4wPguzzTFPG1SlNQs5ZVUC6OkEWC6rclHqD3RvURDl_iPvp9_m3VXBTLH98vm9NloRclSUUpdCmNXgshqDIl12JdasM4ZQSAlMIYrmqgVHRlRbihkvNSdh0xay6I1sD20afnvmPwtxPE1A42auh75cBPsWWklqIirOYZPd5Cb_JwLqubKSElkbzO1MkzpfO3xQCmHYMdVHhoKWlnf9stf3PF0UvfaT1A98a_uskeAWc9pSo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3078990947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Morote, Juan ; Paesano, Nahuel ; Picola, Natàlia ; Miró, Berta ; Abascal, José M ; Servian, Pol ; Trilla, Enrique ; Méndez, Olga</creator><creatorcontrib>Morote, Juan ; Paesano, Nahuel ; Picola, Natàlia ; Miró, Berta ; Abascal, José M ; Servian, Pol ; Trilla, Enrique ; Méndez, Olga</creatorcontrib><description>Since the optimal scheme for targeted biopsies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suspicious lesions remains unclear, we compare the efficacy of two schemes for these index lesions. A prospective trial was conducted in 1161 men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v 2.1 3-5 undergoing targeted and 12-core systematic biopsy in four centers between 2021 and 2023. Two- to four-core MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsies via the transperineal route were conducted in 900 men in three centers, while a mapping per 0.5 mm core method (saturated scheme) was employed in 261 men biopsied in another center. A propensity-matched 261 paired cases were selected for avoiding confounders other than the targeted biopsy scheme. CsPCa (grade group ≥ 2) was identified in 125 index lesions (41.1%) when the two- to four-core scheme was employed, while in 187 (71.9%) when the saturated biopsy ( &lt; 0.001) was used. Insignificant PCa (iPCa) was detected in 18 and 11.1%, respectively ( = 0.019). Rates of csPCa and iPCa remained similar in systematic biopsies. CsPCa detected only in systematic biopsies were 5 and 1.5%, respectively ( = 0.035) in each group. The saturated scheme for targeted biopsies detected more csPCa and less iPCa than did the two- to four-core scheme in the index lesions. The rate of csPCa detected only in the systematic biopsies decreased when the saturated scheme was employed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132306</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39001369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Clinical significance ; Lesions ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Mapping ; Prostate cancer ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2024-06, Vol.16 (13), p.2306</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-58c59fcb8881af54c8b5cf34130ee058ff4a7e118d5604f194459dd0fb480cce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2168-323X ; 0000-0001-9278-5543</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3078990947/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3078990947?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39001369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morote, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paesano, Nahuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picola, Natàlia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miró, Berta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abascal, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Servian, Pol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trilla, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez, Olga</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>Since the optimal scheme for targeted biopsies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suspicious lesions remains unclear, we compare the efficacy of two schemes for these index lesions. A prospective trial was conducted in 1161 men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v 2.1 3-5 undergoing targeted and 12-core systematic biopsy in four centers between 2021 and 2023. Two- to four-core MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsies via the transperineal route were conducted in 900 men in three centers, while a mapping per 0.5 mm core method (saturated scheme) was employed in 261 men biopsied in another center. A propensity-matched 261 paired cases were selected for avoiding confounders other than the targeted biopsy scheme. CsPCa (grade group ≥ 2) was identified in 125 index lesions (41.1%) when the two- to four-core scheme was employed, while in 187 (71.9%) when the saturated biopsy ( &lt; 0.001) was used. Insignificant PCa (iPCa) was detected in 18 and 11.1%, respectively ( = 0.019). Rates of csPCa and iPCa remained similar in systematic biopsies. CsPCa detected only in systematic biopsies were 5 and 1.5%, respectively ( = 0.035) in each group. The saturated scheme for targeted biopsies detected more csPCa and less iPCa than did the two- to four-core scheme in the index lesions. The rate of csPCa detected only in the systematic biopsies decreased when the saturated scheme was employed.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1v3CAQhlHUqomSnHuLkHLpxQ0s2IbeUqdpIm3UqtmeLRYPWyIbHMBJ8-_604LzpWq5DAzPDO_wIvSRks-MSXKildMQIq0oWzBS7aC9BakXRVVJ_u6__S46jPGG5MUYrav6A9rN1YSySu6hf40fRhWs2-DVvccrFTaQoMNfrR_jA77Wf2CAiI0P-Cxf6DSTTW-d1arvM2A3zpp8cAn_DD4mlQA3T8KwdfhKbRwkq_EviN7NaXzpOviLlxCtd_HL_GqBk8fnfgpF4wPguzzTFPG1SlNQs5ZVUC6OkEWC6rclHqD3RvURDl_iPvp9_m3VXBTLH98vm9NloRclSUUpdCmNXgshqDIl12JdasM4ZQSAlMIYrmqgVHRlRbihkvNSdh0xay6I1sD20afnvmPwtxPE1A42auh75cBPsWWklqIirOYZPd5Cb_JwLqubKSElkbzO1MkzpfO3xQCmHYMdVHhoKWlnf9stf3PF0UvfaT1A98a_uskeAWc9pSo</recordid><startdate>20240623</startdate><enddate>20240623</enddate><creator>Morote, Juan</creator><creator>Paesano, Nahuel</creator><creator>Picola, Natàlia</creator><creator>Miró, Berta</creator><creator>Abascal, José M</creator><creator>Servian, Pol</creator><creator>Trilla, Enrique</creator><creator>Méndez, Olga</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2168-323X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-5543</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240623</creationdate><title>Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy</title><author>Morote, Juan ; Paesano, Nahuel ; Picola, Natàlia ; Miró, Berta ; Abascal, José M ; Servian, Pol ; Trilla, Enrique ; Méndez, Olga</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-58c59fcb8881af54c8b5cf34130ee058ff4a7e118d5604f194459dd0fb480cce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morote, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paesano, Nahuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picola, Natàlia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miró, Berta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abascal, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Servian, Pol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trilla, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez, Olga</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morote, Juan</au><au>Paesano, Nahuel</au><au>Picola, Natàlia</au><au>Miró, Berta</au><au>Abascal, José M</au><au>Servian, Pol</au><au>Trilla, Enrique</au><au>Méndez, Olga</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2024-06-23</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2306</spage><pages>2306-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>Since the optimal scheme for targeted biopsies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suspicious lesions remains unclear, we compare the efficacy of two schemes for these index lesions. A prospective trial was conducted in 1161 men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v 2.1 3-5 undergoing targeted and 12-core systematic biopsy in four centers between 2021 and 2023. Two- to four-core MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsies via the transperineal route were conducted in 900 men in three centers, while a mapping per 0.5 mm core method (saturated scheme) was employed in 261 men biopsied in another center. A propensity-matched 261 paired cases were selected for avoiding confounders other than the targeted biopsy scheme. CsPCa (grade group ≥ 2) was identified in 125 index lesions (41.1%) when the two- to four-core scheme was employed, while in 187 (71.9%) when the saturated biopsy ( &lt; 0.001) was used. Insignificant PCa (iPCa) was detected in 18 and 11.1%, respectively ( = 0.019). Rates of csPCa and iPCa remained similar in systematic biopsies. CsPCa detected only in systematic biopsies were 5 and 1.5%, respectively ( = 0.035) in each group. The saturated scheme for targeted biopsies detected more csPCa and less iPCa than did the two- to four-core scheme in the index lesions. The rate of csPCa detected only in the systematic biopsies decreased when the saturated scheme was employed.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39001369</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers16132306</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2168-323X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-5543</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6694
ispartof Cancers, 2024-06, Vol.16 (13), p.2306
issn 2072-6694
2072-6694
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079860374
source PMC (PubMed Central); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Biopsy
Clinical significance
Lesions
Magnetic resonance imaging
Mapping
Prostate cancer
Statistical analysis
title Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A30%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Two%20Targeted%20Biopsy%20Schemes%20for%20Detecting%20Clinically%20Significant%20Prostate%20Cancer%20in%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Index%20Lesions:%20Two-%20to%20Four-Core%20versus%20Saturated%20Transperineal%20Targeted%20Biopsy&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Morote,%20Juan&rft.date=2024-06-23&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2306&rft.pages=2306-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers16132306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3079860374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-58c59fcb8881af54c8b5cf34130ee058ff4a7e118d5604f194459dd0fb480cce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3078990947&rft_id=info:pmid/39001369&rfr_iscdi=true