Loading…
Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy
Since the optimal scheme for targeted biopsies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suspicious lesions remains unclear, we compare the efficacy of two schemes for these index lesions. A prospective trial was conducted in 1161 men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v 2.1 3-5 undergoing ta...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancers 2024-06, Vol.16 (13), p.2306 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-58c59fcb8881af54c8b5cf34130ee058ff4a7e118d5604f194459dd0fb480cce3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 2306 |
container_title | Cancers |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Morote, Juan Paesano, Nahuel Picola, Natàlia Miró, Berta Abascal, José M Servian, Pol Trilla, Enrique Méndez, Olga |
description | Since the optimal scheme for targeted biopsies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suspicious lesions remains unclear, we compare the efficacy of two schemes for these index lesions. A prospective trial was conducted in 1161 men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v 2.1 3-5 undergoing targeted and 12-core systematic biopsy in four centers between 2021 and 2023. Two- to four-core MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsies via the transperineal route were conducted in 900 men in three centers, while a mapping per 0.5 mm core method (saturated scheme) was employed in 261 men biopsied in another center. A propensity-matched 261 paired cases were selected for avoiding confounders other than the targeted biopsy scheme. CsPCa (grade group ≥ 2) was identified in 125 index lesions (41.1%) when the two- to four-core scheme was employed, while in 187 (71.9%) when the saturated biopsy (
< 0.001) was used. Insignificant PCa (iPCa) was detected in 18 and 11.1%, respectively (
= 0.019). Rates of csPCa and iPCa remained similar in systematic biopsies. CsPCa detected only in systematic biopsies were 5 and 1.5%, respectively (
= 0.035) in each group. The saturated scheme for targeted biopsies detected more csPCa and less iPCa than did the two- to four-core scheme in the index lesions. The rate of csPCa detected only in the systematic biopsies decreased when the saturated scheme was employed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/cancers16132306 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079860374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3079860374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-58c59fcb8881af54c8b5cf34130ee058ff4a7e118d5604f194459dd0fb480cce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v3CAQhlHUqomSnHuLkHLpxQ0s2IbeUqdpIm3UqtmeLRYPWyIbHMBJ8-_604LzpWq5DAzPDO_wIvSRks-MSXKildMQIq0oWzBS7aC9BakXRVVJ_u6__S46jPGG5MUYrav6A9rN1YSySu6hf40fRhWs2-DVvccrFTaQoMNfrR_jA77Wf2CAiI0P-Cxf6DSTTW-d1arvM2A3zpp8cAn_DD4mlQA3T8KwdfhKbRwkq_EviN7NaXzpOviLlxCtd_HL_GqBk8fnfgpF4wPguzzTFPG1SlNQs5ZVUC6OkEWC6rclHqD3RvURDl_iPvp9_m3VXBTLH98vm9NloRclSUUpdCmNXgshqDIl12JdasM4ZQSAlMIYrmqgVHRlRbihkvNSdh0xay6I1sD20afnvmPwtxPE1A42auh75cBPsWWklqIirOYZPd5Cb_JwLqubKSElkbzO1MkzpfO3xQCmHYMdVHhoKWlnf9stf3PF0UvfaT1A98a_uskeAWc9pSo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3078990947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Morote, Juan ; Paesano, Nahuel ; Picola, Natàlia ; Miró, Berta ; Abascal, José M ; Servian, Pol ; Trilla, Enrique ; Méndez, Olga</creator><creatorcontrib>Morote, Juan ; Paesano, Nahuel ; Picola, Natàlia ; Miró, Berta ; Abascal, José M ; Servian, Pol ; Trilla, Enrique ; Méndez, Olga</creatorcontrib><description>Since the optimal scheme for targeted biopsies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suspicious lesions remains unclear, we compare the efficacy of two schemes for these index lesions. A prospective trial was conducted in 1161 men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v 2.1 3-5 undergoing targeted and 12-core systematic biopsy in four centers between 2021 and 2023. Two- to four-core MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsies via the transperineal route were conducted in 900 men in three centers, while a mapping per 0.5 mm core method (saturated scheme) was employed in 261 men biopsied in another center. A propensity-matched 261 paired cases were selected for avoiding confounders other than the targeted biopsy scheme. CsPCa (grade group ≥ 2) was identified in 125 index lesions (41.1%) when the two- to four-core scheme was employed, while in 187 (71.9%) when the saturated biopsy (
< 0.001) was used. Insignificant PCa (iPCa) was detected in 18 and 11.1%, respectively (
= 0.019). Rates of csPCa and iPCa remained similar in systematic biopsies. CsPCa detected only in systematic biopsies were 5 and 1.5%, respectively (
= 0.035) in each group. The saturated scheme for targeted biopsies detected more csPCa and less iPCa than did the two- to four-core scheme in the index lesions. The rate of csPCa detected only in the systematic biopsies decreased when the saturated scheme was employed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132306</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39001369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Clinical significance ; Lesions ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Mapping ; Prostate cancer ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2024-06, Vol.16 (13), p.2306</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-58c59fcb8881af54c8b5cf34130ee058ff4a7e118d5604f194459dd0fb480cce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2168-323X ; 0000-0001-9278-5543</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3078990947/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3078990947?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39001369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morote, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paesano, Nahuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picola, Natàlia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miró, Berta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abascal, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Servian, Pol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trilla, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez, Olga</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>Since the optimal scheme for targeted biopsies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suspicious lesions remains unclear, we compare the efficacy of two schemes for these index lesions. A prospective trial was conducted in 1161 men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v 2.1 3-5 undergoing targeted and 12-core systematic biopsy in four centers between 2021 and 2023. Two- to four-core MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsies via the transperineal route were conducted in 900 men in three centers, while a mapping per 0.5 mm core method (saturated scheme) was employed in 261 men biopsied in another center. A propensity-matched 261 paired cases were selected for avoiding confounders other than the targeted biopsy scheme. CsPCa (grade group ≥ 2) was identified in 125 index lesions (41.1%) when the two- to four-core scheme was employed, while in 187 (71.9%) when the saturated biopsy (
< 0.001) was used. Insignificant PCa (iPCa) was detected in 18 and 11.1%, respectively (
= 0.019). Rates of csPCa and iPCa remained similar in systematic biopsies. CsPCa detected only in systematic biopsies were 5 and 1.5%, respectively (
= 0.035) in each group. The saturated scheme for targeted biopsies detected more csPCa and less iPCa than did the two- to four-core scheme in the index lesions. The rate of csPCa detected only in the systematic biopsies decreased when the saturated scheme was employed.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1v3CAQhlHUqomSnHuLkHLpxQ0s2IbeUqdpIm3UqtmeLRYPWyIbHMBJ8-_604LzpWq5DAzPDO_wIvSRks-MSXKildMQIq0oWzBS7aC9BakXRVVJ_u6__S46jPGG5MUYrav6A9rN1YSySu6hf40fRhWs2-DVvccrFTaQoMNfrR_jA77Wf2CAiI0P-Cxf6DSTTW-d1arvM2A3zpp8cAn_DD4mlQA3T8KwdfhKbRwkq_EviN7NaXzpOviLlxCtd_HL_GqBk8fnfgpF4wPguzzTFPG1SlNQs5ZVUC6OkEWC6rclHqD3RvURDl_iPvp9_m3VXBTLH98vm9NloRclSUUpdCmNXgshqDIl12JdasM4ZQSAlMIYrmqgVHRlRbihkvNSdh0xay6I1sD20afnvmPwtxPE1A42auh75cBPsWWklqIirOYZPd5Cb_JwLqubKSElkbzO1MkzpfO3xQCmHYMdVHhoKWlnf9stf3PF0UvfaT1A98a_uskeAWc9pSo</recordid><startdate>20240623</startdate><enddate>20240623</enddate><creator>Morote, Juan</creator><creator>Paesano, Nahuel</creator><creator>Picola, Natàlia</creator><creator>Miró, Berta</creator><creator>Abascal, José M</creator><creator>Servian, Pol</creator><creator>Trilla, Enrique</creator><creator>Méndez, Olga</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2168-323X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-5543</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240623</creationdate><title>Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy</title><author>Morote, Juan ; Paesano, Nahuel ; Picola, Natàlia ; Miró, Berta ; Abascal, José M ; Servian, Pol ; Trilla, Enrique ; Méndez, Olga</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-58c59fcb8881af54c8b5cf34130ee058ff4a7e118d5604f194459dd0fb480cce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morote, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paesano, Nahuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picola, Natàlia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miró, Berta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abascal, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Servian, Pol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trilla, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez, Olga</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morote, Juan</au><au>Paesano, Nahuel</au><au>Picola, Natàlia</au><au>Miró, Berta</au><au>Abascal, José M</au><au>Servian, Pol</au><au>Trilla, Enrique</au><au>Méndez, Olga</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2024-06-23</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2306</spage><pages>2306-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>Since the optimal scheme for targeted biopsies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suspicious lesions remains unclear, we compare the efficacy of two schemes for these index lesions. A prospective trial was conducted in 1161 men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v 2.1 3-5 undergoing targeted and 12-core systematic biopsy in four centers between 2021 and 2023. Two- to four-core MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsies via the transperineal route were conducted in 900 men in three centers, while a mapping per 0.5 mm core method (saturated scheme) was employed in 261 men biopsied in another center. A propensity-matched 261 paired cases were selected for avoiding confounders other than the targeted biopsy scheme. CsPCa (grade group ≥ 2) was identified in 125 index lesions (41.1%) when the two- to four-core scheme was employed, while in 187 (71.9%) when the saturated biopsy (
< 0.001) was used. Insignificant PCa (iPCa) was detected in 18 and 11.1%, respectively (
= 0.019). Rates of csPCa and iPCa remained similar in systematic biopsies. CsPCa detected only in systematic biopsies were 5 and 1.5%, respectively (
= 0.035) in each group. The saturated scheme for targeted biopsies detected more csPCa and less iPCa than did the two- to four-core scheme in the index lesions. The rate of csPCa detected only in the systematic biopsies decreased when the saturated scheme was employed.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39001369</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers16132306</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2168-323X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-5543</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-6694 |
ispartof | Cancers, 2024-06, Vol.16 (13), p.2306 |
issn | 2072-6694 2072-6694 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079860374 |
source | PMC (PubMed Central); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Biopsy Clinical significance Lesions Magnetic resonance imaging Mapping Prostate cancer Statistical analysis |
title | Comparing Two Targeted Biopsy Schemes for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Index Lesions: Two- to Four-Core versus Saturated Transperineal Targeted Biopsy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A30%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Two%20Targeted%20Biopsy%20Schemes%20for%20Detecting%20Clinically%20Significant%20Prostate%20Cancer%20in%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Index%20Lesions:%20Two-%20to%20Four-Core%20versus%20Saturated%20Transperineal%20Targeted%20Biopsy&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Morote,%20Juan&rft.date=2024-06-23&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2306&rft.pages=2306-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers16132306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3079860374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-58c59fcb8881af54c8b5cf34130ee058ff4a7e118d5604f194459dd0fb480cce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3078990947&rft_id=info:pmid/39001369&rfr_iscdi=true |