An ethical assessment of powered exoskeletons: Implications from clinical use to industry and military contexts

• Published in: Artificial organs 2024-10, Vol.48 (10), p.1077-1084
• Main Authors: Erden, Yasemin J., Rainey, Stephen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: assistive devices; Autonomy; enhancement technology; Ethical standards; Ethics; Exoskeleton; Exoskeleton Device; Exoskeletons; Health services; Humans; Mechanical systems; Military Personnel; Military technology; Questions; rehabilitation; social issues; Technology assessment; wearable robotics
• ISSN: 0160-564X; 1525-1594; 1525-1594
• DOI: 10.1111/aor.14822

Exoskeletons are technologies that can help to increase or improve mobility, dexterity, and strength. They can be used as assistive devices, to restore lost affordances, or for rehabilitation. While mechanical exoskeletons are passive and rely on the body's power for movement, powered exoskeletons are active mechanical systems that can assist or enhance a user's capacity, including in strength and performance. They also offer scope to augment or enhance beyond simple medical support, with potential in the future for superhuman power and strength. While these technologies present promising clinical opportunities, including for those who want to regain walking capacity, they also bring ethical questions, such as about data privacy and accessibility. In addition, the physical features of the technology can prove mentally, physically, and financially demanding, and may be deployed in contexts where user choice and autonomy is constrained. In this article, we discuss these issues, and raise some pertinent ethical questions, not all of which can be easily answered. We touch upon medical and therapeutic uses, for industrial and workplace settings, and in military contexts specially, given these are contexts where such technology may be required or even imposed. We argue that reasonable optimism for such technologies needs to be tempered by sufficient ethical assessment to identify and address barriers to research, development, and use. As well as managing any impacts and expectations for the health and wellbeing of users, the potential impact on autonomy and the risk of coercion, we have to consider what kind of data may be recorded or used, and the risk that these technologies could exacerbate existing inequalities or harms. Exploring positive potentials in human‐centred wearable robotics while signposting ethical risks.