Loading…

Two-Year Results of XEN Gel Stent Implantation for Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma in Phakic versus Pseudophakic Eyes

: To investigate whether phakia affects the outcome of XEN-45 gel stent implantation in the treatment of pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG). : A retrospective, comparative cohort study of 30 phakic and 55 pseudophakic PXG patients who received the XEN-45 gel stent at a tertiary centre. The primary out...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical medicine 2024-07, Vol.13 (14), p.4066
Main Authors: Nasyrov, Emil, Merle, David A, Gassel, Caroline J, Wenzel, Daniel A, Voykov, Bogomil
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-95c0f386f04c616b28494be7a01229700bfc52d80c2a8f82dfac0fc77967e4483
container_end_page
container_issue 14
container_start_page 4066
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 13
creator Nasyrov, Emil
Merle, David A
Gassel, Caroline J
Wenzel, Daniel A
Voykov, Bogomil
description : To investigate whether phakia affects the outcome of XEN-45 gel stent implantation in the treatment of pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG). : A retrospective, comparative cohort study of 30 phakic and 55 pseudophakic PXG patients who received the XEN-45 gel stent at a tertiary centre. The primary outcome measure was two-year success defined as a ≥20% lowering of intraocular pressure (IOP) and a target IOP of 6-21 mmHg. Success was complete without and qualified irrespective of antiglaucoma medication use. Further glaucoma surgery other than needling was regarded as a failure. The secondary outcome measures included changes in IOP, revision and complication rates. : The complete two-year success rates were 70% and 59% in the phakic and pseudophakic groups, respectively ( = 0.75, log-rank test), and the qualified rates were 80% and 72%, respectively ( = 0.89). The median IOP reduction from baseline was 54% in phakic, and 46% in pseudophakic eyes. While needling rates were similar, the incidence of early incisional bleb revisions was significantly higher in the phakic eyes (13% vs. 0% within 3 months; = 0.0098, chi-square). Increasing after a year, significantly more pseudophakic eyes failed due to secondary glaucoma surgery (16% vs. 0%; = 0.0191). : The XEN-45 gel stent offers equally effective IOP control for both phakic and pseudophakic patients. However, the onset of bleb revisions and the necessity for secondary glaucoma surgery differed significantly between the groups.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm13144066
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3085118457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3084927164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-95c0f386f04c616b28494be7a01229700bfc52d80c2a8f82dfac0fc77967e4483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctLAzEQxoMoVtSTdwl4EWQ1rybZo0itBVHxAXpa0nSCW3c3a7Lr4783pVWKc5lh-M3HzHwIHVByynlOzua2ppwKQaTcQDuMKJURrvnmWj1A-zHOSQqtBaNqGw3SpBSUyB3UPn767AVMwPcQ-6qL2Dv8PLrBY6jwQwdNhyd1W5mmM13pG-x8wHcR-pmHL-erMnU_AI8r01tfG1w2-O7VvJUWf0CIfVyx7bI3-oa4h7acqSLsr_IuerocPV5cZde348nF-XVmmWBdlg8tcVxLR4SVVE6ZFrmYgjKEMpYrQqbODtlME8uMdprNnEkDVqlcKhBC8110vNRtg3_vIXZFXUYLVToFfB8LTvSQUi2GKqFH_9C570OTtltQImeKSpGokyVlg48xgCvaUNYmfBeUFAsvijUvEn240uynNcz-2N_P8x_2toNt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3084927164</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two-Year Results of XEN Gel Stent Implantation for Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma in Phakic versus Pseudophakic Eyes</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Nasyrov, Emil ; Merle, David A ; Gassel, Caroline J ; Wenzel, Daniel A ; Voykov, Bogomil</creator><creatorcontrib>Nasyrov, Emil ; Merle, David A ; Gassel, Caroline J ; Wenzel, Daniel A ; Voykov, Bogomil</creatorcontrib><description>: To investigate whether phakia affects the outcome of XEN-45 gel stent implantation in the treatment of pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG). : A retrospective, comparative cohort study of 30 phakic and 55 pseudophakic PXG patients who received the XEN-45 gel stent at a tertiary centre. The primary outcome measure was two-year success defined as a ≥20% lowering of intraocular pressure (IOP) and a target IOP of 6-21 mmHg. Success was complete without and qualified irrespective of antiglaucoma medication use. Further glaucoma surgery other than needling was regarded as a failure. The secondary outcome measures included changes in IOP, revision and complication rates. : The complete two-year success rates were 70% and 59% in the phakic and pseudophakic groups, respectively ( = 0.75, log-rank test), and the qualified rates were 80% and 72%, respectively ( = 0.89). The median IOP reduction from baseline was 54% in phakic, and 46% in pseudophakic eyes. While needling rates were similar, the incidence of early incisional bleb revisions was significantly higher in the phakic eyes (13% vs. 0% within 3 months; = 0.0098, chi-square). Increasing after a year, significantly more pseudophakic eyes failed due to secondary glaucoma surgery (16% vs. 0%; = 0.0191). : The XEN-45 gel stent offers equally effective IOP control for both phakic and pseudophakic patients. However, the onset of bleb revisions and the necessity for secondary glaucoma surgery differed significantly between the groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144066</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39064106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Cataracts ; Eye surgery ; Failure ; Glaucoma ; Risk factors ; Surgical outcomes ; Survival analysis ; Viscoelasticity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-07, Vol.13 (14), p.4066</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-95c0f386f04c616b28494be7a01229700bfc52d80c2a8f82dfac0fc77967e4483</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1706-126X ; 0009-0009-3375-702X ; 0000-0001-6718-7883 ; 0000-0003-0714-3648</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3084927164/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3084927164?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25744,27915,27916,37003,37004,44581,74887</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39064106$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nasyrov, Emil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merle, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gassel, Caroline J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voykov, Bogomil</creatorcontrib><title>Two-Year Results of XEN Gel Stent Implantation for Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma in Phakic versus Pseudophakic Eyes</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>: To investigate whether phakia affects the outcome of XEN-45 gel stent implantation in the treatment of pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG). : A retrospective, comparative cohort study of 30 phakic and 55 pseudophakic PXG patients who received the XEN-45 gel stent at a tertiary centre. The primary outcome measure was two-year success defined as a ≥20% lowering of intraocular pressure (IOP) and a target IOP of 6-21 mmHg. Success was complete without and qualified irrespective of antiglaucoma medication use. Further glaucoma surgery other than needling was regarded as a failure. The secondary outcome measures included changes in IOP, revision and complication rates. : The complete two-year success rates were 70% and 59% in the phakic and pseudophakic groups, respectively ( = 0.75, log-rank test), and the qualified rates were 80% and 72%, respectively ( = 0.89). The median IOP reduction from baseline was 54% in phakic, and 46% in pseudophakic eyes. While needling rates were similar, the incidence of early incisional bleb revisions was significantly higher in the phakic eyes (13% vs. 0% within 3 months; = 0.0098, chi-square). Increasing after a year, significantly more pseudophakic eyes failed due to secondary glaucoma surgery (16% vs. 0%; = 0.0191). : The XEN-45 gel stent offers equally effective IOP control for both phakic and pseudophakic patients. However, the onset of bleb revisions and the necessity for secondary glaucoma surgery differed significantly between the groups.</description><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Viscoelasticity</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctLAzEQxoMoVtSTdwl4EWQ1rybZo0itBVHxAXpa0nSCW3c3a7Lr4783pVWKc5lh-M3HzHwIHVByynlOzua2ppwKQaTcQDuMKJURrvnmWj1A-zHOSQqtBaNqGw3SpBSUyB3UPn767AVMwPcQ-6qL2Dv8PLrBY6jwQwdNhyd1W5mmM13pG-x8wHcR-pmHL-erMnU_AI8r01tfG1w2-O7VvJUWf0CIfVyx7bI3-oa4h7acqSLsr_IuerocPV5cZde348nF-XVmmWBdlg8tcVxLR4SVVE6ZFrmYgjKEMpYrQqbODtlME8uMdprNnEkDVqlcKhBC8110vNRtg3_vIXZFXUYLVToFfB8LTvSQUi2GKqFH_9C570OTtltQImeKSpGokyVlg48xgCvaUNYmfBeUFAsvijUvEn240uynNcz-2N_P8x_2toNt</recordid><startdate>20240711</startdate><enddate>20240711</enddate><creator>Nasyrov, Emil</creator><creator>Merle, David A</creator><creator>Gassel, Caroline J</creator><creator>Wenzel, Daniel A</creator><creator>Voykov, Bogomil</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1706-126X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3375-702X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-7883</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-3648</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240711</creationdate><title>Two-Year Results of XEN Gel Stent Implantation for Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma in Phakic versus Pseudophakic Eyes</title><author>Nasyrov, Emil ; Merle, David A ; Gassel, Caroline J ; Wenzel, Daniel A ; Voykov, Bogomil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-95c0f386f04c616b28494be7a01229700bfc52d80c2a8f82dfac0fc77967e4483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Viscoelasticity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nasyrov, Emil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merle, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gassel, Caroline J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voykov, Bogomil</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nasyrov, Emil</au><au>Merle, David A</au><au>Gassel, Caroline J</au><au>Wenzel, Daniel A</au><au>Voykov, Bogomil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two-Year Results of XEN Gel Stent Implantation for Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma in Phakic versus Pseudophakic Eyes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2024-07-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>4066</spage><pages>4066-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>: To investigate whether phakia affects the outcome of XEN-45 gel stent implantation in the treatment of pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG). : A retrospective, comparative cohort study of 30 phakic and 55 pseudophakic PXG patients who received the XEN-45 gel stent at a tertiary centre. The primary outcome measure was two-year success defined as a ≥20% lowering of intraocular pressure (IOP) and a target IOP of 6-21 mmHg. Success was complete without and qualified irrespective of antiglaucoma medication use. Further glaucoma surgery other than needling was regarded as a failure. The secondary outcome measures included changes in IOP, revision and complication rates. : The complete two-year success rates were 70% and 59% in the phakic and pseudophakic groups, respectively ( = 0.75, log-rank test), and the qualified rates were 80% and 72%, respectively ( = 0.89). The median IOP reduction from baseline was 54% in phakic, and 46% in pseudophakic eyes. While needling rates were similar, the incidence of early incisional bleb revisions was significantly higher in the phakic eyes (13% vs. 0% within 3 months; = 0.0098, chi-square). Increasing after a year, significantly more pseudophakic eyes failed due to secondary glaucoma surgery (16% vs. 0%; = 0.0191). : The XEN-45 gel stent offers equally effective IOP control for both phakic and pseudophakic patients. However, the onset of bleb revisions and the necessity for secondary glaucoma surgery differed significantly between the groups.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39064106</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm13144066</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1706-126X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3375-702X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-7883</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-3648</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-07, Vol.13 (14), p.4066
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3085118457
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Cataracts
Eye surgery
Failure
Glaucoma
Risk factors
Surgical outcomes
Survival analysis
Viscoelasticity
title Two-Year Results of XEN Gel Stent Implantation for Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma in Phakic versus Pseudophakic Eyes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A46%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two-Year%20Results%20of%20XEN%20Gel%20Stent%20Implantation%20for%20Pseudoexfoliative%20Glaucoma%20in%20Phakic%20versus%20Pseudophakic%20Eyes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Nasyrov,%20Emil&rft.date=2024-07-11&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=4066&rft.pages=4066-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm13144066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3084927164%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-95c0f386f04c616b28494be7a01229700bfc52d80c2a8f82dfac0fc77967e4483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084927164&rft_id=info:pmid/39064106&rfr_iscdi=true