User perception of fluoride mouthwashes for daily use: A randomized clinical trial

To assess user perceptions of different commercially available fluoride mouthwashes (FL-MWs). A single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to a sequence of six different FL-MWs, one of which contained alcohol. For each visit, participants rinsed with o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of dental hygiene 2024-07
Main Authors: Toonen, L S J, van Swaaij, B W M, Timmerman, M F, Van der Weijden, Fridus G A, Slot, D E
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-56233c2e358a9cfe01c3317b116c689fcbc1ae7488d3832aa59fe5d38c36c9b53
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title International journal of dental hygiene
container_volume
creator Toonen, L S J
van Swaaij, B W M
Timmerman, M F
Van der Weijden, Fridus G A
Slot, D E
description To assess user perceptions of different commercially available fluoride mouthwashes (FL-MWs). A single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to a sequence of six different FL-MWs, one of which contained alcohol. For each visit, participants rinsed with one specific mouthwash (15 mL) for 30 s. After rinsing, participants completed a questionnaire with a visual analogue scale. Questions focused on overall taste, mild/pungent feeling, taste duration, foaming effect, burning sensation, sensitivity, numbness, dryness, rinsing time, smell, and colour of the mouthwashes. Descriptive analyses and statistical tests regarding differences among and between the mouthwashes were performed. Overall, 53 participants completed the study protocol, including nine who did, however, not rinse with the alcohol-containing mouthwash due to religious reasons. Among the mouthwashes, significant differences were found for foaming effect, sensitivity, rinsing time, smell, and colour (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/idh.12842
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3086062067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3086062067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-56233c2e358a9cfe01c3317b116c689fcbc1ae7488d3832aa59fe5d38c36c9b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhS0EoqUw8AeQRxhS_KidhK2qeEmVkBCdLce5Vo2cONiJUPn1BFq4Z7hn-HSGD6FLSuZ0vFtXb-eUFQt2hKZUEpoJwvPj_87KCTpL6Z0QNkacogkvSS5yVk7R6yZBxB1EA13vQouDxdYPIboacBOGfvup0xYStiHiWju_w0OCO7zEUbd1aNwX1Nh41zqjPe6j0_4cnVjtE1wc_gxtHu7fVk_Z-uXxebVcZ4ZR0mdCMs4NAy4KXRoLhBrOaV5RKo0sSmsqQzXki6KoecGZ1qK0IMZuuDRlJfgMXe93uxg-Bki9alwy4L1uIQxJcVJIIhmR-Yje7FETQ0oRrOqia3TcKUrUj0I1KlS_Ckf26jA7VA3U_-SfM_4N-MZsEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3086062067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>User perception of fluoride mouthwashes for daily use: A randomized clinical trial</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Toonen, L S J ; van Swaaij, B W M ; Timmerman, M F ; Van der Weijden, Fridus G A ; Slot, D E</creator><creatorcontrib>Toonen, L S J ; van Swaaij, B W M ; Timmerman, M F ; Van der Weijden, Fridus G A ; Slot, D E</creatorcontrib><description>To assess user perceptions of different commercially available fluoride mouthwashes (FL-MWs). A single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to a sequence of six different FL-MWs, one of which contained alcohol. For each visit, participants rinsed with one specific mouthwash (15 mL) for 30 s. After rinsing, participants completed a questionnaire with a visual analogue scale. Questions focused on overall taste, mild/pungent feeling, taste duration, foaming effect, burning sensation, sensitivity, numbness, dryness, rinsing time, smell, and colour of the mouthwashes. Descriptive analyses and statistical tests regarding differences among and between the mouthwashes were performed. Overall, 53 participants completed the study protocol, including nine who did, however, not rinse with the alcohol-containing mouthwash due to religious reasons. Among the mouthwashes, significant differences were found for foaming effect, sensitivity, rinsing time, smell, and colour (p &lt; 0.05). Pairwise comparison for smell did not reveal a difference, and foaming was within the acceptance range (low to medium foaming). Coloured mouthwashes were more appreciated than transparent solutions (p = 0.00). The mouthwash containing essential oils and alcohol produced significantly more sensitivity (p = 0.00) and, in general, participants experienced the rinsing time significantly longer (p &lt; 0.05) compared to the non-alcohol-containing mouthwashes. There is heterogeneity in user perceptions and preferences for FL-MWs, with a significant difference in foaming effect, sensitivity, rinsing time, smell, and colour. Coloured mouthwashes are preferred. The mouthwash containing essential oils and alcohol was less acceptable in relation to sensitivity and rinsing time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1601-5029</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1601-5037</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1601-5037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/idh.12842</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39075729</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>International journal of dental hygiene, 2024-07</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Dental Hygiene published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-56233c2e358a9cfe01c3317b116c689fcbc1ae7488d3832aa59fe5d38c36c9b53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7234-0037 ; 0000-0003-1432-6987 ; 0000-0002-5075-8384 ; 0000-0002-7364-8612 ; 0000-0001-6619-853X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39075729$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toonen, L S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Swaaij, B W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmerman, M F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Weijden, Fridus G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slot, D E</creatorcontrib><title>User perception of fluoride mouthwashes for daily use: A randomized clinical trial</title><title>International journal of dental hygiene</title><addtitle>Int J Dent Hyg</addtitle><description>To assess user perceptions of different commercially available fluoride mouthwashes (FL-MWs). A single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to a sequence of six different FL-MWs, one of which contained alcohol. For each visit, participants rinsed with one specific mouthwash (15 mL) for 30 s. After rinsing, participants completed a questionnaire with a visual analogue scale. Questions focused on overall taste, mild/pungent feeling, taste duration, foaming effect, burning sensation, sensitivity, numbness, dryness, rinsing time, smell, and colour of the mouthwashes. Descriptive analyses and statistical tests regarding differences among and between the mouthwashes were performed. Overall, 53 participants completed the study protocol, including nine who did, however, not rinse with the alcohol-containing mouthwash due to religious reasons. Among the mouthwashes, significant differences were found for foaming effect, sensitivity, rinsing time, smell, and colour (p &lt; 0.05). Pairwise comparison for smell did not reveal a difference, and foaming was within the acceptance range (low to medium foaming). Coloured mouthwashes were more appreciated than transparent solutions (p = 0.00). The mouthwash containing essential oils and alcohol produced significantly more sensitivity (p = 0.00) and, in general, participants experienced the rinsing time significantly longer (p &lt; 0.05) compared to the non-alcohol-containing mouthwashes. There is heterogeneity in user perceptions and preferences for FL-MWs, with a significant difference in foaming effect, sensitivity, rinsing time, smell, and colour. Coloured mouthwashes are preferred. The mouthwash containing essential oils and alcohol was less acceptable in relation to sensitivity and rinsing time.</description><issn>1601-5029</issn><issn>1601-5037</issn><issn>1601-5037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhS0EoqUw8AeQRxhS_KidhK2qeEmVkBCdLce5Vo2cONiJUPn1BFq4Z7hn-HSGD6FLSuZ0vFtXb-eUFQt2hKZUEpoJwvPj_87KCTpL6Z0QNkacogkvSS5yVk7R6yZBxB1EA13vQouDxdYPIboacBOGfvup0xYStiHiWju_w0OCO7zEUbd1aNwX1Nh41zqjPe6j0_4cnVjtE1wc_gxtHu7fVk_Z-uXxebVcZ4ZR0mdCMs4NAy4KXRoLhBrOaV5RKo0sSmsqQzXki6KoecGZ1qK0IMZuuDRlJfgMXe93uxg-Bki9alwy4L1uIQxJcVJIIhmR-Yje7FETQ0oRrOqia3TcKUrUj0I1KlS_Ckf26jA7VA3U_-SfM_4N-MZsEw</recordid><startdate>20240729</startdate><enddate>20240729</enddate><creator>Toonen, L S J</creator><creator>van Swaaij, B W M</creator><creator>Timmerman, M F</creator><creator>Van der Weijden, Fridus G A</creator><creator>Slot, D E</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-0037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1432-6987</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-8384</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7364-8612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6619-853X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240729</creationdate><title>User perception of fluoride mouthwashes for daily use: A randomized clinical trial</title><author>Toonen, L S J ; van Swaaij, B W M ; Timmerman, M F ; Van der Weijden, Fridus G A ; Slot, D E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-56233c2e358a9cfe01c3317b116c689fcbc1ae7488d3832aa59fe5d38c36c9b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toonen, L S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Swaaij, B W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmerman, M F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Weijden, Fridus G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slot, D E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of dental hygiene</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toonen, L S J</au><au>van Swaaij, B W M</au><au>Timmerman, M F</au><au>Van der Weijden, Fridus G A</au><au>Slot, D E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>User perception of fluoride mouthwashes for daily use: A randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>International journal of dental hygiene</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Dent Hyg</addtitle><date>2024-07-29</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1601-5029</issn><issn>1601-5037</issn><eissn>1601-5037</eissn><abstract>To assess user perceptions of different commercially available fluoride mouthwashes (FL-MWs). A single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to a sequence of six different FL-MWs, one of which contained alcohol. For each visit, participants rinsed with one specific mouthwash (15 mL) for 30 s. After rinsing, participants completed a questionnaire with a visual analogue scale. Questions focused on overall taste, mild/pungent feeling, taste duration, foaming effect, burning sensation, sensitivity, numbness, dryness, rinsing time, smell, and colour of the mouthwashes. Descriptive analyses and statistical tests regarding differences among and between the mouthwashes were performed. Overall, 53 participants completed the study protocol, including nine who did, however, not rinse with the alcohol-containing mouthwash due to religious reasons. Among the mouthwashes, significant differences were found for foaming effect, sensitivity, rinsing time, smell, and colour (p &lt; 0.05). Pairwise comparison for smell did not reveal a difference, and foaming was within the acceptance range (low to medium foaming). Coloured mouthwashes were more appreciated than transparent solutions (p = 0.00). The mouthwash containing essential oils and alcohol produced significantly more sensitivity (p = 0.00) and, in general, participants experienced the rinsing time significantly longer (p &lt; 0.05) compared to the non-alcohol-containing mouthwashes. There is heterogeneity in user perceptions and preferences for FL-MWs, with a significant difference in foaming effect, sensitivity, rinsing time, smell, and colour. Coloured mouthwashes are preferred. The mouthwash containing essential oils and alcohol was less acceptable in relation to sensitivity and rinsing time.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39075729</pmid><doi>10.1111/idh.12842</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-0037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1432-6987</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-8384</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7364-8612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6619-853X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1601-5029
ispartof International journal of dental hygiene, 2024-07
issn 1601-5029
1601-5037
1601-5037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3086062067
source Wiley
title User perception of fluoride mouthwashes for daily use: A randomized clinical trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A36%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=User%20perception%20of%20fluoride%20mouthwashes%20for%20daily%20use:%20A%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20dental%20hygiene&rft.au=Toonen,%20L%20S%20J&rft.date=2024-07-29&rft.issn=1601-5029&rft.eissn=1601-5037&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/idh.12842&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3086062067%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-56233c2e358a9cfe01c3317b116c689fcbc1ae7488d3832aa59fe5d38c36c9b53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3086062067&rft_id=info:pmid/39075729&rfr_iscdi=true