Loading…
Prevalence and prenatal diagnosis of congenital eye anomalies: A population‐based study
Objective To estimate the prevalence and trend of congenital eye anomalies (CEAs) and the rate of prenatal diagnosis over a 10‐year period. Design Retrospective population‐based registry study. Setting All maternity units in Paris, France, from 2010 to 2020. Population A cohort of 115 cases of CEA d...
Saved in:
Published in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2024-09, Vol.131 (10), p.1385-1391 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3667-3d4ab7f0f7f9c79148b8f1921e14962246a103a7f66093a65ebf353407ec14b33 |
container_end_page | 1391 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1385 |
container_title | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Maillet, Corentin Guilbaud, Lucie Monier, Isabelle Khoshnood, Babak Quoc, Emmanuel Bui Dugas, Anais Lelong, Nathalie Jouannic, Jean‐Marie |
description | Objective
To estimate the prevalence and trend of congenital eye anomalies (CEAs) and the rate of prenatal diagnosis over a 10‐year period.
Design
Retrospective population‐based registry study.
Setting
All maternity units in Paris, France, from 2010 to 2020.
Population
A cohort of 115 cases of CEA detected among all live births or stillbirths, after 22 weeks of gestation, and terminations of pregnancy.
Methods
The total prevalence of CEAs and prevalence of each specific CEA were calculated using 95% Poisson exact confidence intervals.
Main outcome measures
The total prevalence of CEAs and the proportion of prenatal diagnosis of CEAs, and their evolution.
Results
The prevalence of CEAs was 4.1 (95% CI 3.4–5.0) cases, ranging between 3.1 and 5.7 cases, per 10 000 births. CEAs were prenatally diagnosed in 23.5% of cases. CEAs were bilateral in 51 cases (44.3%), unilateral in 43 cases (37.4%) and missing or unknown in 21 cases (18.3%). Of those with CEAs, 20.9% had genetic anomalies and 53.0% had at least one other extraocular anomaly. When detected prenatally, CEAs were bilateral in 15 cases (55.6%), unilateral in eight cases (29.6%) and missing in the four remaining cases. The prenatal diagnosis rate of CEAs associated with genetic anomalies, CEA cases with at least one other malformation and isolated CEA cases were 29.2%, 26.2% and 13.3%, respectively.
Conclusions
In total, 115 cases of CEAs were observed during the study period, representing a total prevalence of 4.1 cases per 10 000 births. The overall prenatal detection rate of CEAs in our population was 23.5%, which dropped to 13.3% for isolated cases of CEAs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1471-0528.17817 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3087349727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3087015277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3667-3d4ab7f0f7f9c79148b8f1921e14962246a103a7f66093a65ebf353407ec14b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0LtOwzAUBmALgWgpzGwoEgtLWl-SOGErFVdVKgMMTJaTHFepEjvECSgbj8Az8iQkTWFgwYuto8-_jn6ETgmeku7MiMeJi30aTgkPCd9D49_J_vaNXcxoOEJH1m4wJgHF7BCNWNgBRukYvTxW8CZz0Ak4UqdOWYGWtcydNJNrbWxmHaOcxOg16KyfQ9tDU8g8A3vpzJ3SlE0u68zor4_PWFpIHVs3aXuMDpTMLZzs7gl6vrl-Wty5y9Xt_WK-dBMWBNxlqSdjrrDiKkp4RLwwDhWJKAHiRQGlXiAJZpKrIMARk4EPsWI-8zCHhHgxYxN0MeSWlXltwNaiyGwCeS41mMYKhkPOvIhT3tHzP3Rjmkp3220VJj7lvZoNKqmMtRUoUVZZIatWECz61kXfseg7FtvWux9nu9wmLiD99T81d8AfwHuWQ_tfnrh6WA3B3xm7i3I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087015277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence and prenatal diagnosis of congenital eye anomalies: A population‐based study</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Maillet, Corentin ; Guilbaud, Lucie ; Monier, Isabelle ; Khoshnood, Babak ; Quoc, Emmanuel Bui ; Dugas, Anais ; Lelong, Nathalie ; Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</creator><creatorcontrib>Maillet, Corentin ; Guilbaud, Lucie ; Monier, Isabelle ; Khoshnood, Babak ; Quoc, Emmanuel Bui ; Dugas, Anais ; Lelong, Nathalie ; Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To estimate the prevalence and trend of congenital eye anomalies (CEAs) and the rate of prenatal diagnosis over a 10‐year period.
Design
Retrospective population‐based registry study.
Setting
All maternity units in Paris, France, from 2010 to 2020.
Population
A cohort of 115 cases of CEA detected among all live births or stillbirths, after 22 weeks of gestation, and terminations of pregnancy.
Methods
The total prevalence of CEAs and prevalence of each specific CEA were calculated using 95% Poisson exact confidence intervals.
Main outcome measures
The total prevalence of CEAs and the proportion of prenatal diagnosis of CEAs, and their evolution.
Results
The prevalence of CEAs was 4.1 (95% CI 3.4–5.0) cases, ranging between 3.1 and 5.7 cases, per 10 000 births. CEAs were prenatally diagnosed in 23.5% of cases. CEAs were bilateral in 51 cases (44.3%), unilateral in 43 cases (37.4%) and missing or unknown in 21 cases (18.3%). Of those with CEAs, 20.9% had genetic anomalies and 53.0% had at least one other extraocular anomaly. When detected prenatally, CEAs were bilateral in 15 cases (55.6%), unilateral in eight cases (29.6%) and missing in the four remaining cases. The prenatal diagnosis rate of CEAs associated with genetic anomalies, CEA cases with at least one other malformation and isolated CEA cases were 29.2%, 26.2% and 13.3%, respectively.
Conclusions
In total, 115 cases of CEAs were observed during the study period, representing a total prevalence of 4.1 cases per 10 000 births. The overall prenatal detection rate of CEAs in our population was 23.5%, which dropped to 13.3% for isolated cases of CEAs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17817</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38528322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; anophthalmia ; Births ; cataract ; congenital eye anomalies ; Eye Abnormalities - diagnosis ; Eye Abnormalities - epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Medical diagnosis ; microphthalmia ; Paris - epidemiology ; Population studies ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal diagnosis ; Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics & numerical data ; Prevalence ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies ; ultrasound</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2024-09, Vol.131 (10), p.1385-1391</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3667-3d4ab7f0f7f9c79148b8f1921e14962246a103a7f66093a65ebf353407ec14b33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4031-4915 ; 0000-0002-7890-3790</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38528322$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maillet, Corentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilbaud, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monier, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoshnood, Babak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quoc, Emmanuel Bui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugas, Anais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lelong, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence and prenatal diagnosis of congenital eye anomalies: A population‐based study</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective
To estimate the prevalence and trend of congenital eye anomalies (CEAs) and the rate of prenatal diagnosis over a 10‐year period.
Design
Retrospective population‐based registry study.
Setting
All maternity units in Paris, France, from 2010 to 2020.
Population
A cohort of 115 cases of CEA detected among all live births or stillbirths, after 22 weeks of gestation, and terminations of pregnancy.
Methods
The total prevalence of CEAs and prevalence of each specific CEA were calculated using 95% Poisson exact confidence intervals.
Main outcome measures
The total prevalence of CEAs and the proportion of prenatal diagnosis of CEAs, and their evolution.
Results
The prevalence of CEAs was 4.1 (95% CI 3.4–5.0) cases, ranging between 3.1 and 5.7 cases, per 10 000 births. CEAs were prenatally diagnosed in 23.5% of cases. CEAs were bilateral in 51 cases (44.3%), unilateral in 43 cases (37.4%) and missing or unknown in 21 cases (18.3%). Of those with CEAs, 20.9% had genetic anomalies and 53.0% had at least one other extraocular anomaly. When detected prenatally, CEAs were bilateral in 15 cases (55.6%), unilateral in eight cases (29.6%) and missing in the four remaining cases. The prenatal diagnosis rate of CEAs associated with genetic anomalies, CEA cases with at least one other malformation and isolated CEA cases were 29.2%, 26.2% and 13.3%, respectively.
Conclusions
In total, 115 cases of CEAs were observed during the study period, representing a total prevalence of 4.1 cases per 10 000 births. The overall prenatal detection rate of CEAs in our population was 23.5%, which dropped to 13.3% for isolated cases of CEAs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>anophthalmia</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>cataract</subject><subject>congenital eye anomalies</subject><subject>Eye Abnormalities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Eye Abnormalities - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>microphthalmia</subject><subject>Paris - epidemiology</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>ultrasound</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0LtOwzAUBmALgWgpzGwoEgtLWl-SOGErFVdVKgMMTJaTHFepEjvECSgbj8Az8iQkTWFgwYuto8-_jn6ETgmeku7MiMeJi30aTgkPCd9D49_J_vaNXcxoOEJH1m4wJgHF7BCNWNgBRukYvTxW8CZz0Ak4UqdOWYGWtcydNJNrbWxmHaOcxOg16KyfQ9tDU8g8A3vpzJ3SlE0u68zor4_PWFpIHVs3aXuMDpTMLZzs7gl6vrl-Wty5y9Xt_WK-dBMWBNxlqSdjrrDiKkp4RLwwDhWJKAHiRQGlXiAJZpKrIMARk4EPsWI-8zCHhHgxYxN0MeSWlXltwNaiyGwCeS41mMYKhkPOvIhT3tHzP3Rjmkp3220VJj7lvZoNKqmMtRUoUVZZIatWECz61kXfseg7FtvWux9nu9wmLiD99T81d8AfwHuWQ_tfnrh6WA3B3xm7i3I</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Maillet, Corentin</creator><creator>Guilbaud, Lucie</creator><creator>Monier, Isabelle</creator><creator>Khoshnood, Babak</creator><creator>Quoc, Emmanuel Bui</creator><creator>Dugas, Anais</creator><creator>Lelong, Nathalie</creator><creator>Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-4915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-3790</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Prevalence and prenatal diagnosis of congenital eye anomalies: A population‐based study</title><author>Maillet, Corentin ; Guilbaud, Lucie ; Monier, Isabelle ; Khoshnood, Babak ; Quoc, Emmanuel Bui ; Dugas, Anais ; Lelong, Nathalie ; Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3667-3d4ab7f0f7f9c79148b8f1921e14962246a103a7f66093a65ebf353407ec14b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>anophthalmia</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>cataract</topic><topic>congenital eye anomalies</topic><topic>Eye Abnormalities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Eye Abnormalities - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>microphthalmia</topic><topic>Paris - epidemiology</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maillet, Corentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilbaud, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monier, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoshnood, Babak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quoc, Emmanuel Bui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugas, Anais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lelong, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maillet, Corentin</au><au>Guilbaud, Lucie</au><au>Monier, Isabelle</au><au>Khoshnood, Babak</au><au>Quoc, Emmanuel Bui</au><au>Dugas, Anais</au><au>Lelong, Nathalie</au><au>Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence and prenatal diagnosis of congenital eye anomalies: A population‐based study</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1385</spage><epage>1391</epage><pages>1385-1391</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><abstract>Objective
To estimate the prevalence and trend of congenital eye anomalies (CEAs) and the rate of prenatal diagnosis over a 10‐year period.
Design
Retrospective population‐based registry study.
Setting
All maternity units in Paris, France, from 2010 to 2020.
Population
A cohort of 115 cases of CEA detected among all live births or stillbirths, after 22 weeks of gestation, and terminations of pregnancy.
Methods
The total prevalence of CEAs and prevalence of each specific CEA were calculated using 95% Poisson exact confidence intervals.
Main outcome measures
The total prevalence of CEAs and the proportion of prenatal diagnosis of CEAs, and their evolution.
Results
The prevalence of CEAs was 4.1 (95% CI 3.4–5.0) cases, ranging between 3.1 and 5.7 cases, per 10 000 births. CEAs were prenatally diagnosed in 23.5% of cases. CEAs were bilateral in 51 cases (44.3%), unilateral in 43 cases (37.4%) and missing or unknown in 21 cases (18.3%). Of those with CEAs, 20.9% had genetic anomalies and 53.0% had at least one other extraocular anomaly. When detected prenatally, CEAs were bilateral in 15 cases (55.6%), unilateral in eight cases (29.6%) and missing in the four remaining cases. The prenatal diagnosis rate of CEAs associated with genetic anomalies, CEA cases with at least one other malformation and isolated CEA cases were 29.2%, 26.2% and 13.3%, respectively.
Conclusions
In total, 115 cases of CEAs were observed during the study period, representing a total prevalence of 4.1 cases per 10 000 births. The overall prenatal detection rate of CEAs in our population was 23.5%, which dropped to 13.3% for isolated cases of CEAs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38528322</pmid><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.17817</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-4915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-3790</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-0328 |
ispartof | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2024-09, Vol.131 (10), p.1385-1391 |
issn | 1470-0328 1471-0528 1471-0528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3087349727 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Adult anophthalmia Births cataract congenital eye anomalies Eye Abnormalities - diagnosis Eye Abnormalities - epidemiology Female Humans Medical diagnosis microphthalmia Paris - epidemiology Population studies Pregnancy Prenatal diagnosis Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics & numerical data Prevalence Registries Retrospective Studies ultrasound |
title | Prevalence and prenatal diagnosis of congenital eye anomalies: A population‐based study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A23%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20and%20prenatal%20diagnosis%20of%20congenital%20eye%20anomalies:%20A%20population%E2%80%90based%20study&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Maillet,%20Corentin&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1385&rft.epage=1391&rft.pages=1385-1391&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17817&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3087015277%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3667-3d4ab7f0f7f9c79148b8f1921e14962246a103a7f66093a65ebf353407ec14b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087015277&rft_id=info:pmid/38528322&rfr_iscdi=true |