Loading…

Prevalence and prenatal diagnosis of congenital eye anomalies: A population‐based study

Objective To estimate the prevalence and trend of congenital eye anomalies (CEAs) and the rate of prenatal diagnosis over a 10‐year period. Design Retrospective population‐based registry study. Setting All maternity units in Paris, France, from 2010 to 2020. Population A cohort of 115 cases of CEA d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2024-09, Vol.131 (10), p.1385-1391
Main Authors: Maillet, Corentin, Guilbaud, Lucie, Monier, Isabelle, Khoshnood, Babak, Quoc, Emmanuel Bui, Dugas, Anais, Lelong, Nathalie, Jouannic, Jean‐Marie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3667-3d4ab7f0f7f9c79148b8f1921e14962246a103a7f66093a65ebf353407ec14b33
container_end_page 1391
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1385
container_title BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 131
creator Maillet, Corentin
Guilbaud, Lucie
Monier, Isabelle
Khoshnood, Babak
Quoc, Emmanuel Bui
Dugas, Anais
Lelong, Nathalie
Jouannic, Jean‐Marie
description Objective To estimate the prevalence and trend of congenital eye anomalies (CEAs) and the rate of prenatal diagnosis over a 10‐year period. Design Retrospective population‐based registry study. Setting All maternity units in Paris, France, from 2010 to 2020. Population A cohort of 115 cases of CEA detected among all live births or stillbirths, after 22 weeks of gestation, and terminations of pregnancy. Methods The total prevalence of CEAs and prevalence of each specific CEA were calculated using 95% Poisson exact confidence intervals. Main outcome measures The total prevalence of CEAs and the proportion of prenatal diagnosis of CEAs, and their evolution. Results The prevalence of CEAs was 4.1 (95% CI 3.4–5.0) cases, ranging between 3.1 and 5.7 cases, per 10 000 births. CEAs were prenatally diagnosed in 23.5% of cases. CEAs were bilateral in 51 cases (44.3%), unilateral in 43 cases (37.4%) and missing or unknown in 21 cases (18.3%). Of those with CEAs, 20.9% had genetic anomalies and 53.0% had at least one other extraocular anomaly. When detected prenatally, CEAs were bilateral in 15 cases (55.6%), unilateral in eight cases (29.6%) and missing in the four remaining cases. The prenatal diagnosis rate of CEAs associated with genetic anomalies, CEA cases with at least one other malformation and isolated CEA cases were 29.2%, 26.2% and 13.3%, respectively. Conclusions In total, 115 cases of CEAs were observed during the study period, representing a total prevalence of 4.1 cases per 10 000 births. The overall prenatal detection rate of CEAs in our population was 23.5%, which dropped to 13.3% for isolated cases of CEAs.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1471-0528.17817
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3087349727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3087015277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3667-3d4ab7f0f7f9c79148b8f1921e14962246a103a7f66093a65ebf353407ec14b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0LtOwzAUBmALgWgpzGwoEgtLWl-SOGErFVdVKgMMTJaTHFepEjvECSgbj8Az8iQkTWFgwYuto8-_jn6ETgmeku7MiMeJi30aTgkPCd9D49_J_vaNXcxoOEJH1m4wJgHF7BCNWNgBRukYvTxW8CZz0Ak4UqdOWYGWtcydNJNrbWxmHaOcxOg16KyfQ9tDU8g8A3vpzJ3SlE0u68zor4_PWFpIHVs3aXuMDpTMLZzs7gl6vrl-Wty5y9Xt_WK-dBMWBNxlqSdjrrDiKkp4RLwwDhWJKAHiRQGlXiAJZpKrIMARk4EPsWI-8zCHhHgxYxN0MeSWlXltwNaiyGwCeS41mMYKhkPOvIhT3tHzP3Rjmkp3220VJj7lvZoNKqmMtRUoUVZZIatWECz61kXfseg7FtvWux9nu9wmLiD99T81d8AfwHuWQ_tfnrh6WA3B3xm7i3I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087015277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence and prenatal diagnosis of congenital eye anomalies: A population‐based study</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Maillet, Corentin ; Guilbaud, Lucie ; Monier, Isabelle ; Khoshnood, Babak ; Quoc, Emmanuel Bui ; Dugas, Anais ; Lelong, Nathalie ; Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</creator><creatorcontrib>Maillet, Corentin ; Guilbaud, Lucie ; Monier, Isabelle ; Khoshnood, Babak ; Quoc, Emmanuel Bui ; Dugas, Anais ; Lelong, Nathalie ; Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To estimate the prevalence and trend of congenital eye anomalies (CEAs) and the rate of prenatal diagnosis over a 10‐year period. Design Retrospective population‐based registry study. Setting All maternity units in Paris, France, from 2010 to 2020. Population A cohort of 115 cases of CEA detected among all live births or stillbirths, after 22 weeks of gestation, and terminations of pregnancy. Methods The total prevalence of CEAs and prevalence of each specific CEA were calculated using 95% Poisson exact confidence intervals. Main outcome measures The total prevalence of CEAs and the proportion of prenatal diagnosis of CEAs, and their evolution. Results The prevalence of CEAs was 4.1 (95% CI 3.4–5.0) cases, ranging between 3.1 and 5.7 cases, per 10 000 births. CEAs were prenatally diagnosed in 23.5% of cases. CEAs were bilateral in 51 cases (44.3%), unilateral in 43 cases (37.4%) and missing or unknown in 21 cases (18.3%). Of those with CEAs, 20.9% had genetic anomalies and 53.0% had at least one other extraocular anomaly. When detected prenatally, CEAs were bilateral in 15 cases (55.6%), unilateral in eight cases (29.6%) and missing in the four remaining cases. The prenatal diagnosis rate of CEAs associated with genetic anomalies, CEA cases with at least one other malformation and isolated CEA cases were 29.2%, 26.2% and 13.3%, respectively. Conclusions In total, 115 cases of CEAs were observed during the study period, representing a total prevalence of 4.1 cases per 10 000 births. The overall prenatal detection rate of CEAs in our population was 23.5%, which dropped to 13.3% for isolated cases of CEAs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17817</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38528322</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; anophthalmia ; Births ; cataract ; congenital eye anomalies ; Eye Abnormalities - diagnosis ; Eye Abnormalities - epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Medical diagnosis ; microphthalmia ; Paris - epidemiology ; Population studies ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal diagnosis ; Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Prevalence ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies ; ultrasound</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2024-09, Vol.131 (10), p.1385-1391</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3667-3d4ab7f0f7f9c79148b8f1921e14962246a103a7f66093a65ebf353407ec14b33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4031-4915 ; 0000-0002-7890-3790</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38528322$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maillet, Corentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilbaud, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monier, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoshnood, Babak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quoc, Emmanuel Bui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugas, Anais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lelong, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence and prenatal diagnosis of congenital eye anomalies: A population‐based study</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective To estimate the prevalence and trend of congenital eye anomalies (CEAs) and the rate of prenatal diagnosis over a 10‐year period. Design Retrospective population‐based registry study. Setting All maternity units in Paris, France, from 2010 to 2020. Population A cohort of 115 cases of CEA detected among all live births or stillbirths, after 22 weeks of gestation, and terminations of pregnancy. Methods The total prevalence of CEAs and prevalence of each specific CEA were calculated using 95% Poisson exact confidence intervals. Main outcome measures The total prevalence of CEAs and the proportion of prenatal diagnosis of CEAs, and their evolution. Results The prevalence of CEAs was 4.1 (95% CI 3.4–5.0) cases, ranging between 3.1 and 5.7 cases, per 10 000 births. CEAs were prenatally diagnosed in 23.5% of cases. CEAs were bilateral in 51 cases (44.3%), unilateral in 43 cases (37.4%) and missing or unknown in 21 cases (18.3%). Of those with CEAs, 20.9% had genetic anomalies and 53.0% had at least one other extraocular anomaly. When detected prenatally, CEAs were bilateral in 15 cases (55.6%), unilateral in eight cases (29.6%) and missing in the four remaining cases. The prenatal diagnosis rate of CEAs associated with genetic anomalies, CEA cases with at least one other malformation and isolated CEA cases were 29.2%, 26.2% and 13.3%, respectively. Conclusions In total, 115 cases of CEAs were observed during the study period, representing a total prevalence of 4.1 cases per 10 000 births. The overall prenatal detection rate of CEAs in our population was 23.5%, which dropped to 13.3% for isolated cases of CEAs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>anophthalmia</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>cataract</subject><subject>congenital eye anomalies</subject><subject>Eye Abnormalities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Eye Abnormalities - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>microphthalmia</subject><subject>Paris - epidemiology</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>ultrasound</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0LtOwzAUBmALgWgpzGwoEgtLWl-SOGErFVdVKgMMTJaTHFepEjvECSgbj8Az8iQkTWFgwYuto8-_jn6ETgmeku7MiMeJi30aTgkPCd9D49_J_vaNXcxoOEJH1m4wJgHF7BCNWNgBRukYvTxW8CZz0Ak4UqdOWYGWtcydNJNrbWxmHaOcxOg16KyfQ9tDU8g8A3vpzJ3SlE0u68zor4_PWFpIHVs3aXuMDpTMLZzs7gl6vrl-Wty5y9Xt_WK-dBMWBNxlqSdjrrDiKkp4RLwwDhWJKAHiRQGlXiAJZpKrIMARk4EPsWI-8zCHhHgxYxN0MeSWlXltwNaiyGwCeS41mMYKhkPOvIhT3tHzP3Rjmkp3220VJj7lvZoNKqmMtRUoUVZZIatWECz61kXfseg7FtvWux9nu9wmLiD99T81d8AfwHuWQ_tfnrh6WA3B3xm7i3I</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Maillet, Corentin</creator><creator>Guilbaud, Lucie</creator><creator>Monier, Isabelle</creator><creator>Khoshnood, Babak</creator><creator>Quoc, Emmanuel Bui</creator><creator>Dugas, Anais</creator><creator>Lelong, Nathalie</creator><creator>Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-4915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-3790</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Prevalence and prenatal diagnosis of congenital eye anomalies: A population‐based study</title><author>Maillet, Corentin ; Guilbaud, Lucie ; Monier, Isabelle ; Khoshnood, Babak ; Quoc, Emmanuel Bui ; Dugas, Anais ; Lelong, Nathalie ; Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3667-3d4ab7f0f7f9c79148b8f1921e14962246a103a7f66093a65ebf353407ec14b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>anophthalmia</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>cataract</topic><topic>congenital eye anomalies</topic><topic>Eye Abnormalities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Eye Abnormalities - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>microphthalmia</topic><topic>Paris - epidemiology</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maillet, Corentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilbaud, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monier, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoshnood, Babak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quoc, Emmanuel Bui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugas, Anais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lelong, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maillet, Corentin</au><au>Guilbaud, Lucie</au><au>Monier, Isabelle</au><au>Khoshnood, Babak</au><au>Quoc, Emmanuel Bui</au><au>Dugas, Anais</au><au>Lelong, Nathalie</au><au>Jouannic, Jean‐Marie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence and prenatal diagnosis of congenital eye anomalies: A population‐based study</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1385</spage><epage>1391</epage><pages>1385-1391</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><abstract>Objective To estimate the prevalence and trend of congenital eye anomalies (CEAs) and the rate of prenatal diagnosis over a 10‐year period. Design Retrospective population‐based registry study. Setting All maternity units in Paris, France, from 2010 to 2020. Population A cohort of 115 cases of CEA detected among all live births or stillbirths, after 22 weeks of gestation, and terminations of pregnancy. Methods The total prevalence of CEAs and prevalence of each specific CEA were calculated using 95% Poisson exact confidence intervals. Main outcome measures The total prevalence of CEAs and the proportion of prenatal diagnosis of CEAs, and their evolution. Results The prevalence of CEAs was 4.1 (95% CI 3.4–5.0) cases, ranging between 3.1 and 5.7 cases, per 10 000 births. CEAs were prenatally diagnosed in 23.5% of cases. CEAs were bilateral in 51 cases (44.3%), unilateral in 43 cases (37.4%) and missing or unknown in 21 cases (18.3%). Of those with CEAs, 20.9% had genetic anomalies and 53.0% had at least one other extraocular anomaly. When detected prenatally, CEAs were bilateral in 15 cases (55.6%), unilateral in eight cases (29.6%) and missing in the four remaining cases. The prenatal diagnosis rate of CEAs associated with genetic anomalies, CEA cases with at least one other malformation and isolated CEA cases were 29.2%, 26.2% and 13.3%, respectively. Conclusions In total, 115 cases of CEAs were observed during the study period, representing a total prevalence of 4.1 cases per 10 000 births. The overall prenatal detection rate of CEAs in our population was 23.5%, which dropped to 13.3% for isolated cases of CEAs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38528322</pmid><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.17817</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-4915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-3790</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-0328
ispartof BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2024-09, Vol.131 (10), p.1385-1391
issn 1470-0328
1471-0528
1471-0528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3087349727
source Wiley
subjects Adult
anophthalmia
Births
cataract
congenital eye anomalies
Eye Abnormalities - diagnosis
Eye Abnormalities - epidemiology
Female
Humans
Medical diagnosis
microphthalmia
Paris - epidemiology
Population studies
Pregnancy
Prenatal diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics & numerical data
Prevalence
Registries
Retrospective Studies
ultrasound
title Prevalence and prenatal diagnosis of congenital eye anomalies: A population‐based study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A23%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20and%20prenatal%20diagnosis%20of%20congenital%20eye%20anomalies:%20A%20population%E2%80%90based%20study&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Maillet,%20Corentin&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1385&rft.epage=1391&rft.pages=1385-1391&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17817&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3087015277%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3667-3d4ab7f0f7f9c79148b8f1921e14962246a103a7f66093a65ebf353407ec14b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087015277&rft_id=info:pmid/38528322&rfr_iscdi=true