Loading…
A difference in application time between two direct orthodontic bonding methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial
Objective This clinical study aimed to evaluate the difference in the time of application phase, employing the conventional and modified direct orthodontic bonding method. Materials and Methods Thirty patients who needed orthodontic therapy with fixed appliances were randomly divided into two equal...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2024-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1477-1484 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2462-a4cf2b230c68d8ca160286ed90108a3647dbcab580f2e060e25d787010a86bdb3 |
| container_end_page | 1484 |
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1477 |
| container_title | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Mitic, Vladimir Todorovic, Ana Mitic, Aleksandar |
| description | Objective
This clinical study aimed to evaluate the difference in the time of application phase, employing the conventional and modified direct orthodontic bonding method.
Materials and Methods
Thirty patients who needed orthodontic therapy with fixed appliances were randomly divided into two equal groups (n = 15): the control and experimental group, according to the bonding method applied. A total of 600 metal brackets inch slot 0.022 (Mini Sprint®, Forestadent, Germany) were bonded to incisors, canines, and premolars using the light‐cured adhesive Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). The failure rates of the brackets were evaluated within 12 months. The independent samples t‐test was applied. The Chi‐square test and Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis.
Results
The initial bonding time using the modified method was significantly shorter (3.27 min or 17.1% per patient) compared with the conventional bonding method (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jerd.13282 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3087563466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3114482343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2462-a4cf2b230c68d8ca160286ed90108a3647dbcab580f2e060e25d787010a86bdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpaZJNLv0BRdBLCDjRl2W5t2WbfrEQCMlZyNK41WJLruTNNv310XbTHnqoLqMZPTyMeBF6Q8klLedqA8ldUs4Ue4GOaUNUpZggL8tdtLIStK6P0EnOG0Jo3bTNa3TEW9LWqmHH6OcSO9_3kCBYwD5gM02Dt2b2MeDZj4A7mHcApdnFgiawM45p_h5dDLO3uIvB-fANj7Cf5fd4iacU81Q4_wA4meDi6H-Bw3bwoZgHPCdvhlP0qjdDhrPnukD3H6_vVp-r9c2nL6vlurJMSFYZYXvWMU6sVE5ZQyVhSoJrCSXKcCka11nT1Yr0DIgkwGrXqKa8GiU71_EFOj94y1Y_tpBnPfpsYRhMgLjNmhPV1JILKQv67h90E7cplO00p1QIxbjghbo4ULZ8Myfo9ZT8aNKjpkTv89D7PPTvPAr89lm57UZwf9E_ARSAHoCdH-DxPyr99fr2w0H6BMiglmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3114482343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A difference in application time between two direct orthodontic bonding methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Mitic, Vladimir ; Todorovic, Ana ; Mitic, Aleksandar</creator><creatorcontrib>Mitic, Vladimir ; Todorovic, Ana ; Mitic, Aleksandar</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
This clinical study aimed to evaluate the difference in the time of application phase, employing the conventional and modified direct orthodontic bonding method.
Materials and Methods
Thirty patients who needed orthodontic therapy with fixed appliances were randomly divided into two equal groups (n = 15): the control and experimental group, according to the bonding method applied. A total of 600 metal brackets inch slot 0.022 (Mini Sprint®, Forestadent, Germany) were bonded to incisors, canines, and premolars using the light‐cured adhesive Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). The failure rates of the brackets were evaluated within 12 months. The independent samples t‐test was applied. The Chi‐square test and Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis.
Results
The initial bonding time using the modified method was significantly shorter (3.27 min or 17.1% per patient) compared with the conventional bonding method (p < 0.001). Number of failed brackets between the two methods did not differ significantly (p = 0.226).
Conclusion
The time of the application phase in initial bonding using the modified method (experimental group) was shorter than in control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of bond failures between the two methods.
Clinical Significance
The modified application phase of direct orthodontic bracket placement shortens the total bonding time and facilitates the manual work of orthodontists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1496-4155</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1708-8240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13282</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39095872</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; application phase ; bond failures ; Canine teeth ; chair time saving ; Dental Bonding - methods ; dentistry ; direct bonding ; Female ; Humans ; Incisors ; Male ; metal brackets ; Methods ; Orthodontic Brackets ; Orthodontics ; Premolars ; Prospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry, 2024-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1477-1484</ispartof><rights>2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2462-a4cf2b230c68d8ca160286ed90108a3647dbcab580f2e060e25d787010a86bdb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5591-805X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39095872$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mitic, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todorovic, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitic, Aleksandar</creatorcontrib><title>A difference in application time between two direct orthodontic bonding methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial</title><title>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry</title><addtitle>J Esthet Restor Dent</addtitle><description>Objective
This clinical study aimed to evaluate the difference in the time of application phase, employing the conventional and modified direct orthodontic bonding method.
Materials and Methods
Thirty patients who needed orthodontic therapy with fixed appliances were randomly divided into two equal groups (n = 15): the control and experimental group, according to the bonding method applied. A total of 600 metal brackets inch slot 0.022 (Mini Sprint®, Forestadent, Germany) were bonded to incisors, canines, and premolars using the light‐cured adhesive Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). The failure rates of the brackets were evaluated within 12 months. The independent samples t‐test was applied. The Chi‐square test and Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis.
Results
The initial bonding time using the modified method was significantly shorter (3.27 min or 17.1% per patient) compared with the conventional bonding method (p < 0.001). Number of failed brackets between the two methods did not differ significantly (p = 0.226).
Conclusion
The time of the application phase in initial bonding using the modified method (experimental group) was shorter than in control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of bond failures between the two methods.
Clinical Significance
The modified application phase of direct orthodontic bracket placement shortens the total bonding time and facilitates the manual work of orthodontists.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>application phase</subject><subject>bond failures</subject><subject>Canine teeth</subject><subject>chair time saving</subject><subject>Dental Bonding - methods</subject><subject>dentistry</subject><subject>direct bonding</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incisors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>metal brackets</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Orthodontic Brackets</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Premolars</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1496-4155</issn><issn>1708-8240</issn><issn>1708-8240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpaZJNLv0BRdBLCDjRl2W5t2WbfrEQCMlZyNK41WJLruTNNv310XbTHnqoLqMZPTyMeBF6Q8klLedqA8ldUs4Ue4GOaUNUpZggL8tdtLIStK6P0EnOG0Jo3bTNa3TEW9LWqmHH6OcSO9_3kCBYwD5gM02Dt2b2MeDZj4A7mHcApdnFgiawM45p_h5dDLO3uIvB-fANj7Cf5fd4iacU81Q4_wA4meDi6H-Bw3bwoZgHPCdvhlP0qjdDhrPnukD3H6_vVp-r9c2nL6vlurJMSFYZYXvWMU6sVE5ZQyVhSoJrCSXKcCka11nT1Yr0DIgkwGrXqKa8GiU71_EFOj94y1Y_tpBnPfpsYRhMgLjNmhPV1JILKQv67h90E7cplO00p1QIxbjghbo4ULZ8Myfo9ZT8aNKjpkTv89D7PPTvPAr89lm57UZwf9E_ARSAHoCdH-DxPyr99fr2w0H6BMiglmg</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Mitic, Vladimir</creator><creator>Todorovic, Ana</creator><creator>Mitic, Aleksandar</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5591-805X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>A difference in application time between two direct orthodontic bonding methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial</title><author>Mitic, Vladimir ; Todorovic, Ana ; Mitic, Aleksandar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2462-a4cf2b230c68d8ca160286ed90108a3647dbcab580f2e060e25d787010a86bdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>application phase</topic><topic>bond failures</topic><topic>Canine teeth</topic><topic>chair time saving</topic><topic>Dental Bonding - methods</topic><topic>dentistry</topic><topic>direct bonding</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incisors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>metal brackets</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Orthodontic Brackets</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Premolars</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mitic, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todorovic, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitic, Aleksandar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mitic, Vladimir</au><au>Todorovic, Ana</au><au>Mitic, Aleksandar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A difference in application time between two direct orthodontic bonding methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Esthet Restor Dent</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1477</spage><epage>1484</epage><pages>1477-1484</pages><issn>1496-4155</issn><issn>1708-8240</issn><eissn>1708-8240</eissn><abstract>Objective
This clinical study aimed to evaluate the difference in the time of application phase, employing the conventional and modified direct orthodontic bonding method.
Materials and Methods
Thirty patients who needed orthodontic therapy with fixed appliances were randomly divided into two equal groups (n = 15): the control and experimental group, according to the bonding method applied. A total of 600 metal brackets inch slot 0.022 (Mini Sprint®, Forestadent, Germany) were bonded to incisors, canines, and premolars using the light‐cured adhesive Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). The failure rates of the brackets were evaluated within 12 months. The independent samples t‐test was applied. The Chi‐square test and Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis.
Results
The initial bonding time using the modified method was significantly shorter (3.27 min or 17.1% per patient) compared with the conventional bonding method (p < 0.001). Number of failed brackets between the two methods did not differ significantly (p = 0.226).
Conclusion
The time of the application phase in initial bonding using the modified method (experimental group) was shorter than in control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of bond failures between the two methods.
Clinical Significance
The modified application phase of direct orthodontic bracket placement shortens the total bonding time and facilitates the manual work of orthodontists.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39095872</pmid><doi>10.1111/jerd.13282</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5591-805X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1496-4155 |
| ispartof | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry, 2024-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1477-1484 |
| issn | 1496-4155 1708-8240 1708-8240 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3087563466 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
| subjects | Adolescent application phase bond failures Canine teeth chair time saving Dental Bonding - methods dentistry direct bonding Female Humans Incisors Male metal brackets Methods Orthodontic Brackets Orthodontics Premolars Prospective Studies Statistical analysis Time Factors |
| title | A difference in application time between two direct orthodontic bonding methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A06%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20difference%20in%20application%20time%20between%20two%20direct%20orthodontic%20bonding%20methods:%20A%20prospective%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20esthetic%20and%20restorative%20dentistry&rft.au=Mitic,%20Vladimir&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1477&rft.epage=1484&rft.pages=1477-1484&rft.issn=1496-4155&rft.eissn=1708-8240&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jerd.13282&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3114482343%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2462-a4cf2b230c68d8ca160286ed90108a3647dbcab580f2e060e25d787010a86bdb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3114482343&rft_id=info:pmid/39095872&rfr_iscdi=true |