Loading…
Transformation: From (Trans-)Gender Roles to Profiles
Combining a philosophical approach with empirical psychology, this essay investigates the relationship between “profilicity,” the formation of identity in orientation to profiles, and gender identity. We discuss empirical research that indicates a significant difference between transgender identity...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Linacre quarterly 2024-08, Vol.91 (3), p.278-295 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Combining a philosophical approach with empirical psychology, this essay investigates the relationship between “profilicity,” the formation of identity in orientation to profiles, and gender identity. We discuss empirical research that indicates a significant difference between transgender identity in traditional (collectivist) and modern (individualist) societies. We suggest that this difference is due to a shift in the formation of gender identity away from gender roles and toward gender profiles. To substantiate this claim, we first outline a basic theoretical terminology of identity and gender. Then, we critically analyze the representation of gender, including transgender, in contemporary popular culture. Finally—with a descriptive, but not therapeutic intention—we discuss several case studies of identity formation of transgender people. We conclude that theoretical problems arising from historical shifts in gender identity formation, including transgender identity formation, are best conceptualized in terms of profilicity rather than in the still prevailing semantics of authenticity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0024-3639 2050-8549 |
DOI: | 10.1177/00243639231184041 |