Effects of Thermocycling with Two Different Curing Techniques on Enamel Micro-Cracks Formation, Debonding, and Failure Modes of Ceramic Brackets: An In Vitro Study

• Published in: Materials 2024-08, Vol.17 (15), p.3765
• Main Authors: Qali, Mohammad, Alsulaimani, Lujain, Alamer, Nora, Alghamdi, Faisal, Alhazmi, Anwar, Masoud, Ahmad
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adhesives; Analysis; Bond strength; Bonding agents; Brackets; Cement; Ceramic bonding; Ceramics; Curing; Curing agents; Debonding; Dental enamel; Dental materials; Etching; Ethics; Failure modes; Incidence; Interfaces; Methods; Microcracks; Orthodontics; Patient compliance; Patient satisfaction; Reagents; Sample size; Software; Teeth; Thermal cycling; Variance analysis
• ISSN: 1996-1944; 1996-1944
• DOI: 10.3390/ma17153765

Despite the rise in popularity of ceramic braces for adults, the risk of enamel microcracks (EMCs) upon removal remains a significant drawback for both dental professionals and patients. Our study aimed to assess the effects of thermocycling, pre-curing, and co-curing techniques with different bonding agents on the enamel surface of teeth after the removal of ceramic brackets. We also examined the incidence, quantity, length, and direction of EMCs on tooth surfaces. Additionally, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores and orthodontic bracket bond failure modes were evaluated and compared. The study divided 40 extracted upper canine teeth into ten groups for further analysis. Two groups had intact enamel as the negative control, while the remaining groups had orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded using different bonding agents and curing techniques. Thermocycling was performed in five groups, and ARI was assessed after debonding. The study findings were statistically significant ( < 0.05) in demonstrating the impact of curing techniques on EMCs and debonding outcomes. Seventh-generation bonding agents resulted in complete adhesive removal (ARI = 0). The microcracks' incidence, number, and length showed insignificant results. Differences in ARI between thermocycler and non-thermocycler samples were insignificant. Both co-curing and pre-curing techniques yielded comparable ARI results. This study highlights the importance of using advanced bonding agents to minimize enamel damage during ceramic bracket debonding.