Loading…

Glycemic variability in chronic calcific pancreatitis with diabetes mellitus and its possible determinants

To study glycemic patterns and variability in patients with pancreatic diabetes or type 3c Diabetes mellitus (DM) due to chronic pancreatitis and its subtypes and assess the role of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in modulating glycemic variability. Patients having type 3c DM due to chro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes & metabolic syndrome clinical research & reviews 2024-08, Vol.18 (8), p.103100, Article 103100
Main Authors: Chowdhury, Amarta Shankar, Palui, Rajan, Pramanik, Subhodip, Mondal, Sunetra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To study glycemic patterns and variability in patients with pancreatic diabetes or type 3c Diabetes mellitus (DM) due to chronic pancreatitis and its subtypes and assess the role of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in modulating glycemic variability. Patients having type 3c DM due to chronic pancreatitis, and on insulin underwent Flash continuous-glucose-monitoring (CGM) for 14 days. Parameters were compared between patients with fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes (FCPD) and non-FCPD-chronic calcific pancreatitis (non-FCPD) and between the recipients and non-recipients of pancreatic enzyme-replacement-therapy (ERT). Out of 54 patients with pancreatic diabetes, 35 patients had chronic calcific pancreatitis. They underwent CGM, median HbA1c 9.20 % (77 mmol/mol) and mean Time-In-Range (TIR) being 41.21 % (23.48). Only 5 (15.2 %) patients achieved target TIR>70 % while 16 (48.5 %) patients had high glycemic-variability [Coefficient-of-variation (CV) > 36 %]. Patients with FCPD (n = 14) had higher hypoglycemia-indices like Time-Below-Range (18.92 % vs 8.20 %; p = 0.03) and Low-Blood-Glucose-Index (18.14 % vs 6.04 %; p = 0.02) compared to non-FCPD (n = 21). HbA1c% and hyperglycemic excursions were similar in both groups. Recipients of ERT (n = 20) had lower glycemic-variability [Standard Deviation (SD) 52.15 % vs 68.14 % and CV 32.59 % vs 41.79 %, p 
ISSN:1871-4021
1878-0334
1878-0334
DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103100