Loading…

Multiplanar reconstructions of the thoracic spine in a photon counting dual-source CT scanner: comparison to EID-CT

Background Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is a groundbreaking technology with promising results for visualization of small bone structures. Purpose To analyze the delineation of the thoracic spine in multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) on PCD-CT compared to energy-integrating de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta radiologica (1987) 2024-09, Vol.65 (9), p.1087-1093
Main Authors: Bette, Stefanie J, Braun, Franziska M, Luitjens, Jan H, Kaufmann, David, Decker, Josua, Becker, Judith, Scheurig-Muenkler, Christian, Kroencke, Thomas J, Schwarz, Florian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is a groundbreaking technology with promising results for visualization of small bone structures. Purpose To analyze the delineation of the thoracic spine in multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) on PCD-CT compared to energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT. Material and Methods Two euthanized mice were examined using different scanners: (i) 20-slice EID-CT and (ii) dual-source PCD-CT at various CTDIVol values. Readers evaluated the thoracic spine and selected series with best visualization among signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)-matched pairs. Results SNR was significantly higher in PCD-CT reconstructions (Br68) and lower in Hr98 reconstructions compared to EID-CT. Bone detail visualization was superior in PCD-CT (especially in Hr98 reconstructions) compared to EID-CT. Conclusion MPR on a PCD-CT had a higher SNR and better bone detail visualization even at lower radiation doses compared to EID-CT. PCD-CT with bone reconstructions showed the best delineation of small bone structures and might be considered in clinical routine.
ISSN:0284-1851
1600-0455
1600-0455
DOI:10.1177/02841851241271109