Spines and Inclines: Bioinspired Spines on an Insect-Scale Robot Facilitate Locomotion on Rough and Inclined Terrain

• Published in: Integrative and comparative biology 2024-11, Vol.64 (5), p.1371-1389
• Main Authors: Hernandez, Alyssa M, Schiebel, Perrin E, Shum, Jennifer, Wood, Robert J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Biomechanical Phenomena; Coleoptera - anatomy & histology; Coleoptera - physiology; Extremities - anatomy & histology; Extremities - physiology; Locomotion - physiology; Robotics
• ISSN: 1540-7063; 1557-7023; 1557-7023
• DOI: 10.1093/icb/icae145

Synopsis To navigate complex terrains, insects use diverse tarsal structures (adhesive pads, claws, spines) to reliably attach to and locomote across substrates. This includes surfaces of variable roughness and inclination, which often require reliable transitions from ambulatory to scansorial locomotion. Using bioinspired physical models as a means for comparative research, our study specifically focused on the diversity of tarsal spines, which facilitate locomotion via frictional engagement and shear force generation. For spine designs, we took inspiration from ground beetles (family: Carabidae), which is a largely terrestrial group known for their quick locomotion. Evaluating four different species, we found that the hind legs host linear rows of rigid spines along the entire tarsus. By taking morphometric measurements of the spines, we highlighted parameters of interest (e.g., spine angle and aspect ratio) in order to test their relationship to shear forces sustained during terrain interactions. We systematically evaluated these parameters using spines cut from stainless steel shim attached to a small acrylic sled loaded with various weights. The sled was placed on 3D-printed models of rough terrain, randomly generated using fractal Brownian motion, while a motorized pulley system applied force to the spines. A force sensor measured the reaction force on the terrain, recording shear force before failure occurred. Initial shear tests highlighted the importance of spine angle, with bioinspired anisotropic designs producing higher shear forces. Using these data, we placed the best (50° angle) and worst (90° angle) performing spines on the legs of our insect-scale ambulatory robot physical model. We then tested the robot on various surfaces at 0°, 10°, and 20° inclines, seeing similar success with the more bioinspired spines.