Loading…

Improved detection of small pulmonary embolism on unenhanced computed tomography using an artificial intelligence-based algorithm – a single centre retrospective study

To preliminarily verify the feasibility of a deep-learning (DL) artificial intelligence (AI) model to localize pulmonary embolism (PE) on unenhanced chest-CT by comparison with pulmonary artery (PA) CT angiography (CTA). In a monocentric study, we retrospectively reviewed 99 oncological patients (me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 2024-11, Vol.40 (11), p.2293-2304
Main Authors: Hagen, Florian, Vorberg, Linda, Thamm, Florian, Ditt, Hendrik, Maier, Andreas, Brendel, Jan Michael, Ghibes, Patrick, Bongers, Malte Niklas, Krumm, Patrick, Nikolaou, Konstantin, Horger, Marius
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To preliminarily verify the feasibility of a deep-learning (DL) artificial intelligence (AI) model to localize pulmonary embolism (PE) on unenhanced chest-CT by comparison with pulmonary artery (PA) CT angiography (CTA). In a monocentric study, we retrospectively reviewed 99 oncological patients (median age in years: 64 (range: 28–92 years); percentage of female: 39.4%) who received unenhanced and contrast-enhanced chest CT examinations in one session between January 2020 and October 2022 and who were diagnosed incidentally with PE. Findings in the unenhanced images were correlated with the contrast-enhanced images, which were considered the gold standard for central, segmental and subsegmental PE. The new algorithm was trained and tested based on the 99 unenhanced chest-CT image data sets. Based on them, candidate boxes, which were output by the model, were post-processed by evaluating whether the predicted box intersects with the patient’s lung segmentation at any position. The AI-based algorithm proved to have an overall sensitivity of 54.5% for central, of 81.9% for segmental and 80.0% for subsegmental PE if taking n  = 20 candidate boxes into account. Depending on the localization of the pulmonary embolism, the detection rate for only one box was: 18.1% central, 34.7% segmental and 0.0% subsegmental. The median volume of the clots differed significantly between the three subgroups and was 846.5 mm 3 (IQR:591.1-964.8) in central, 201.3 mm 3 (IQR:98.3-390.9) in segmental and 110.6 mm 3 (IQR:94.3–128.0) in subsegmental PA ( p  
ISSN:1875-8312
1569-5794
1875-8312
1573-0743
DOI:10.1007/s10554-024-03222-8