Safety and efficacy of autologous blood tattooing for preoperative colonic localization: a comparative study with conventional India ink tattooing

• Published in: Techniques in coloproctology 2024-12, Vol.28 (1), p.117, Article 117
• Main Authors: Kim, Hyeon Kyeong, Kim, Ho Seung, Nam, Jin Hoon, Oh, Bo-Young, Chung, Soon Sup, Lee, Ryung-Ah, Noh, Gyoung Tae
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Aged; Blood groups; Blood Transfusion, Autologous - methods; Carbon; Colonic Neoplasms - surgery; Colonoscopy - adverse effects; Colonoscopy - methods; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal Surgery; Coloring Agents; Endoscopy; Female; Gastroenterology; Humans; Length of stay; Localization; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Original Article; Perioperative care; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control; Postoperative period; Preoperative Care - methods; Proctology; Retrospective Studies; Surgery; Surgical site infections; Tattooing - adverse effects; Tattooing - methods; Tattoos; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1123-6337; 1128-045X; 1128-045X
• DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02992-6

Background India ink has been a popular choice for a tattooing agent in preoperative endoscopic localization but often results in unfavorable effects. Subsequently, autologous blood tattooing has arisen as an alternative option. Due to the limited availability of comparative studies on the matter, we conducted a study to compare the perioperative outcomes associated with India ink tattooing versus autologous blood tattooing. Methods A total of 96 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgical procedures for left-sided colonic neoplasm following preoperative endoscopic localization were included in the study. These patients were categorized into two groups: 36 patients who received India ink tattooing and 60 patients who underwent autologous blood tattooing. The perioperative outcomes including procedure-related outcomes and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in visibility and spillage of tattooing agent between India ink group and autologous blood group. However, India ink group showed a higher incidence of post-tattooing fever, higher level of postoperative C-reactive protein level, longer time to first flatus, resumption of surgical soft diet, and duration of hospital stay, and a higher occurrence of postoperative complications including ileus and surgical site infection compared with the autologous blood group. In the multivariate analysis, India ink tattooing was significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. In the subgroup analysis involving patients with intraperitoneal spillage, the autologous blood group demonstrated significantly favorable perioperative outcomes compared with India ink group. Conclusions Autologous blood tattooing demonstrated comparable visibility and enhanced safety, establishing it as a potential alternative to India ink for preoperative endoscopic localization.