Loading…
Do crypto investors care about energy use and climate change? Evidence from Ethereum's transition to proof-of-stake
This paper analyses the transition of Ethereum (ETH) from the energy-intensive Proof-of-Work (PoW) to the less energy-intensive Proof-of-Stake (PoS). We analyze returns, volatility, return correlations and volume of ETH, ETC and Bitcoin for all events in the lead-up to the actual change from PoW to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of environmental management 2024-10, Vol.369, p.122299, Article 122299 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This paper analyses the transition of Ethereum (ETH) from the energy-intensive Proof-of-Work (PoW) to the less energy-intensive Proof-of-Stake (PoS). We analyze returns, volatility, return correlations and volume of ETH, ETC and Bitcoin for all events in the lead-up to the actual change from PoW to PoS also labelled “the merge.” The analysis suggests that some investors value the less energy-intensive mining mechanism and invest in ETH. However, since the overall effect is weak, we conclude that despite all the media attention and the stated concerns about the high energy-intensity of Bitcoin and PoW, most investors do not react to the change with an increased investment in Ethereum.
•Financial effects of Ethereum’s transition from energy-intensive Proof-of-Work to less energy-intensive Proof-of-Stake.•Analysis of returns, volatility, return correlations and volume of ETH, ETC and Bitcoin.•We identify no material financial effects for Ethereum, despite global concerns and media focus on Bitcoin's energy use. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-4797 1095-8630 1095-8630 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122299 |