Loading…

Do crypto investors care about energy use and climate change? Evidence from Ethereum's transition to proof-of-stake

This paper analyses the transition of Ethereum (ETH) from the energy-intensive Proof-of-Work (PoW) to the less energy-intensive Proof-of-Stake (PoS). We analyze returns, volatility, return correlations and volume of ETH, ETC and Bitcoin for all events in the lead-up to the actual change from PoW to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental management 2024-10, Vol.369, p.122299, Article 122299
Main Authors: Baur, Dirk G., Karlsen, Jonathan R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper analyses the transition of Ethereum (ETH) from the energy-intensive Proof-of-Work (PoW) to the less energy-intensive Proof-of-Stake (PoS). We analyze returns, volatility, return correlations and volume of ETH, ETC and Bitcoin for all events in the lead-up to the actual change from PoW to PoS also labelled “the merge.” The analysis suggests that some investors value the less energy-intensive mining mechanism and invest in ETH. However, since the overall effect is weak, we conclude that despite all the media attention and the stated concerns about the high energy-intensity of Bitcoin and PoW, most investors do not react to the change with an increased investment in Ethereum. •Financial effects of Ethereum’s transition from energy-intensive Proof-of-Work to less energy-intensive Proof-of-Stake.•Analysis of returns, volatility, return correlations and volume of ETH, ETC and Bitcoin.•We identify no material financial effects for Ethereum, despite global concerns and media focus on Bitcoin's energy use.
ISSN:0301-4797
1095-8630
1095-8630
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122299