"Because that is the right thing to do": A focus group study of Australian expert perspectives on offering smoking cessation support in lung cancer screening

• Published in: Nicotine & tobacco research 2024-09
• Main Authors: Harrison, Nathan J, Dodd, Rachael H, Sharman, Ashleigh R, Marshall, Henry M, Stone, Emily, Rhee, Joel J, Yap, Mei Ling, McCullough, Sue, Paul, Christine, Bowden, Jacqueline A, Bonevski, Billie, Rankin, Nicole M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1469-994X; 1469-994X
• DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae215

Lung cancer screening (LCS) trials, targeting people with smoking history, have demonstrated reduced mortality. How to optimally embed evidence-based smoking cessation support in LCS, including in Australia, needs to be better understood. We sought experts' perspectives to identify potential barriers and effective implementation strategies. Perceptions of providing smoking cessation support in LCS were elicited in 24 focus groups and three individual interviews with clinicians, cancer screening program managers/policymakers, and researchers during 2021. We conducted framework analysis and mapped key topics to the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Experts (N=84 participants) strongly supported capitalising on an "opportune time" for smoking cessation and new LCS participant contact opportunities throughout the screening and assessment pathway. Many advocated for adapting existing cessation resources to the LCS setting and providing support without participant costs. Experts generally considered referral alone to established programs (e.g., telephone Quitline) as insufficient, but likely helpful in follow-up, and dedicated cessation specialist roles as essential. Broader cessation messaging (via mass media/community channels) was also suggested to reinforce individualised support. Experts described inherent alignment, and an ethical responsibility, to deliver smoking cessation as a core LCS component. It was suggested that LCS-eligible participants' varied experiences of stigma, health literacy, and motivation, be considered in cessation supports. Primary care support and individualised interventions were suggested to facilitate implementation. Experts considered smoking cessation support essential in LCS. The expert-identified and multi-level implementation strategies described here can directly inform smoking cessation-specific planning for Australia's forthcoming National LCS Program. The international literature includes few examples considering how best to provide smoking cessation support within a lung cancer screening (LCS) program in advance of program commencement. Our analysis, using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, is one of the first to explore experts' perspectives within this context. Experts identified multiple implementation barriers to providing smoking cessation support within and outside of an Australian LCS program, including key work infrastructure barriers, and advocated for provi