Loading…

Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake

Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake. A query...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical lung cancer 2024-11, Vol.25 (7), p.619-623
Main Authors: Park, Ju Ae, Yalamanchili, Sriya, Brown, Zeliene, Myers, Andrew, Weyant, Michael J., Mahajan, Amit K., Connolly, Christopher Patrick, Suzuki, Kei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1528-22c10994a9cf9f1ccb2eda94e82b479f73ad32418e4e6bf7b03276dd1e1facda3
container_end_page 623
container_issue 7
container_start_page 619
container_title Clinical lung cancer
container_volume 25
creator Park, Ju Ae
Yalamanchili, Sriya
Brown, Zeliene
Myers, Andrew
Weyant, Michael J.
Mahajan, Amit K.
Connolly, Christopher Patrick
Suzuki, Kei
description Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake. A query of current and former smokers identified 62,630 patients aged 50 and above in the primary care setting between January 1, 2021 and May 5, 2022. We randomly reviewed 3704 charts for LCS eligibility and recorded who received LCS in the form of low-dose computed tomography amongst the eligible patients. We collected demographic information including gender, race, primary language, ethnicity, zip code, and insurance. Data analysis was performed utilizing 2-proportional z tests. We identified 461 patients who were LCS eligible. Our overall LCS uptake was 19.9% (92/461). Three-time frames were analyzed: (1) prior to EMR alert implementation, (2) after implementation of EMR alert (January 7, 2021), and (3) after implementation of EMR alert and order set (March 3, 2021). Screening uptake was significantly improved with initiation of EMR alert (1/46 [2.2%] to 23/109 [21.1%]; P = .003). LCS uptake remained similarly high after subsequent order set implementation (23/109 [21.1%] and 68/306 [22.2%]; P = .72). Amongst the different demographics, age was significantly associated with screening uptake, with age ≥65 demonstrating statistically significant increased rates of screening (15.6% [41/263] for
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3102070617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1525730424001578</els_id><sourcerecordid>3102070617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1528-22c10994a9cf9f1ccb2eda94e82b479f73ad32418e4e6bf7b03276dd1e1facda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr3DAURkVoyav9A10ELbuxo4fHtiCbMOQxMKHQNGshX10FTWV5InkK-ffVMEmWWV3xce7H1SHkB2c1Z7y93NQQAtSCiaZmfc2YOCKnXMm-Yq1iX8p7IRZVJ1lzQs5y3hSglVwckxOpRLNoeX9K_GrcBhwxzmb2U6SToybSm4Awpyl6oA9oPZhAfyNMydLrgGmmj_45elfyOIdXuoqQ0GTMdL2Lz3RpImCijyXE6EvwtJ3NX_xGvjoTMn5_m-fk6fbmz_K-Wv-6Wy2v1xWUc_tKCOBMqcYocMpxgEGgNarBXgxNp1wnjZWi4T022A6uG5gUXWstR-4MWCPPyc9D7zZNLzvMsx59BgzBRJx2WUvOBOtYy7uCigMKaco5odPb5EeTXjVneq9Yb_Resd4r1qzXxWBZunjr3w0j2o-Vd6cFuDoAWH75z2PSGTwWJ9anolXbyX_W_x8Ewo4Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3102070617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Park, Ju Ae ; Yalamanchili, Sriya ; Brown, Zeliene ; Myers, Andrew ; Weyant, Michael J. ; Mahajan, Amit K. ; Connolly, Christopher Patrick ; Suzuki, Kei</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Ju Ae ; Yalamanchili, Sriya ; Brown, Zeliene ; Myers, Andrew ; Weyant, Michael J. ; Mahajan, Amit K. ; Connolly, Christopher Patrick ; Suzuki, Kei</creatorcontrib><description>Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake. A query of current and former smokers identified 62,630 patients aged 50 and above in the primary care setting between January 1, 2021 and May 5, 2022. We randomly reviewed 3704 charts for LCS eligibility and recorded who received LCS in the form of low-dose computed tomography amongst the eligible patients. We collected demographic information including gender, race, primary language, ethnicity, zip code, and insurance. Data analysis was performed utilizing 2-proportional z tests. We identified 461 patients who were LCS eligible. Our overall LCS uptake was 19.9% (92/461). Three-time frames were analyzed: (1) prior to EMR alert implementation, (2) after implementation of EMR alert (January 7, 2021), and (3) after implementation of EMR alert and order set (March 3, 2021). Screening uptake was significantly improved with initiation of EMR alert (1/46 [2.2%] to 23/109 [21.1%]; P = .003). LCS uptake remained similarly high after subsequent order set implementation (23/109 [21.1%] and 68/306 [22.2%]; P = .72). Amongst the different demographics, age was significantly associated with screening uptake, with age ≥65 demonstrating statistically significant increased rates of screening (15.6% [41/263] for &lt;65 vs 25.8% [51/198] for ≥65; P = .007). Implementation of EMR alerts significantly improves LCS uptake in the primary care setting. Such efforts should be considered in other hospital settings to improve LCS uptake. Low uptake remains a significant issue in lung cancer screening. To possibly overcome physician awareness, our hospital implemented an electronic medical record alert system that prompts the primary care physicians about screen-eligible patients. We demonstrate that implementation of such alert significantly improves lung cancer screening uptake.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-7304</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-0690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-0690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39245618</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Electronic Health Records - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Electronic medical record notification ; Female ; Humans ; Improving cancer screening ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Middle Aged ; Primary Health Care ; Provider gap ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Clinical lung cancer, 2024-11, Vol.25 (7), p.619-623</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1528-22c10994a9cf9f1ccb2eda94e82b479f73ad32418e4e6bf7b03276dd1e1facda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39245618$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Ju Ae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yalamanchili, Sriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Zeliene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weyant, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Amit K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Christopher Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kei</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake</title><title>Clinical lung cancer</title><addtitle>Clin Lung Cancer</addtitle><description>Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake. A query of current and former smokers identified 62,630 patients aged 50 and above in the primary care setting between January 1, 2021 and May 5, 2022. We randomly reviewed 3704 charts for LCS eligibility and recorded who received LCS in the form of low-dose computed tomography amongst the eligible patients. We collected demographic information including gender, race, primary language, ethnicity, zip code, and insurance. Data analysis was performed utilizing 2-proportional z tests. We identified 461 patients who were LCS eligible. Our overall LCS uptake was 19.9% (92/461). Three-time frames were analyzed: (1) prior to EMR alert implementation, (2) after implementation of EMR alert (January 7, 2021), and (3) after implementation of EMR alert and order set (March 3, 2021). Screening uptake was significantly improved with initiation of EMR alert (1/46 [2.2%] to 23/109 [21.1%]; P = .003). LCS uptake remained similarly high after subsequent order set implementation (23/109 [21.1%] and 68/306 [22.2%]; P = .72). Amongst the different demographics, age was significantly associated with screening uptake, with age ≥65 demonstrating statistically significant increased rates of screening (15.6% [41/263] for &lt;65 vs 25.8% [51/198] for ≥65; P = .007). Implementation of EMR alerts significantly improves LCS uptake in the primary care setting. Such efforts should be considered in other hospital settings to improve LCS uptake. Low uptake remains a significant issue in lung cancer screening. To possibly overcome physician awareness, our hospital implemented an electronic medical record alert system that prompts the primary care physicians about screen-eligible patients. We demonstrate that implementation of such alert significantly improves lung cancer screening uptake.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Electronic medical record notification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Improving cancer screening</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Provider gap</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>1525-7304</issn><issn>1938-0690</issn><issn>1938-0690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtr3DAURkVoyav9A10ELbuxo4fHtiCbMOQxMKHQNGshX10FTWV5InkK-ffVMEmWWV3xce7H1SHkB2c1Z7y93NQQAtSCiaZmfc2YOCKnXMm-Yq1iX8p7IRZVJ1lzQs5y3hSglVwckxOpRLNoeX9K_GrcBhwxzmb2U6SToybSm4Awpyl6oA9oPZhAfyNMydLrgGmmj_45elfyOIdXuoqQ0GTMdL2Lz3RpImCijyXE6EvwtJ3NX_xGvjoTMn5_m-fk6fbmz_K-Wv-6Wy2v1xWUc_tKCOBMqcYocMpxgEGgNarBXgxNp1wnjZWi4T022A6uG5gUXWstR-4MWCPPyc9D7zZNLzvMsx59BgzBRJx2WUvOBOtYy7uCigMKaco5odPb5EeTXjVneq9Yb_Resd4r1qzXxWBZunjr3w0j2o-Vd6cFuDoAWH75z2PSGTwWJ9anolXbyX_W_x8Ewo4Z</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Park, Ju Ae</creator><creator>Yalamanchili, Sriya</creator><creator>Brown, Zeliene</creator><creator>Myers, Andrew</creator><creator>Weyant, Michael J.</creator><creator>Mahajan, Amit K.</creator><creator>Connolly, Christopher Patrick</creator><creator>Suzuki, Kei</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake</title><author>Park, Ju Ae ; Yalamanchili, Sriya ; Brown, Zeliene ; Myers, Andrew ; Weyant, Michael J. ; Mahajan, Amit K. ; Connolly, Christopher Patrick ; Suzuki, Kei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1528-22c10994a9cf9f1ccb2eda94e82b479f73ad32418e4e6bf7b03276dd1e1facda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Electronic medical record notification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Improving cancer screening</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Provider gap</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Ju Ae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yalamanchili, Sriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Zeliene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weyant, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Amit K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Christopher Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical lung cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Ju Ae</au><au>Yalamanchili, Sriya</au><au>Brown, Zeliene</au><au>Myers, Andrew</au><au>Weyant, Michael J.</au><au>Mahajan, Amit K.</au><au>Connolly, Christopher Patrick</au><au>Suzuki, Kei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake</atitle><jtitle>Clinical lung cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Lung Cancer</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>623</epage><pages>619-623</pages><issn>1525-7304</issn><issn>1938-0690</issn><eissn>1938-0690</eissn><abstract>Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake. A query of current and former smokers identified 62,630 patients aged 50 and above in the primary care setting between January 1, 2021 and May 5, 2022. We randomly reviewed 3704 charts for LCS eligibility and recorded who received LCS in the form of low-dose computed tomography amongst the eligible patients. We collected demographic information including gender, race, primary language, ethnicity, zip code, and insurance. Data analysis was performed utilizing 2-proportional z tests. We identified 461 patients who were LCS eligible. Our overall LCS uptake was 19.9% (92/461). Three-time frames were analyzed: (1) prior to EMR alert implementation, (2) after implementation of EMR alert (January 7, 2021), and (3) after implementation of EMR alert and order set (March 3, 2021). Screening uptake was significantly improved with initiation of EMR alert (1/46 [2.2%] to 23/109 [21.1%]; P = .003). LCS uptake remained similarly high after subsequent order set implementation (23/109 [21.1%] and 68/306 [22.2%]; P = .72). Amongst the different demographics, age was significantly associated with screening uptake, with age ≥65 demonstrating statistically significant increased rates of screening (15.6% [41/263] for &lt;65 vs 25.8% [51/198] for ≥65; P = .007). Implementation of EMR alerts significantly improves LCS uptake in the primary care setting. Such efforts should be considered in other hospital settings to improve LCS uptake. Low uptake remains a significant issue in lung cancer screening. To possibly overcome physician awareness, our hospital implemented an electronic medical record alert system that prompts the primary care physicians about screen-eligible patients. We demonstrate that implementation of such alert significantly improves lung cancer screening uptake.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39245618</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-7304
ispartof Clinical lung cancer, 2024-11, Vol.25 (7), p.619-623
issn 1525-7304
1938-0690
1938-0690
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3102070617
source Elsevier
subjects Aged
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Electronic Health Records - statistics & numerical data
Electronic medical record notification
Female
Humans
Improving cancer screening
Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis
Male
Mass Screening - methods
Middle Aged
Primary Health Care
Provider gap
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T05%3A12%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20an%20Electronic%20Medical%20Record%20Alert%20Significantly%20Increases%20Lung%20Cancer%20Screening%20Uptake&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20lung%20cancer&rft.au=Park,%20Ju%20Ae&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=623&rft.pages=619-623&rft.issn=1525-7304&rft.eissn=1938-0690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3102070617%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1528-22c10994a9cf9f1ccb2eda94e82b479f73ad32418e4e6bf7b03276dd1e1facda3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3102070617&rft_id=info:pmid/39245618&rfr_iscdi=true