Loading…
Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake
Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake. A query...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical lung cancer 2024-11, Vol.25 (7), p.619-623 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1528-22c10994a9cf9f1ccb2eda94e82b479f73ad32418e4e6bf7b03276dd1e1facda3 |
container_end_page | 623 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 619 |
container_title | Clinical lung cancer |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Park, Ju Ae Yalamanchili, Sriya Brown, Zeliene Myers, Andrew Weyant, Michael J. Mahajan, Amit K. Connolly, Christopher Patrick Suzuki, Kei |
description | Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake.
A query of current and former smokers identified 62,630 patients aged 50 and above in the primary care setting between January 1, 2021 and May 5, 2022. We randomly reviewed 3704 charts for LCS eligibility and recorded who received LCS in the form of low-dose computed tomography amongst the eligible patients. We collected demographic information including gender, race, primary language, ethnicity, zip code, and insurance. Data analysis was performed utilizing 2-proportional z tests.
We identified 461 patients who were LCS eligible. Our overall LCS uptake was 19.9% (92/461). Three-time frames were analyzed: (1) prior to EMR alert implementation, (2) after implementation of EMR alert (January 7, 2021), and (3) after implementation of EMR alert and order set (March 3, 2021). Screening uptake was significantly improved with initiation of EMR alert (1/46 [2.2%] to 23/109 [21.1%]; P = .003). LCS uptake remained similarly high after subsequent order set implementation (23/109 [21.1%] and 68/306 [22.2%]; P = .72). Amongst the different demographics, age was significantly associated with screening uptake, with age ≥65 demonstrating statistically significant increased rates of screening (15.6% [41/263] for |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3102070617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1525730424001578</els_id><sourcerecordid>3102070617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1528-22c10994a9cf9f1ccb2eda94e82b479f73ad32418e4e6bf7b03276dd1e1facda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr3DAURkVoyav9A10ELbuxo4fHtiCbMOQxMKHQNGshX10FTWV5InkK-ffVMEmWWV3xce7H1SHkB2c1Z7y93NQQAtSCiaZmfc2YOCKnXMm-Yq1iX8p7IRZVJ1lzQs5y3hSglVwckxOpRLNoeX9K_GrcBhwxzmb2U6SToybSm4Awpyl6oA9oPZhAfyNMydLrgGmmj_45elfyOIdXuoqQ0GTMdL2Lz3RpImCijyXE6EvwtJ3NX_xGvjoTMn5_m-fk6fbmz_K-Wv-6Wy2v1xWUc_tKCOBMqcYocMpxgEGgNarBXgxNp1wnjZWi4T022A6uG5gUXWstR-4MWCPPyc9D7zZNLzvMsx59BgzBRJx2WUvOBOtYy7uCigMKaco5odPb5EeTXjVneq9Yb_Resd4r1qzXxWBZunjr3w0j2o-Vd6cFuDoAWH75z2PSGTwWJ9anolXbyX_W_x8Ewo4Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3102070617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Park, Ju Ae ; Yalamanchili, Sriya ; Brown, Zeliene ; Myers, Andrew ; Weyant, Michael J. ; Mahajan, Amit K. ; Connolly, Christopher Patrick ; Suzuki, Kei</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Ju Ae ; Yalamanchili, Sriya ; Brown, Zeliene ; Myers, Andrew ; Weyant, Michael J. ; Mahajan, Amit K. ; Connolly, Christopher Patrick ; Suzuki, Kei</creatorcontrib><description>Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake.
A query of current and former smokers identified 62,630 patients aged 50 and above in the primary care setting between January 1, 2021 and May 5, 2022. We randomly reviewed 3704 charts for LCS eligibility and recorded who received LCS in the form of low-dose computed tomography amongst the eligible patients. We collected demographic information including gender, race, primary language, ethnicity, zip code, and insurance. Data analysis was performed utilizing 2-proportional z tests.
We identified 461 patients who were LCS eligible. Our overall LCS uptake was 19.9% (92/461). Three-time frames were analyzed: (1) prior to EMR alert implementation, (2) after implementation of EMR alert (January 7, 2021), and (3) after implementation of EMR alert and order set (March 3, 2021). Screening uptake was significantly improved with initiation of EMR alert (1/46 [2.2%] to 23/109 [21.1%]; P = .003). LCS uptake remained similarly high after subsequent order set implementation (23/109 [21.1%] and 68/306 [22.2%]; P = .72). Amongst the different demographics, age was significantly associated with screening uptake, with age ≥65 demonstrating statistically significant increased rates of screening (15.6% [41/263] for <65 vs 25.8% [51/198] for ≥65; P = .007).
Implementation of EMR alerts significantly improves LCS uptake in the primary care setting. Such efforts should be considered in other hospital settings to improve LCS uptake.
Low uptake remains a significant issue in lung cancer screening. To possibly overcome physician awareness, our hospital implemented an electronic medical record alert system that prompts the primary care physicians about screen-eligible patients. We demonstrate that implementation of such alert significantly improves lung cancer screening uptake.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-7304</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-0690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-0690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39245618</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Electronic Health Records - statistics & numerical data ; Electronic medical record notification ; Female ; Humans ; Improving cancer screening ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Middle Aged ; Primary Health Care ; Provider gap ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Clinical lung cancer, 2024-11, Vol.25 (7), p.619-623</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1528-22c10994a9cf9f1ccb2eda94e82b479f73ad32418e4e6bf7b03276dd1e1facda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39245618$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Ju Ae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yalamanchili, Sriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Zeliene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weyant, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Amit K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Christopher Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kei</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake</title><title>Clinical lung cancer</title><addtitle>Clin Lung Cancer</addtitle><description>Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake.
A query of current and former smokers identified 62,630 patients aged 50 and above in the primary care setting between January 1, 2021 and May 5, 2022. We randomly reviewed 3704 charts for LCS eligibility and recorded who received LCS in the form of low-dose computed tomography amongst the eligible patients. We collected demographic information including gender, race, primary language, ethnicity, zip code, and insurance. Data analysis was performed utilizing 2-proportional z tests.
We identified 461 patients who were LCS eligible. Our overall LCS uptake was 19.9% (92/461). Three-time frames were analyzed: (1) prior to EMR alert implementation, (2) after implementation of EMR alert (January 7, 2021), and (3) after implementation of EMR alert and order set (March 3, 2021). Screening uptake was significantly improved with initiation of EMR alert (1/46 [2.2%] to 23/109 [21.1%]; P = .003). LCS uptake remained similarly high after subsequent order set implementation (23/109 [21.1%] and 68/306 [22.2%]; P = .72). Amongst the different demographics, age was significantly associated with screening uptake, with age ≥65 demonstrating statistically significant increased rates of screening (15.6% [41/263] for <65 vs 25.8% [51/198] for ≥65; P = .007).
Implementation of EMR alerts significantly improves LCS uptake in the primary care setting. Such efforts should be considered in other hospital settings to improve LCS uptake.
Low uptake remains a significant issue in lung cancer screening. To possibly overcome physician awareness, our hospital implemented an electronic medical record alert system that prompts the primary care physicians about screen-eligible patients. We demonstrate that implementation of such alert significantly improves lung cancer screening uptake.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Electronic medical record notification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Improving cancer screening</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Provider gap</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>1525-7304</issn><issn>1938-0690</issn><issn>1938-0690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtr3DAURkVoyav9A10ELbuxo4fHtiCbMOQxMKHQNGshX10FTWV5InkK-ffVMEmWWV3xce7H1SHkB2c1Z7y93NQQAtSCiaZmfc2YOCKnXMm-Yq1iX8p7IRZVJ1lzQs5y3hSglVwckxOpRLNoeX9K_GrcBhwxzmb2U6SToybSm4Awpyl6oA9oPZhAfyNMydLrgGmmj_45elfyOIdXuoqQ0GTMdL2Lz3RpImCijyXE6EvwtJ3NX_xGvjoTMn5_m-fk6fbmz_K-Wv-6Wy2v1xWUc_tKCOBMqcYocMpxgEGgNarBXgxNp1wnjZWi4T022A6uG5gUXWstR-4MWCPPyc9D7zZNLzvMsx59BgzBRJx2WUvOBOtYy7uCigMKaco5odPb5EeTXjVneq9Yb_Resd4r1qzXxWBZunjr3w0j2o-Vd6cFuDoAWH75z2PSGTwWJ9anolXbyX_W_x8Ewo4Z</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Park, Ju Ae</creator><creator>Yalamanchili, Sriya</creator><creator>Brown, Zeliene</creator><creator>Myers, Andrew</creator><creator>Weyant, Michael J.</creator><creator>Mahajan, Amit K.</creator><creator>Connolly, Christopher Patrick</creator><creator>Suzuki, Kei</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake</title><author>Park, Ju Ae ; Yalamanchili, Sriya ; Brown, Zeliene ; Myers, Andrew ; Weyant, Michael J. ; Mahajan, Amit K. ; Connolly, Christopher Patrick ; Suzuki, Kei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1528-22c10994a9cf9f1ccb2eda94e82b479f73ad32418e4e6bf7b03276dd1e1facda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Electronic medical record notification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Improving cancer screening</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Provider gap</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Ju Ae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yalamanchili, Sriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Zeliene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weyant, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Amit K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Christopher Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical lung cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Ju Ae</au><au>Yalamanchili, Sriya</au><au>Brown, Zeliene</au><au>Myers, Andrew</au><au>Weyant, Michael J.</au><au>Mahajan, Amit K.</au><au>Connolly, Christopher Patrick</au><au>Suzuki, Kei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake</atitle><jtitle>Clinical lung cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Lung Cancer</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>623</epage><pages>619-623</pages><issn>1525-7304</issn><issn>1938-0690</issn><eissn>1938-0690</eissn><abstract>Lung cancer survival is significantly improved with early detection. However, lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains low despite national recommendations. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) alert and order set would increase LCS uptake.
A query of current and former smokers identified 62,630 patients aged 50 and above in the primary care setting between January 1, 2021 and May 5, 2022. We randomly reviewed 3704 charts for LCS eligibility and recorded who received LCS in the form of low-dose computed tomography amongst the eligible patients. We collected demographic information including gender, race, primary language, ethnicity, zip code, and insurance. Data analysis was performed utilizing 2-proportional z tests.
We identified 461 patients who were LCS eligible. Our overall LCS uptake was 19.9% (92/461). Three-time frames were analyzed: (1) prior to EMR alert implementation, (2) after implementation of EMR alert (January 7, 2021), and (3) after implementation of EMR alert and order set (March 3, 2021). Screening uptake was significantly improved with initiation of EMR alert (1/46 [2.2%] to 23/109 [21.1%]; P = .003). LCS uptake remained similarly high after subsequent order set implementation (23/109 [21.1%] and 68/306 [22.2%]; P = .72). Amongst the different demographics, age was significantly associated with screening uptake, with age ≥65 demonstrating statistically significant increased rates of screening (15.6% [41/263] for <65 vs 25.8% [51/198] for ≥65; P = .007).
Implementation of EMR alerts significantly improves LCS uptake in the primary care setting. Such efforts should be considered in other hospital settings to improve LCS uptake.
Low uptake remains a significant issue in lung cancer screening. To possibly overcome physician awareness, our hospital implemented an electronic medical record alert system that prompts the primary care physicians about screen-eligible patients. We demonstrate that implementation of such alert significantly improves lung cancer screening uptake.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39245618</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-7304 |
ispartof | Clinical lung cancer, 2024-11, Vol.25 (7), p.619-623 |
issn | 1525-7304 1938-0690 1938-0690 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3102070617 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Aged Early Detection of Cancer - methods Electronic Health Records - statistics & numerical data Electronic medical record notification Female Humans Improving cancer screening Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis Male Mass Screening - methods Middle Aged Primary Health Care Provider gap Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record Alert Significantly Increases Lung Cancer Screening Uptake |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T05%3A12%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20an%20Electronic%20Medical%20Record%20Alert%20Significantly%20Increases%20Lung%20Cancer%20Screening%20Uptake&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20lung%20cancer&rft.au=Park,%20Ju%20Ae&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=623&rft.pages=619-623&rft.issn=1525-7304&rft.eissn=1938-0690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3102070617%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1528-22c10994a9cf9f1ccb2eda94e82b479f73ad32418e4e6bf7b03276dd1e1facda3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3102070617&rft_id=info:pmid/39245618&rfr_iscdi=true |