Assessment of functional and radiological outcomes of suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches of tibial nailing in patients with tibial shaft fracture: A randomized control study

The study aimed to assess functional and radiological outcomes of the suprapatellar approach (SPA) and infrapatellar approaches (IPA) of tibial nailing in patients with closed tibia shaft fractures. After Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) and Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI) approval, pati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 2024-08, Vol.55, p.102515, Article 102515
Main Authors: Panda, Soyam S., Jain, Mantu, Patro, Bishnu P., Patra, Saroj K., Pradhan, Siddharth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Infrapatellar approach
Suprapatellar approach
Tibia nailing
Tibia shaft fracture
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-de3eae5b6acc7079f2f7b48a22750d24361f152d994a99ca0ff56f444870a0543
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102515
container_title Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
container_volume 55
creator Panda, Soyam S.
Jain, Mantu
Patro, Bishnu P.
Patra, Saroj K.
Pradhan, Siddharth
description The study aimed to assess functional and radiological outcomes of the suprapatellar approach (SPA) and infrapatellar approaches (IPA) of tibial nailing in patients with closed tibia shaft fractures. After Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) and Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI) approval, patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture type 42 were enrolled from August 2021 and August 2022 at a level I trauma centre and randomized to SPA and IPA with informed consent. Demographics, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical grading, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operative duration, bleeding, postoperative radiographic alignment, and union were compared among both approaches. Functional parameters like Lysholm knee score, Anterior knee pain (AKP), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score upon kneeling, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), KOOS Patellofemoral score (KOOS PF), EuroQol (EQ5D5L), Forgotten joint score (FJS), Range of motion (ROM) of knee and any complications were assessed at 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively. Per protocol analysis of 50 patients (25 SPA, 25 IPA) done at the end of the study. SPA group had significantly lesser fluoroscopy time (91.28 ± 12.40s vs. 105.36 ± 9.23s, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102515
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3102882157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S097656622400184X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3102882157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-de3eae5b6acc7079f2f7b48a22750d24361f152d994a99ca0ff56f444870a0543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxn0A0ar0BTggH7nsYjuxkyAuq4p_UiUucLa89rjrVWIH2wGV9-L9mJAWccIXSzO_-UbffIS84GzPGVevz_uzTXUvmGixICSXT8glGzq1k0qJC3Jdypnhk4oPvH9GLppByE4JeUl-HUqBUiaIlSZP_RJtDSmakZroaDYupDHdBYuFtFSbJigrV5Y5m9lUGEeT_6Ah-n8r85yTsaeNruEYUCCaMIZ4hyhFMODKQn-Eenrsl5PxlaKMrUuGN_SA-6NLU_gJjtoUa04I1cXdPydPvRkLXD_8V-Tr-3dfbj7ubj9_-HRzuN1ZLoXcOWjAgDwqY23HusEL3x3b3gjRSeZE2yjuEXTD0JphsIZ5L5Vv27bvmGGyba7Iq00X3XxboFQ9hWJXixHSUnSD1-57wWWHqNhQm1MpGbyec5hMvtec6TUlfdZrSnpNSW8p4dDLB_3lOIH7O_KYDwJvNwDQ5fcAWReLh7PgQgZbtUvhf_q_AZmMqds</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3102882157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of functional and radiological outcomes of suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches of tibial nailing in patients with tibial shaft fracture: A randomized control study</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Panda, Soyam S. ; Jain, Mantu ; Patro, Bishnu P. ; Patra, Saroj K. ; Pradhan, Siddharth</creator><creatorcontrib>Panda, Soyam S. ; Jain, Mantu ; Patro, Bishnu P. ; Patra, Saroj K. ; Pradhan, Siddharth</creatorcontrib><description>The study aimed to assess functional and radiological outcomes of the suprapatellar approach (SPA) and infrapatellar approaches (IPA) of tibial nailing in patients with closed tibia shaft fractures. After Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) and Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI) approval, patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture type 42 were enrolled from August 2021 and August 2022 at a level I trauma centre and randomized to SPA and IPA with informed consent. Demographics, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical grading, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operative duration, bleeding, postoperative radiographic alignment, and union were compared among both approaches. Functional parameters like Lysholm knee score, Anterior knee pain (AKP), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score upon kneeling, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), KOOS Patellofemoral score (KOOS PF), EuroQol (EQ5D5L), Forgotten joint score (FJS), Range of motion (ROM) of knee and any complications were assessed at 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively. Per protocol analysis of 50 patients (25 SPA, 25 IPA) done at the end of the study. SPA group had significantly lesser fluoroscopy time (91.28 ± 12.40s vs. 105.36 ± 9.23s, p &lt; 0.001) and operative duration (mins) (123.80 ± 24.25 vs. 130.00 ± 18.20, p &lt; 0.001) than IPA. No significant differences were noted in Lysholm knee score at three months (p = 0.094), six months (p = 0.406), and 12 months (p = 0.071). The SPA group showed significantly lower VAS Score upon kneeling at six months (p &lt; 0.0001). Similarly, KOOS (p &lt; 0.001), KOOS PF (p = 0.01), and EQ 5D5L (p = 0.03) were significantly better in the SPA group at six months postoperatively. Lower Coronal translation was found in SPA [0 (0–1.8) vs. 1.4 (0.9–1.8), p = 0.010]. Whereas, IPA had higher range of flexion at 3 months [130.0 (129.0–135.0) vs 123.1 (120.0–130.5), p = 0.047]. However, no significant differences were noted in blood loss, AKP, FJS, EQ-VAS, coronal angulation, sagittal malalignment, time to union, return to work and postoperative complications among the groups. SPA has lesser surgery time, more straightforward anatomic fracture reduction, better fracture alignment, lesser radiation exposure for both patients and surgeons, quicker recovery time, and promotes early kneeling activities with similar long-term functional outcomes and union rates, and can be considered in routine clinical practice than conventional IPA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0976-5662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102515</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39257625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Infrapatellar approach ; Suprapatellar approach ; Tibia nailing ; Tibia shaft fracture</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024-08, Vol.55, p.102515, Article 102515</ispartof><rights>2024 Delhi Orthopedic Association</rights><rights>2024 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-de3eae5b6acc7079f2f7b48a22750d24361f152d994a99ca0ff56f444870a0543</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3848-4277 ; 0000-0002-8513-7895 ; 0000-0002-8662-3625</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39257625$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panda, Soyam S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Mantu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patro, Bishnu P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patra, Saroj K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, Siddharth</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of functional and radiological outcomes of suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches of tibial nailing in patients with tibial shaft fracture: A randomized control study</title><title>Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma</title><addtitle>J Clin Orthop Trauma</addtitle><description>The study aimed to assess functional and radiological outcomes of the suprapatellar approach (SPA) and infrapatellar approaches (IPA) of tibial nailing in patients with closed tibia shaft fractures. After Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) and Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI) approval, patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture type 42 were enrolled from August 2021 and August 2022 at a level I trauma centre and randomized to SPA and IPA with informed consent. Demographics, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical grading, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operative duration, bleeding, postoperative radiographic alignment, and union were compared among both approaches. Functional parameters like Lysholm knee score, Anterior knee pain (AKP), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score upon kneeling, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), KOOS Patellofemoral score (KOOS PF), EuroQol (EQ5D5L), Forgotten joint score (FJS), Range of motion (ROM) of knee and any complications were assessed at 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively. Per protocol analysis of 50 patients (25 SPA, 25 IPA) done at the end of the study. SPA group had significantly lesser fluoroscopy time (91.28 ± 12.40s vs. 105.36 ± 9.23s, p &lt; 0.001) and operative duration (mins) (123.80 ± 24.25 vs. 130.00 ± 18.20, p &lt; 0.001) than IPA. No significant differences were noted in Lysholm knee score at three months (p = 0.094), six months (p = 0.406), and 12 months (p = 0.071). The SPA group showed significantly lower VAS Score upon kneeling at six months (p &lt; 0.0001). Similarly, KOOS (p &lt; 0.001), KOOS PF (p = 0.01), and EQ 5D5L (p = 0.03) were significantly better in the SPA group at six months postoperatively. Lower Coronal translation was found in SPA [0 (0–1.8) vs. 1.4 (0.9–1.8), p = 0.010]. Whereas, IPA had higher range of flexion at 3 months [130.0 (129.0–135.0) vs 123.1 (120.0–130.5), p = 0.047]. However, no significant differences were noted in blood loss, AKP, FJS, EQ-VAS, coronal angulation, sagittal malalignment, time to union, return to work and postoperative complications among the groups. SPA has lesser surgery time, more straightforward anatomic fracture reduction, better fracture alignment, lesser radiation exposure for both patients and surgeons, quicker recovery time, and promotes early kneeling activities with similar long-term functional outcomes and union rates, and can be considered in routine clinical practice than conventional IPA.</description><subject>Infrapatellar approach</subject><subject>Suprapatellar approach</subject><subject>Tibia nailing</subject><subject>Tibia shaft fracture</subject><issn>0976-5662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxn0A0ar0BTggH7nsYjuxkyAuq4p_UiUucLa89rjrVWIH2wGV9-L9mJAWccIXSzO_-UbffIS84GzPGVevz_uzTXUvmGixICSXT8glGzq1k0qJC3Jdypnhk4oPvH9GLppByE4JeUl-HUqBUiaIlSZP_RJtDSmakZroaDYupDHdBYuFtFSbJigrV5Y5m9lUGEeT_6Ah-n8r85yTsaeNruEYUCCaMIZ4hyhFMODKQn-Eenrsl5PxlaKMrUuGN_SA-6NLU_gJjtoUa04I1cXdPydPvRkLXD_8V-Tr-3dfbj7ubj9_-HRzuN1ZLoXcOWjAgDwqY23HusEL3x3b3gjRSeZE2yjuEXTD0JphsIZ5L5Vv27bvmGGyba7Iq00X3XxboFQ9hWJXixHSUnSD1-57wWWHqNhQm1MpGbyec5hMvtec6TUlfdZrSnpNSW8p4dDLB_3lOIH7O_KYDwJvNwDQ5fcAWReLh7PgQgZbtUvhf_q_AZmMqds</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Panda, Soyam S.</creator><creator>Jain, Mantu</creator><creator>Patro, Bishnu P.</creator><creator>Patra, Saroj K.</creator><creator>Pradhan, Siddharth</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3848-4277</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8513-7895</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8662-3625</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Assessment of functional and radiological outcomes of suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches of tibial nailing in patients with tibial shaft fracture: A randomized control study</title><author>Panda, Soyam S. ; Jain, Mantu ; Patro, Bishnu P. ; Patra, Saroj K. ; Pradhan, Siddharth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-de3eae5b6acc7079f2f7b48a22750d24361f152d994a99ca0ff56f444870a0543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Infrapatellar approach</topic><topic>Suprapatellar approach</topic><topic>Tibia nailing</topic><topic>Tibia shaft fracture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panda, Soyam S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Mantu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patro, Bishnu P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patra, Saroj K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, Siddharth</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panda, Soyam S.</au><au>Jain, Mantu</au><au>Patro, Bishnu P.</au><au>Patra, Saroj K.</au><au>Pradhan, Siddharth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of functional and radiological outcomes of suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches of tibial nailing in patients with tibial shaft fracture: A randomized control study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Orthop Trauma</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>55</volume><spage>102515</spage><pages>102515-</pages><artnum>102515</artnum><issn>0976-5662</issn><abstract>The study aimed to assess functional and radiological outcomes of the suprapatellar approach (SPA) and infrapatellar approaches (IPA) of tibial nailing in patients with closed tibia shaft fractures. After Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) and Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI) approval, patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture type 42 were enrolled from August 2021 and August 2022 at a level I trauma centre and randomized to SPA and IPA with informed consent. Demographics, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical grading, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operative duration, bleeding, postoperative radiographic alignment, and union were compared among both approaches. Functional parameters like Lysholm knee score, Anterior knee pain (AKP), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score upon kneeling, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), KOOS Patellofemoral score (KOOS PF), EuroQol (EQ5D5L), Forgotten joint score (FJS), Range of motion (ROM) of knee and any complications were assessed at 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively. Per protocol analysis of 50 patients (25 SPA, 25 IPA) done at the end of the study. SPA group had significantly lesser fluoroscopy time (91.28 ± 12.40s vs. 105.36 ± 9.23s, p &lt; 0.001) and operative duration (mins) (123.80 ± 24.25 vs. 130.00 ± 18.20, p &lt; 0.001) than IPA. No significant differences were noted in Lysholm knee score at three months (p = 0.094), six months (p = 0.406), and 12 months (p = 0.071). The SPA group showed significantly lower VAS Score upon kneeling at six months (p &lt; 0.0001). Similarly, KOOS (p &lt; 0.001), KOOS PF (p = 0.01), and EQ 5D5L (p = 0.03) were significantly better in the SPA group at six months postoperatively. Lower Coronal translation was found in SPA [0 (0–1.8) vs. 1.4 (0.9–1.8), p = 0.010]. Whereas, IPA had higher range of flexion at 3 months [130.0 (129.0–135.0) vs 123.1 (120.0–130.5), p = 0.047]. However, no significant differences were noted in blood loss, AKP, FJS, EQ-VAS, coronal angulation, sagittal malalignment, time to union, return to work and postoperative complications among the groups. SPA has lesser surgery time, more straightforward anatomic fracture reduction, better fracture alignment, lesser radiation exposure for both patients and surgeons, quicker recovery time, and promotes early kneeling activities with similar long-term functional outcomes and union rates, and can be considered in routine clinical practice than conventional IPA.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39257625</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102515</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3848-4277</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8513-7895</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8662-3625</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0976-5662
ispartof Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024-08, Vol.55, p.102515, Article 102515
issn 0976-5662
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3102882157
source Elsevier
subjects Infrapatellar approach
Suprapatellar approach
Tibia nailing
Tibia shaft fracture
title Assessment of functional and radiological outcomes of suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches of tibial nailing in patients with tibial shaft fracture: A randomized control study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A50%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20functional%20and%20radiological%20outcomes%20of%20suprapatellar%20and%20infrapatellar%20approaches%20of%20tibial%20nailing%20in%20patients%20with%20tibial%20shaft%20fracture:%20A%20randomized%20control%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20trauma&rft.au=Panda,%20Soyam%20S.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=55&rft.spage=102515&rft.pages=102515-&rft.artnum=102515&rft.issn=0976-5662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102515&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3102882157%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1525-de3eae5b6acc7079f2f7b48a22750d24361f152d994a99ca0ff56f444870a0543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3102882157&rft_id=info:pmid/39257625&rfr_iscdi=true