Efficacy of hydrodistension for frozen shoulder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to provide comprehensive and reliable evidence for the treatment of pain and motor function in patients with frozen shoulder (FS) with hydrodistension. The research including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for FS that compared hydrodistension with routine treatments to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2024-05, Vol.103 (22), p.e38388
Main Authors: Chen, Tianpeng, Li, Wei, Zhong, Yong, Chen, Tianle, Shi, Xiaolin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bursitis - therapy
Humans
Pain Measurement
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Treatment Outcome
Water
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to provide comprehensive and reliable evidence for the treatment of pain and motor function in patients with frozen shoulder (FS) with hydrodistension. The research including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for FS that compared hydrodistension with routine treatments to controls was searched and screened in the PubMed, Library of congress, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, China Science and Technology Journal Database. Constant-Murley score (CMS) for shoulder function and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain must be assessed. RevMan 5.3 software was used to evaluate the bias and quality of the included studies. We found that analgesic effects (MD: -1.07; 95% CI: -1.94 to -0.20; P 
ISSN:0025-7974
1536-5964
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000038388