Dentin Bonding Durability of Four Different Recently Introduced Self-Etch Adhesives

• Published in: Materials 2024-08, Vol.17 (17), p.4296
• Main Authors: Kitahara, Sayaka, Shimizu, Shojiro, Takagaki, Tomohiro, Inokoshi, Masanao, Abdou, Ahmed, Burrow, Michael F, Nikaido, Toru
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adhesive bonding; Adhesives; Bond strength; Bonding strength; Composite materials; Curing; Degree of polymerization; Dentin; Durability; Light emitting diodes; Mechanical properties; Polymerization; Thermal cycling; Thermal stress; Variance analysis; Water storage
• ISSN: 1996-1944; 1996-1944
• DOI: 10.3390/ma17174296

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the bonding durability of four different self-etch adhesives to dentin after 24 h and thermal cycling (TC) and to measure the degree of polymerization conversion (DC) in situ. Two-step self-etch adhesives, Clearfil SE Bond 2 (SE2, Kuraray Noritake Dental) and G2-Bond Universal (G2B, GC), and one-step self-etch adhesives, Scotchbond™ Universal Plus Adhesive (SBU, 3M ESPE) and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (UBQ, Kuraray Noritake Dental), were used. The labial surfaces of bovine teeth were ground to create flat dentin surfaces. The adhesives were applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. After resin composite buildup and 24 h water storage, the specimens were sectioned into beams and all groups were subjected to thermal stress for 0, 10,000 (10k), or 20,000 (20k) cycles followed by micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) testing. In situ DC was investigated with a laser Raman microscope. The µTBS data were statistically analyzed and subjected to a Weibull analysis. The different groups were compared at the characteristic strength (63.2% probability of failure) (α = 0.05). Two-Way ANOVA was used to show the effect of different adhesives and thermal cycling on the mean DC% followed by Tukey's multiple comparison post hoc test. G2B/TC10k resulted in a significant increase in the µTBS compared to TC0. SBU/TC20k showed significantly higher µTBS compared to TC0. For comparison between different tested adhesives, SBU showed a significantly lower µTBS compared to G2B after TC10k. G2B and SBU showed a greater number of adhesive failures after TC. Mean DC% was different for each adhesive. The newly developed MDP- and HEMA-free 2-SEA showed similar bonding performance with the gold-standard 2-SEA. However, there is still room for further improvement in terms of SEAs.