Loading…
Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics combined with 3D deep transfer learning to predict cervical stromal invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma
To develop and compare various preoperative cervical stromal invasion (CSI) prediction models, including radiomics, three-dimensional (3D) deep transfer learning (DTL), and integrated models, using single-sequence and multiparametric MRI. Data from 466 early-stage endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients...
Saved in:
Published in: | Abdominal radiology (New York) 2024-09 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To develop and compare various preoperative cervical stromal invasion (CSI) prediction models, including radiomics, three-dimensional (3D) deep transfer learning (DTL), and integrated models, using single-sequence and multiparametric MRI.
Data from 466 early-stage endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients from three centers were collected. Radiomics models were constructed based on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI), and four combined sequences as well as 3D DTL models. Two integrated models were created using ensemble and stacking algorithms based on optimal radiomics and DTL models. Model performance and clinical benefits were assessed using area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination index (IDI), and the Delong test for model comparisons.
Multiparametric MRI models were superior to single-sequence models for radiomics or DTL models. Ensemble and stacking integrated models displayed excellent performance. The stacking model had the highest average AUC (0.908) and accuracy (0.883) in external validation groups 1 and 2 (AUC = 0.965 and 0.851, respectively) and emerged as the best predictive model for CSI. All models significantly outperformed the radiologist (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2366-0058 2366-0058 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00261-024-04577-1 |