Loading…
Principal component analysis biplot visualization of electromyogram features for submaximal muscle strength grading
Submaximal muscle strength grading is clinically significant to monitor the progress of rehabilitation. Especially muscle strength grading of core back muscles is challenging using the conventional manual muscle testing (MMT) methods. The muscles are crucial to recovery from back pain, spinal cord i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Computers in biology and medicine 2024-11, Vol.182, p.109142, Article 109142 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1922-c959e8e1342cd0648f422aa4723d6d999de7dcbeeb7aea12c3d62b2b628d30303 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 109142 |
container_title | Computers in biology and medicine |
container_volume | 182 |
creator | Saranya, S. Poonguzhali, S. |
description | Submaximal muscle strength grading is clinically significant to monitor the progress of rehabilitation. Especially muscle strength grading of core back muscles is challenging using the conventional manual muscle testing (MMT) methods. The muscles are crucial to recovery from back pain, spinal cord injury, stroke and other related diseases. The subjective nature of MMT, adds more ambiguity to grade fine progressions in submaximal strength levels involving 4-, 4 and 4+ grades. Electromyogram (EMG) has been widely used as a quantitative measure to provide insight into the progress of muscle strength. However, several EMG features have been reported in previous studies, and the selection of suitable features pertaining to the problem has remained a challenge.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) biplot visualization is employed in this study to select EMG features that highlight fine changes in muscle strength spanning the submaximal range. Features that offer maximum loading in the principal component subspace, as observed in the PCA biplot, are selected for grading submaximal strength.
The performance of the proposed feature set is compared with conventional Principal Component (PC) scores. Submaximal muscle strength grades of 4-, 4, 4+ or 5 are assigned using K-means and Gaussian mixture model clustering methods. Clustering performance of the two feature selection methods is compared using the silhouette score metric.
The proposed feature set from biplot visualization involving Root Mean Square (RMS) EMG and Waveform Length in combination with Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) clustering method was observed to offer maximum accuracy. Muscle-wise mean Silhouette Index (SI) scores (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109142 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3105491381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010482524012277</els_id><sourcerecordid>3105491381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1922-c959e8e1342cd0648f422aa4723d6d999de7dcbeeb7aea12c3d62b2b628d30303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6FyTgxUuPSSX9kaMufsGCHvQc0kn1mCGdtEn34vjrzTC7CF48FVQ99Rb1voRQzvac8e7NcW_TvIw-zej2wEDWtuISHpEdH3rVsFbIx2THGGeNHKC9Is9KOTLGJBPsKbkSCvqBd7Aj5Wv20frFBHqWTBHjSk004VR8oaNfQlrpnS-bCf63WX2KNE0UA9o1p_mUDtnMdEKzbhkLnVKmZRtn88vPVXHeig1Iy5oxHtYftMLOx8Nz8mQyoeCL-3pNvn94_-3mU3P75ePnm7e3jeUKoLGqVTggFxKsY50cJglgjOxBuM4ppRz2zo6IY2_QcLC1DSOMHQxO1D_FNXl90V1y-rlhWfXsi8UQTMS0FS04a6XiYuAVffUPekxbrjacKWiV6jkTlRoulM2plIyTXnJ9NJ80Z_ocjD7qv8HoczD6EkxdfXl_oNpTZw-LD0lU4N0FwOrIncesi_UYLTqfq9naJf__K38AO3emlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125997103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Principal component analysis biplot visualization of electromyogram features for submaximal muscle strength grading</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Saranya, S. ; Poonguzhali, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saranya, S. ; Poonguzhali, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Submaximal muscle strength grading is clinically significant to monitor the progress of rehabilitation. Especially muscle strength grading of core back muscles is challenging using the conventional manual muscle testing (MMT) methods. The muscles are crucial to recovery from back pain, spinal cord injury, stroke and other related diseases. The subjective nature of MMT, adds more ambiguity to grade fine progressions in submaximal strength levels involving 4-, 4 and 4+ grades. Electromyogram (EMG) has been widely used as a quantitative measure to provide insight into the progress of muscle strength. However, several EMG features have been reported in previous studies, and the selection of suitable features pertaining to the problem has remained a challenge.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) biplot visualization is employed in this study to select EMG features that highlight fine changes in muscle strength spanning the submaximal range. Features that offer maximum loading in the principal component subspace, as observed in the PCA biplot, are selected for grading submaximal strength.
The performance of the proposed feature set is compared with conventional Principal Component (PC) scores. Submaximal muscle strength grades of 4-, 4, 4+ or 5 are assigned using K-means and Gaussian mixture model clustering methods. Clustering performance of the two feature selection methods is compared using the silhouette score metric.
The proposed feature set from biplot visualization involving Root Mean Square (RMS) EMG and Waveform Length in combination with Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) clustering method was observed to offer maximum accuracy. Muscle-wise mean Silhouette Index (SI) scores (p < 0.05) of .81, .74 (Longissimus thoracis left, right) and .73, .77 (Iliocostalis lumborum left, right) were observed. Similarly grade wise mean SI scores (p < 0.05) of .80, .76, .73, and .981 for grades 4-, 4, 4+, and 5 respectively, were observed.
The study addresses the problem of selecting minimum features that offer maximum variability for EMG assisted submaximal muscle strength grading. The proposed method emphasizes using biplot visualization to overcome the difficulty in choosing appropriate EMG features of the core back muscles that significantly distinguishes between grades 4-, 4, 4+ and 5.
[Display omitted]
•Submaximal muscle strength grading is crucial for recovery during rehabilitation.•Selection of significantly contributing EMG features improves grading accuracy.•PCA biplots enable visualization of original feature contribution in PC space.•Strength of bilateral Erector Spinae muscles are best adjudged using PCA biplot visualization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4825</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-0534</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109142</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39278162</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adult ; Artificial intelligence ; Back injuries ; Back pain ; Classification ; Clustering ; Electromyogram ; Electromyography ; Electromyography - methods ; Female ; Gaussian mixture model ; Humans ; Injury analysis ; K-means ; Male ; Medical research ; Methods ; Muscle strength ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology ; Muscles ; PCA biplots ; Principal Component Analysis ; Principal components analysis ; Probabilistic models ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Spinal cord injuries ; Sports training ; Strength training ; Submaximal muscle strength ; Visualization ; Waveforms</subject><ispartof>Computers in biology and medicine, 2024-11, Vol.182, p.109142, Article 109142</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1922-c959e8e1342cd0648f422aa4723d6d999de7dcbeeb7aea12c3d62b2b628d30303</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2154-2944</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39278162$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saranya, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poonguzhali, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Principal component analysis biplot visualization of electromyogram features for submaximal muscle strength grading</title><title>Computers in biology and medicine</title><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><description>Submaximal muscle strength grading is clinically significant to monitor the progress of rehabilitation. Especially muscle strength grading of core back muscles is challenging using the conventional manual muscle testing (MMT) methods. The muscles are crucial to recovery from back pain, spinal cord injury, stroke and other related diseases. The subjective nature of MMT, adds more ambiguity to grade fine progressions in submaximal strength levels involving 4-, 4 and 4+ grades. Electromyogram (EMG) has been widely used as a quantitative measure to provide insight into the progress of muscle strength. However, several EMG features have been reported in previous studies, and the selection of suitable features pertaining to the problem has remained a challenge.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) biplot visualization is employed in this study to select EMG features that highlight fine changes in muscle strength spanning the submaximal range. Features that offer maximum loading in the principal component subspace, as observed in the PCA biplot, are selected for grading submaximal strength.
The performance of the proposed feature set is compared with conventional Principal Component (PC) scores. Submaximal muscle strength grades of 4-, 4, 4+ or 5 are assigned using K-means and Gaussian mixture model clustering methods. Clustering performance of the two feature selection methods is compared using the silhouette score metric.
The proposed feature set from biplot visualization involving Root Mean Square (RMS) EMG and Waveform Length in combination with Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) clustering method was observed to offer maximum accuracy. Muscle-wise mean Silhouette Index (SI) scores (p < 0.05) of .81, .74 (Longissimus thoracis left, right) and .73, .77 (Iliocostalis lumborum left, right) were observed. Similarly grade wise mean SI scores (p < 0.05) of .80, .76, .73, and .981 for grades 4-, 4, 4+, and 5 respectively, were observed.
The study addresses the problem of selecting minimum features that offer maximum variability for EMG assisted submaximal muscle strength grading. The proposed method emphasizes using biplot visualization to overcome the difficulty in choosing appropriate EMG features of the core back muscles that significantly distinguishes between grades 4-, 4, 4+ and 5.
[Display omitted]
•Submaximal muscle strength grading is crucial for recovery during rehabilitation.•Selection of significantly contributing EMG features improves grading accuracy.•PCA biplots enable visualization of original feature contribution in PC space.•Strength of bilateral Erector Spinae muscles are best adjudged using PCA biplot visualization.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Back injuries</subject><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Electromyogram</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gaussian mixture model</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury analysis</subject><subject>K-means</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Muscle strength</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>PCA biplots</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Probabilistic models</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><subject>Submaximal muscle strength</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><issn>0010-4825</issn><issn>1879-0534</issn><issn>1879-0534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6FyTgxUuPSSX9kaMufsGCHvQc0kn1mCGdtEn34vjrzTC7CF48FVQ99Rb1voRQzvac8e7NcW_TvIw-zej2wEDWtuISHpEdH3rVsFbIx2THGGeNHKC9Is9KOTLGJBPsKbkSCvqBd7Aj5Wv20frFBHqWTBHjSk004VR8oaNfQlrpnS-bCf63WX2KNE0UA9o1p_mUDtnMdEKzbhkLnVKmZRtn88vPVXHeig1Iy5oxHtYftMLOx8Nz8mQyoeCL-3pNvn94_-3mU3P75ePnm7e3jeUKoLGqVTggFxKsY50cJglgjOxBuM4ppRz2zo6IY2_QcLC1DSOMHQxO1D_FNXl90V1y-rlhWfXsi8UQTMS0FS04a6XiYuAVffUPekxbrjacKWiV6jkTlRoulM2plIyTXnJ9NJ80Z_ocjD7qv8HoczD6EkxdfXl_oNpTZw-LD0lU4N0FwOrIncesi_UYLTqfq9naJf__K38AO3emlA</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Saranya, S.</creator><creator>Poonguzhali, S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-2944</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Principal component analysis biplot visualization of electromyogram features for submaximal muscle strength grading</title><author>Saranya, S. ; Poonguzhali, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1922-c959e8e1342cd0648f422aa4723d6d999de7dcbeeb7aea12c3d62b2b628d30303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Back injuries</topic><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Electromyogram</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gaussian mixture model</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury analysis</topic><topic>K-means</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Muscle strength</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>PCA biplots</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Probabilistic models</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><topic>Submaximal muscle strength</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saranya, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poonguzhali, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saranya, S.</au><au>Poonguzhali, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Principal component analysis biplot visualization of electromyogram features for submaximal muscle strength grading</atitle><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>182</volume><spage>109142</spage><pages>109142-</pages><artnum>109142</artnum><issn>0010-4825</issn><issn>1879-0534</issn><eissn>1879-0534</eissn><abstract>Submaximal muscle strength grading is clinically significant to monitor the progress of rehabilitation. Especially muscle strength grading of core back muscles is challenging using the conventional manual muscle testing (MMT) methods. The muscles are crucial to recovery from back pain, spinal cord injury, stroke and other related diseases. The subjective nature of MMT, adds more ambiguity to grade fine progressions in submaximal strength levels involving 4-, 4 and 4+ grades. Electromyogram (EMG) has been widely used as a quantitative measure to provide insight into the progress of muscle strength. However, several EMG features have been reported in previous studies, and the selection of suitable features pertaining to the problem has remained a challenge.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) biplot visualization is employed in this study to select EMG features that highlight fine changes in muscle strength spanning the submaximal range. Features that offer maximum loading in the principal component subspace, as observed in the PCA biplot, are selected for grading submaximal strength.
The performance of the proposed feature set is compared with conventional Principal Component (PC) scores. Submaximal muscle strength grades of 4-, 4, 4+ or 5 are assigned using K-means and Gaussian mixture model clustering methods. Clustering performance of the two feature selection methods is compared using the silhouette score metric.
The proposed feature set from biplot visualization involving Root Mean Square (RMS) EMG and Waveform Length in combination with Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) clustering method was observed to offer maximum accuracy. Muscle-wise mean Silhouette Index (SI) scores (p < 0.05) of .81, .74 (Longissimus thoracis left, right) and .73, .77 (Iliocostalis lumborum left, right) were observed. Similarly grade wise mean SI scores (p < 0.05) of .80, .76, .73, and .981 for grades 4-, 4, 4+, and 5 respectively, were observed.
The study addresses the problem of selecting minimum features that offer maximum variability for EMG assisted submaximal muscle strength grading. The proposed method emphasizes using biplot visualization to overcome the difficulty in choosing appropriate EMG features of the core back muscles that significantly distinguishes between grades 4-, 4, 4+ and 5.
[Display omitted]
•Submaximal muscle strength grading is crucial for recovery during rehabilitation.•Selection of significantly contributing EMG features improves grading accuracy.•PCA biplots enable visualization of original feature contribution in PC space.•Strength of bilateral Erector Spinae muscles are best adjudged using PCA biplot visualization.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39278162</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109142</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-2944</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4825 |
ispartof | Computers in biology and medicine, 2024-11, Vol.182, p.109142, Article 109142 |
issn | 0010-4825 1879-0534 1879-0534 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3105491381 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Accuracy Adult Artificial intelligence Back injuries Back pain Classification Clustering Electromyogram Electromyography Electromyography - methods Female Gaussian mixture model Humans Injury analysis K-means Male Medical research Methods Muscle strength Muscle Strength - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology Muscles PCA biplots Principal Component Analysis Principal components analysis Probabilistic models Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Spinal cord injuries Sports training Strength training Submaximal muscle strength Visualization Waveforms |
title | Principal component analysis biplot visualization of electromyogram features for submaximal muscle strength grading |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T05%3A36%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Principal%20component%20analysis%20biplot%20visualization%20of%20electromyogram%20features%20for%20submaximal%20muscle%20strength%20grading&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Saranya,%20S.&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=182&rft.spage=109142&rft.pages=109142-&rft.artnum=109142&rft.issn=0010-4825&rft.eissn=1879-0534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109142&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3105491381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1922-c959e8e1342cd0648f422aa4723d6d999de7dcbeeb7aea12c3d62b2b628d30303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125997103&rft_id=info:pmid/39278162&rfr_iscdi=true |