Loading…

A systematic review and meta‐analysis on effect of different exercise training on grip strength and upper extremity muscle strength in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background Individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are prone to musculoskeletal complications, particularly in the upper extremities (UE), which can significantly impair their grip strength and UE muscle strength. This review will provide valuable insights for developing optimized exercise...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy 2024-10, Vol.29 (4), p.e2130-n/a
Main Authors: Boora, Mamta, Malik, Manoj, Kaur, Jaspreet
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are prone to musculoskeletal complications, particularly in the upper extremities (UE), which can significantly impair their grip strength and UE muscle strength. This review will provide valuable insights for developing optimized exercise interventions aimed at enhancing upper limb functionality and improving patient outcomes. Aim To determine the effect of different exercise training on grip strength & UE muscle strength in patients suffering from T2DM. Methodology A comprehensive search from electronic databases was performed based on the selection criteria and 13 randomized controlled trials (RCT's) were included in the study. Mean changes in grip strength and UE muscle strength were the primary outcome measures. Included studies ranked high on the PEDro rating scale and eta‐analysis was performed by Rev Man 5.4 software. Results Meta‐analysis results indicated that there was a statistically significant improvement in UE muscle strength of experimental group when compared to control group (mean differences [MD] = 2.91, 95% confidence interval = 0.12, 5.71; p = 0.04) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 49%, p 
ISSN:1358-2267
1471-2865
1471-2865
DOI:10.1002/pri.2130