Occurrence and fate of five representative neonicotinoid insecticides across different wastewater treatment plants and the impact on receiving water bodies

• Published in: Environmental research 2024-12, Vol.263 (Pt 1), p.120025, Article 120025
• Main Authors: Ke, Yuhan, Zheng, Wanbing, Tian, Di, Ke, Siyu, Fu, Shuna, Zhang, Zhe, Xie, Yue, Zhu, Junyu, Ren, Bangxing, Zhang, Chao, Yi, Xiaohui, Huang, Mingzhi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aeration sludge; Biodegradation, Environmental; Environmental Monitoring; Insecticides - analysis; Neonicotinoid insecticides; Neonicotinoids - analysis; Thiazoles - analysis; Waste Disposal, Fluid; Wastewater - analysis; Wastewater - chemistry; Wastewater treatment plant; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
• ISSN: 0013-9351; 1096-0953; 1096-0953
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.120025

Neonicotinoids (NEOs), despite their widespread use as insecticides, exhibit a notable knowledge deficit in regards to their presence in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and their surrounding environments. This study delves into the presence and disposition of 5 NEOs: Thiamethoxam (THM), Clothianidin (CLO), Imidacloprid (IMD), Acetamiprid (ACE), and Thiacloprid (THA) across 3 domestic WWTPs and their receiving waters. Notably, THM, CLO, and ACE were consistently detected in all water and sludge samples, with THM emerging as the most abundant compound in both influent and effluent. Among the 3 WWTPs, WWTP 2, employing a fine bubble oxidation process, achieved the highest removal efficiency, surpassing 68%, in contrast to WWTP 1 (CAST) at 37% and WWTP 3 (A/A/O) at 7%. Biodegradation played a pivotal role in NEO removal, accounting for 36.7% and 68.2% of the total removal in WWTP 1 and WWTP 2, respectively. Surprisingly, in WWTP 3, biotransformation process inadvertently increased ACE and CLO concentrations by approximately 4.1% and 4.5%, respectively. The total NEO concentration in the receiving surface waters ranged from 72.7 to 155.5 ng/L, while sediment concentrations were significantly lower, spanning between 0.10 and 1.53 ng/g. WWTPs serve as both a removal and concentration point for NEOs, thereby significantly influencing their transportation. Additionally, the concentration of most NEOs in the receiving waters progressively increased from upstream to downstream, highlighting the substantial impact of WWTP discharges on natural water environments. This research offers valuable insights into NEO pollution surrounding WWTPs in the Pearl River Delta, ultimately aiding in pollution control and environmental protection decisions. •Neonicotinoids levels in water surpass those in sediments.•THM always was the richest neonicotinoid in dewatered sludge.•This study provides the first comparison of neonicotinoid removal in 3 WWTPs.