Loading…

Effects of chickpea grain feeding on the growth and carcass features of growing lambs

An investigation was conducted to find out how diet formulation of chickpea grains (CHPE) rather than soybean meal and barely grain affected the performance, blood metabolites, carcass, and meat quality features of Awassi lambs. Thirty lambs, with an average age of 73 ± 0.85 days and an initial body...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tropical animal health and production 2024-11, Vol.56 (8), p.273, Article 273
Main Authors: Obeidat, Belal S., Shdaifat, Mustafa M., Ata, Mysaa, Obeidat, Mohammed D., Nusairat, Basheer M., Aloueedat, Mohammad K., Al-Khaza’leh, Ja’far, Thomas, Milton G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-e5012dbb47fd3d4884ab79676c5ec1710b1073f1345e4fd4af88a79155dd7c3a3
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 273
container_title Tropical animal health and production
container_volume 56
creator Obeidat, Belal S.
Shdaifat, Mustafa M.
Ata, Mysaa
Obeidat, Mohammed D.
Nusairat, Basheer M.
Aloueedat, Mohammad K.
Al-Khaza’leh, Ja’far
Thomas, Milton G.
description An investigation was conducted to find out how diet formulation of chickpea grains (CHPE) rather than soybean meal and barely grain affected the performance, blood metabolites, carcass, and meat quality features of Awassi lambs. Thirty lambs, with an average age of 73 ± 0.85 days and an initial body weight of 21.0 ± 1.29 kg, were randomly assigned into one of three diets, with 10 lambs per treatment diet. The diets were designed to replace a portion of the barley grain and soybean meal and included no CHPE (CON), 7.5% CHPE (CHPE7.5), and 15% CHPE (CHPE15). Lambs were individually housed, fed every day, and weighed every two weeks to measure performance characteristics over the 60-day study period. Four lambs per treatment were chosen at random on day 42 to participate in an N balance study and assess diet digestibility. All lambs were slaughtered at the termination of the trial period to measure the features of the carcass characteristics and meat quality. As the amount of CHPE included in the diets increased, the cost of diets reduced. As the amount of CHPE in the diets increased, so did the intake of ether extract (EE). The CON group’s cost per kilogram of increase was higher ( P  = 0.017) than that of the CHPE7.5 and CHEP15 groups. The digestibility of EE was higher ( P  = 0.024) in the CHPE15 diet as opposed to the CHPE7.5 and CON diets. The various treatments did not impact blood metabolites, carcass features, or meat quality. Therefore, the present study suggested that chickpeas might be added to the diets of finishing lambs up to 15% of dry matter.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11250-024-04108-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3108762640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3108762640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-e5012dbb47fd3d4884ab79676c5ec1710b1073f1345e4fd4af88a79155dd7c3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotlZfwIUE3LiJJpPbzFJKvUDBjV2HTC7t1OlMTWYQ3960UxVcuDqQ8_3_CR8AlwTfEozlXSQk4xjhjCHMCM6ROAJjwiVFktH8GIwxZgVikskROItxjXGK5eIUjGhBCRUkH4PFzHtnughbD82qMm9bp-Ey6KqB3jlbNUvYNrBbufTYfnQrqBsLjQ5Gx5gI3fXB7cO79Y6u9aaM5-DE6zq6i8OcgMXD7HX6hOYvj8_T-zkyGRcdchyTzJYlk95Sy_Kc6VIWQgrDnSGS4JJgST2hjDvmLdM-z7UsCOfWSkM1nYCboXcb2vfexU5tqmhcXevGtX1UNFmRIhMMJ_T6D7pu-9Ck3-0pxkVW0ERlA2VCG2NwXm1DtdHhUxGsdtLVIF0l6WovXYkUujpU9-XG2Z_It-UE0AGIadUsXfi9_U_tF3e6i3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3108456293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of chickpea grain feeding on the growth and carcass features of growing lambs</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Obeidat, Belal S. ; Shdaifat, Mustafa M. ; Ata, Mysaa ; Obeidat, Mohammed D. ; Nusairat, Basheer M. ; Aloueedat, Mohammad K. ; Al-Khaza’leh, Ja’far ; Thomas, Milton G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Obeidat, Belal S. ; Shdaifat, Mustafa M. ; Ata, Mysaa ; Obeidat, Mohammed D. ; Nusairat, Basheer M. ; Aloueedat, Mohammad K. ; Al-Khaza’leh, Ja’far ; Thomas, Milton G.</creatorcontrib><description>An investigation was conducted to find out how diet formulation of chickpea grains (CHPE) rather than soybean meal and barely grain affected the performance, blood metabolites, carcass, and meat quality features of Awassi lambs. Thirty lambs, with an average age of 73 ± 0.85 days and an initial body weight of 21.0 ± 1.29 kg, were randomly assigned into one of three diets, with 10 lambs per treatment diet. The diets were designed to replace a portion of the barley grain and soybean meal and included no CHPE (CON), 7.5% CHPE (CHPE7.5), and 15% CHPE (CHPE15). Lambs were individually housed, fed every day, and weighed every two weeks to measure performance characteristics over the 60-day study period. Four lambs per treatment were chosen at random on day 42 to participate in an N balance study and assess diet digestibility. All lambs were slaughtered at the termination of the trial period to measure the features of the carcass characteristics and meat quality. As the amount of CHPE included in the diets increased, the cost of diets reduced. As the amount of CHPE in the diets increased, so did the intake of ether extract (EE). The CON group’s cost per kilogram of increase was higher ( P  = 0.017) than that of the CHPE7.5 and CHEP15 groups. The digestibility of EE was higher ( P  = 0.024) in the CHPE15 diet as opposed to the CHPE7.5 and CON diets. The various treatments did not impact blood metabolites, carcass features, or meat quality. Therefore, the present study suggested that chickpeas might be added to the diets of finishing lambs up to 15% of dry matter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4747</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-7438</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11250-024-04108-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39313618</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Animal Feed - analysis ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Blood ; Body weight ; Carcasses ; Chickpeas ; Cicer - chemistry ; Cost analysis ; Diet ; Diet - veterinary ; Digestibility ; Digestion ; Dry matter ; Grain ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Meat ; Meat quality ; Metabolites ; Random Allocation ; Regular Articles ; Sheep, Domestic - growth &amp; development ; Sheep, Domestic - physiology ; Soybeans ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science ; Weight ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Tropical animal health and production, 2024-11, Vol.56 (8), p.273, Article 273</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Nov 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-e5012dbb47fd3d4884ab79676c5ec1710b1073f1345e4fd4af88a79155dd7c3a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0315-4032</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39313618$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Obeidat, Belal S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shdaifat, Mustafa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ata, Mysaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obeidat, Mohammed D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nusairat, Basheer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aloueedat, Mohammad K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Khaza’leh, Ja’far</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Milton G.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of chickpea grain feeding on the growth and carcass features of growing lambs</title><title>Tropical animal health and production</title><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><description>An investigation was conducted to find out how diet formulation of chickpea grains (CHPE) rather than soybean meal and barely grain affected the performance, blood metabolites, carcass, and meat quality features of Awassi lambs. Thirty lambs, with an average age of 73 ± 0.85 days and an initial body weight of 21.0 ± 1.29 kg, were randomly assigned into one of three diets, with 10 lambs per treatment diet. The diets were designed to replace a portion of the barley grain and soybean meal and included no CHPE (CON), 7.5% CHPE (CHPE7.5), and 15% CHPE (CHPE15). Lambs were individually housed, fed every day, and weighed every two weeks to measure performance characteristics over the 60-day study period. Four lambs per treatment were chosen at random on day 42 to participate in an N balance study and assess diet digestibility. All lambs were slaughtered at the termination of the trial period to measure the features of the carcass characteristics and meat quality. As the amount of CHPE included in the diets increased, the cost of diets reduced. As the amount of CHPE in the diets increased, so did the intake of ether extract (EE). The CON group’s cost per kilogram of increase was higher ( P  = 0.017) than that of the CHPE7.5 and CHEP15 groups. The digestibility of EE was higher ( P  = 0.024) in the CHPE15 diet as opposed to the CHPE7.5 and CON diets. The various treatments did not impact blood metabolites, carcass features, or meat quality. Therefore, the present study suggested that chickpeas might be added to the diets of finishing lambs up to 15% of dry matter.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Carcasses</subject><subject>Chickpeas</subject><subject>Cicer - chemistry</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Digestion</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat quality</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Regular Articles</subject><subject>Sheep, Domestic - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Sheep, Domestic - physiology</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0049-4747</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotlZfwIUE3LiJJpPbzFJKvUDBjV2HTC7t1OlMTWYQ3960UxVcuDqQ8_3_CR8AlwTfEozlXSQk4xjhjCHMCM6ROAJjwiVFktH8GIwxZgVikskROItxjXGK5eIUjGhBCRUkH4PFzHtnughbD82qMm9bp-Ey6KqB3jlbNUvYNrBbufTYfnQrqBsLjQ5Gx5gI3fXB7cO79Y6u9aaM5-DE6zq6i8OcgMXD7HX6hOYvj8_T-zkyGRcdchyTzJYlk95Sy_Kc6VIWQgrDnSGS4JJgST2hjDvmLdM-z7UsCOfWSkM1nYCboXcb2vfexU5tqmhcXevGtX1UNFmRIhMMJ_T6D7pu-9Ck3-0pxkVW0ERlA2VCG2NwXm1DtdHhUxGsdtLVIF0l6WovXYkUujpU9-XG2Z_It-UE0AGIadUsXfi9_U_tF3e6i3M</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Obeidat, Belal S.</creator><creator>Shdaifat, Mustafa M.</creator><creator>Ata, Mysaa</creator><creator>Obeidat, Mohammed D.</creator><creator>Nusairat, Basheer M.</creator><creator>Aloueedat, Mohammad K.</creator><creator>Al-Khaza’leh, Ja’far</creator><creator>Thomas, Milton G.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0315-4032</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Effects of chickpea grain feeding on the growth and carcass features of growing lambs</title><author>Obeidat, Belal S. ; Shdaifat, Mustafa M. ; Ata, Mysaa ; Obeidat, Mohammed D. ; Nusairat, Basheer M. ; Aloueedat, Mohammad K. ; Al-Khaza’leh, Ja’far ; Thomas, Milton G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-e5012dbb47fd3d4884ab79676c5ec1710b1073f1345e4fd4af88a79155dd7c3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Carcasses</topic><topic>Chickpeas</topic><topic>Cicer - chemistry</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Digestion</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat quality</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Regular Articles</topic><topic>Sheep, Domestic - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Sheep, Domestic - physiology</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Obeidat, Belal S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shdaifat, Mustafa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ata, Mysaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obeidat, Mohammed D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nusairat, Basheer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aloueedat, Mohammad K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Khaza’leh, Ja’far</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Milton G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Obeidat, Belal S.</au><au>Shdaifat, Mustafa M.</au><au>Ata, Mysaa</au><au>Obeidat, Mohammed D.</au><au>Nusairat, Basheer M.</au><au>Aloueedat, Mohammad K.</au><au>Al-Khaza’leh, Ja’far</au><au>Thomas, Milton G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of chickpea grain feeding on the growth and carcass features of growing lambs</atitle><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle><stitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</stitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>273</spage><pages>273-</pages><artnum>273</artnum><issn>0049-4747</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><eissn>1573-7438</eissn><abstract>An investigation was conducted to find out how diet formulation of chickpea grains (CHPE) rather than soybean meal and barely grain affected the performance, blood metabolites, carcass, and meat quality features of Awassi lambs. Thirty lambs, with an average age of 73 ± 0.85 days and an initial body weight of 21.0 ± 1.29 kg, were randomly assigned into one of three diets, with 10 lambs per treatment diet. The diets were designed to replace a portion of the barley grain and soybean meal and included no CHPE (CON), 7.5% CHPE (CHPE7.5), and 15% CHPE (CHPE15). Lambs were individually housed, fed every day, and weighed every two weeks to measure performance characteristics over the 60-day study period. Four lambs per treatment were chosen at random on day 42 to participate in an N balance study and assess diet digestibility. All lambs were slaughtered at the termination of the trial period to measure the features of the carcass characteristics and meat quality. As the amount of CHPE included in the diets increased, the cost of diets reduced. As the amount of CHPE in the diets increased, so did the intake of ether extract (EE). The CON group’s cost per kilogram of increase was higher ( P  = 0.017) than that of the CHPE7.5 and CHEP15 groups. The digestibility of EE was higher ( P  = 0.024) in the CHPE15 diet as opposed to the CHPE7.5 and CON diets. The various treatments did not impact blood metabolites, carcass features, or meat quality. Therefore, the present study suggested that chickpeas might be added to the diets of finishing lambs up to 15% of dry matter.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>39313618</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11250-024-04108-6</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0315-4032</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-4747
ispartof Tropical animal health and production, 2024-11, Vol.56 (8), p.273, Article 273
issn 0049-4747
1573-7438
1573-7438
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3108762640
source Springer Link
subjects Agricultural economics
Animal Feed - analysis
Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Blood
Body weight
Carcasses
Chickpeas
Cicer - chemistry
Cost analysis
Diet
Diet - veterinary
Digestibility
Digestion
Dry matter
Grain
Life Sciences
Male
Meat
Meat quality
Metabolites
Random Allocation
Regular Articles
Sheep, Domestic - growth & development
Sheep, Domestic - physiology
Soybeans
Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science
Weight
Zoology
title Effects of chickpea grain feeding on the growth and carcass features of growing lambs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A57%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20chickpea%20grain%20feeding%20on%20the%20growth%20and%20carcass%20features%20of%20growing%20lambs&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20animal%20health%20and%20production&rft.au=Obeidat,%20Belal%20S.&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=273&rft.pages=273-&rft.artnum=273&rft.issn=0049-4747&rft.eissn=1573-7438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11250-024-04108-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3108762640%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-e5012dbb47fd3d4884ab79676c5ec1710b1073f1345e4fd4af88a79155dd7c3a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3108456293&rft_id=info:pmid/39313618&rfr_iscdi=true