Loading…
Comparison of Soil Organic Matter in Created, Restored and Paired Natural Wetlands in North Carolina
Soil organic matter (SOM) content is a key indicator of soil quality and is correlated to a number of important soil processes that occur in wetlands such as respiration, denitrification, and phosphorus sorption. To better understand the differences in the SOM content of created (CW), restored (RW),...
Saved in:
Published in: | Wetlands ecology and management 2006-06, Vol.14 (3), p.245-251 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e8d37c8f2dcb9f986ba8b8fa54dcd015fc970058dc19a41235308fe8e51ef6c63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e8d37c8f2dcb9f986ba8b8fa54dcd015fc970058dc19a41235308fe8e51ef6c63 |
container_end_page | 251 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 245 |
container_title | Wetlands ecology and management |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Bruland, Gregory L Richardson, Curtis J |
description | Soil organic matter (SOM) content is a key indicator of soil quality and is correlated to a number of important soil processes that occur in wetlands such as respiration, denitrification, and phosphorus sorption. To better understand the differences in the SOM content of created (CW), restored (RW), and paired natural wetlands (NWs), 11 CW/RW-NW pairs were sampled in North Carolina. The site pairs spanned a range of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) subclasses common in the Coastal Plain. The following null hypotheses were tested: (1) SOM content of paired CW/RWs and NWs are similar; (2) SOM content of wetlands across different HGM subclasses is similar; and (3) interactions between wetland status (CW/RW vs. NW) and hydrogeomorphic subclass are similar. The first null hypothesis was rejected as CW/RWs had significantly lower mean SOM (11.8 ± 3.9%) than their paired NWs (28.98 ± 8.0%) on average and at 10 out of the 11 individual sites. The second and third null hypotheses were also rejected as CW/RWs and NWs in the non-riverine organic soil flat subclass had significantly higher mean SOM content (31.08 ± 14.2%) than the other three subclasses (8.18 ± 2.5, 11.18 ± 8.2, and 10.38 ± 4.2%). Individual sites within this fourth subclass also had significantly different SOM content. This indicated that it would be inappropriate to include the organic soil flat subclass with either the riverine or non-riverine mineral soil flat subclasses when considering restoration guidelines. These results also suggested that if there is a choice in mitigation options between restoration or creation, wetlands should be restored rather than created, especially those in the non-riverine organic soil flat subclass.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11273-005-1116-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31091853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20400027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e8d37c8f2dcb9f986ba8b8fa54dcd015fc970058dc19a41235308fe8e51ef6c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTlPAzEQhS0EEiHwA-gsCioMnvUe3hKtuKSQIA5RWo4P2GizDra3IL8er0JFQzWj0Tej9-YhdAr0EiitrgJAVjFCaUEAoCTbPTSBospIzVm-jya0zhjJeQmH6CiEFaVpq4YJ0o1bb6Rvg-uxs_jFtR1e-A_Ztwo_yhiNx22PG29kNPoCP5sQnTcay17jJ9mO7VzGwcsOv5vYpXEYF-bOx0_cSO-6tpfH6MDKLpiT3zpFb7c3r809mS3uHprrGVFZXkdiuGaV4jbTalnbmpdLyZfcyiLXSlMorKqrZJBrBbXMIWMFo9wabgowtlQlm6Lz3d2Nd19DkirWbVCmS7KMG4JgkDzzgv0LZjSnlKaHTtHZH3DlBt8nE6LKE0BZmScIdpDyLgRvrNj4di39twAqxnTELh2RxIsxHbFlP67DglU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>740270364</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Soil Organic Matter in Created, Restored and Paired Natural Wetlands in North Carolina</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Bruland, Gregory L ; Richardson, Curtis J</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruland, Gregory L ; Richardson, Curtis J</creatorcontrib><description>Soil organic matter (SOM) content is a key indicator of soil quality and is correlated to a number of important soil processes that occur in wetlands such as respiration, denitrification, and phosphorus sorption. To better understand the differences in the SOM content of created (CW), restored (RW), and paired natural wetlands (NWs), 11 CW/RW-NW pairs were sampled in North Carolina. The site pairs spanned a range of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) subclasses common in the Coastal Plain. The following null hypotheses were tested: (1) SOM content of paired CW/RWs and NWs are similar; (2) SOM content of wetlands across different HGM subclasses is similar; and (3) interactions between wetland status (CW/RW vs. NW) and hydrogeomorphic subclass are similar. The first null hypothesis was rejected as CW/RWs had significantly lower mean SOM (11.8 ± 3.9%) than their paired NWs (28.98 ± 8.0%) on average and at 10 out of the 11 individual sites. The second and third null hypotheses were also rejected as CW/RWs and NWs in the non-riverine organic soil flat subclass had significantly higher mean SOM content (31.08 ± 14.2%) than the other three subclasses (8.18 ± 2.5, 11.18 ± 8.2, and 10.38 ± 4.2%). Individual sites within this fourth subclass also had significantly different SOM content. This indicated that it would be inappropriate to include the organic soil flat subclass with either the riverine or non-riverine mineral soil flat subclasses when considering restoration guidelines. These results also suggested that if there is a choice in mitigation options between restoration or creation, wetlands should be restored rather than created, especially those in the non-riverine organic soil flat subclass.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0923-4861</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11273-005-1116-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Brackish ; Coastal plains ; Environmental restoration ; Freshwater ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; Soil organic matter ; Soil quality ; Soils ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Wetlands ecology and management, 2006-06, Vol.14 (3), p.245-251</ispartof><rights>Springer 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e8d37c8f2dcb9f986ba8b8fa54dcd015fc970058dc19a41235308fe8e51ef6c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e8d37c8f2dcb9f986ba8b8fa54dcd015fc970058dc19a41235308fe8e51ef6c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruland, Gregory L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Curtis J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Soil Organic Matter in Created, Restored and Paired Natural Wetlands in North Carolina</title><title>Wetlands ecology and management</title><description>Soil organic matter (SOM) content is a key indicator of soil quality and is correlated to a number of important soil processes that occur in wetlands such as respiration, denitrification, and phosphorus sorption. To better understand the differences in the SOM content of created (CW), restored (RW), and paired natural wetlands (NWs), 11 CW/RW-NW pairs were sampled in North Carolina. The site pairs spanned a range of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) subclasses common in the Coastal Plain. The following null hypotheses were tested: (1) SOM content of paired CW/RWs and NWs are similar; (2) SOM content of wetlands across different HGM subclasses is similar; and (3) interactions between wetland status (CW/RW vs. NW) and hydrogeomorphic subclass are similar. The first null hypothesis was rejected as CW/RWs had significantly lower mean SOM (11.8 ± 3.9%) than their paired NWs (28.98 ± 8.0%) on average and at 10 out of the 11 individual sites. The second and third null hypotheses were also rejected as CW/RWs and NWs in the non-riverine organic soil flat subclass had significantly higher mean SOM content (31.08 ± 14.2%) than the other three subclasses (8.18 ± 2.5, 11.18 ± 8.2, and 10.38 ± 4.2%). Individual sites within this fourth subclass also had significantly different SOM content. This indicated that it would be inappropriate to include the organic soil flat subclass with either the riverine or non-riverine mineral soil flat subclasses when considering restoration guidelines. These results also suggested that if there is a choice in mitigation options between restoration or creation, wetlands should be restored rather than created, especially those in the non-riverine organic soil flat subclass.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Coastal plains</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0923-4861</issn><issn>1572-9834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkTlPAzEQhS0EEiHwA-gsCioMnvUe3hKtuKSQIA5RWo4P2GizDra3IL8er0JFQzWj0Tej9-YhdAr0EiitrgJAVjFCaUEAoCTbPTSBospIzVm-jya0zhjJeQmH6CiEFaVpq4YJ0o1bb6Rvg-uxs_jFtR1e-A_Ztwo_yhiNx22PG29kNPoCP5sQnTcay17jJ9mO7VzGwcsOv5vYpXEYF-bOx0_cSO-6tpfH6MDKLpiT3zpFb7c3r809mS3uHprrGVFZXkdiuGaV4jbTalnbmpdLyZfcyiLXSlMorKqrZJBrBbXMIWMFo9wabgowtlQlm6Lz3d2Nd19DkirWbVCmS7KMG4JgkDzzgv0LZjSnlKaHTtHZH3DlBt8nE6LKE0BZmScIdpDyLgRvrNj4di39twAqxnTELh2RxIsxHbFlP67DglU</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Bruland, Gregory L</creator><creator>Richardson, Curtis J</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Comparison of Soil Organic Matter in Created, Restored and Paired Natural Wetlands in North Carolina</title><author>Bruland, Gregory L ; Richardson, Curtis J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e8d37c8f2dcb9f986ba8b8fa54dcd015fc970058dc19a41235308fe8e51ef6c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Coastal plains</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruland, Gregory L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Curtis J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Wetlands ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruland, Gregory L</au><au>Richardson, Curtis J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Soil Organic Matter in Created, Restored and Paired Natural Wetlands in North Carolina</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands ecology and management</jtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>245-251</pages><issn>0923-4861</issn><eissn>1572-9834</eissn><abstract>Soil organic matter (SOM) content is a key indicator of soil quality and is correlated to a number of important soil processes that occur in wetlands such as respiration, denitrification, and phosphorus sorption. To better understand the differences in the SOM content of created (CW), restored (RW), and paired natural wetlands (NWs), 11 CW/RW-NW pairs were sampled in North Carolina. The site pairs spanned a range of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) subclasses common in the Coastal Plain. The following null hypotheses were tested: (1) SOM content of paired CW/RWs and NWs are similar; (2) SOM content of wetlands across different HGM subclasses is similar; and (3) interactions between wetland status (CW/RW vs. NW) and hydrogeomorphic subclass are similar. The first null hypothesis was rejected as CW/RWs had significantly lower mean SOM (11.8 ± 3.9%) than their paired NWs (28.98 ± 8.0%) on average and at 10 out of the 11 individual sites. The second and third null hypotheses were also rejected as CW/RWs and NWs in the non-riverine organic soil flat subclass had significantly higher mean SOM content (31.08 ± 14.2%) than the other three subclasses (8.18 ± 2.5, 11.18 ± 8.2, and 10.38 ± 4.2%). Individual sites within this fourth subclass also had significantly different SOM content. This indicated that it would be inappropriate to include the organic soil flat subclass with either the riverine or non-riverine mineral soil flat subclasses when considering restoration guidelines. These results also suggested that if there is a choice in mitigation options between restoration or creation, wetlands should be restored rather than created, especially those in the non-riverine organic soil flat subclass.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s11273-005-1116-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0923-4861 |
ispartof | Wetlands ecology and management, 2006-06, Vol.14 (3), p.245-251 |
issn | 0923-4861 1572-9834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31091853 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Brackish Coastal plains Environmental restoration Freshwater Organic matter Organic soils Soil organic matter Soil quality Soils Wetlands |
title | Comparison of Soil Organic Matter in Created, Restored and Paired Natural Wetlands in North Carolina |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T05%3A01%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Soil%20Organic%20Matter%20in%20Created,%20Restored%20and%20Paired%20Natural%20Wetlands%20in%20North%20Carolina&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Bruland,%20Gregory%20L&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=245-251&rft.issn=0923-4861&rft.eissn=1572-9834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11273-005-1116-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20400027%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e8d37c8f2dcb9f986ba8b8fa54dcd015fc970058dc19a41235308fe8e51ef6c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=740270364&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |