Motor Point as an Alternative to Femoral Nerve Stimulation for the Assessment of Quadriceps Muscle Inhibition in Healthy Women

• Published in: Journal of sport rehabilitation 2024-11, Vol.33 (8), p.677-682
• Main Authors: Pompeo, Klauber D, Rabello, Rodrigo, Morales, Anete B, Klein, Kelli D, Frasson, Viviane B, Maffiuletti, Nicola A, Vaz, Marco A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Electric Stimulation - methods; Female; Femoral Nerve - physiology; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Knee Joint - physiology; Muscle Contraction - physiology; Quadriceps Muscle - physiology; Torque; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1056-6716; 1543-3072; 1543-3072
• DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2024-0120

The evaluation of quadriceps muscle inhibition with the interpolated twitch technique is usually performed by stimulating the femoral nerve (FN). However, there are some problems related to the use of this stimulation site, which may be partially overcome by delivering the stimulation over the motor point (MP). This study sought to compare MP to FN stimulation at different joint angles for the evaluation of quadriceps muscle inhibition, resting peak torque, and discomfort in healthy women. Cross-sectional study. Sixteen healthy women (age: 28 [4] y; body mass: 60 [5] kg; height: 162 [5] cm) participated in this study. Supramaximal paired stimuli were delivered to the FN and to the rectus femoris MP before and during maximal voluntary contractions at different knee angles (15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion) to assess muscle inhibition and resting peak torque. Discomfort was also recorded for each stimulation site and knee angle. Muscle inhibition was similar between the 2 stimulation sites (P > .05) and was higher at 45° than at 90° (P = .03). MP stimulation evoked lower resting peak torque at 30° (P = .004), 60° (P = .006), and 90° (P = .006) and higher discomfort at 30° (P = .008) and 90° (P = .027) compared to FN stimulation. Despite lower resting peak torque and higher discomfort at some angles, MP stimulation provided similar muscle inhibition to FN stimulation at all knee angles and is therefore a valid method to evaluate quadriceps muscle inhibition in healthy women. MP stimulation can be used as an alternative to FN stimulation for the evaluation of quadriceps muscle inhibition with no added discomfort at the angles where muscle inhibition is the highest.