Loading…
Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review
Objective To summarise the evidence on the effect of physiotherapy-led versus physician-led care on clinical outcomes, healthcare use, and costs in persons with low back pain. Data sources PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and PEDro were systematically searched with the latest search performed...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical rehabilitation 2024-12, Vol.38 (12), p.1571-1589 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-3c0a21f8ea800e252d15539a10a8a03e243e7dcbb76857c763ae060117e296543 |
container_end_page | 1589 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1571 |
container_title | Clinical rehabilitation |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Severijns, Pieter Goossens, Nina Dankaerts, Wim Pitance, Laurent Roussel, Nathalie Denis, Corentin Fourré, Antoine Verschueren, Pieter Timmermans, Annick Janssens, Lotte |
description | Objective
To summarise the evidence on the effect of physiotherapy-led versus physician-led care on clinical outcomes, healthcare use, and costs in persons with low back pain.
Data sources
PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and PEDro were systematically searched with the latest search performed in July 2024. Reference lists of articles were hand-searched.
Review methods
Studies comparing clinical outcomes, healthcare use, or costs between adults with low back pain first consulting a physiotherapist and those first consulting a physician were included. Methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Study design, clinical setting, patient characteristics, and group effects were extracted. Findings on outcomes assessed in two or more studies were synthesised narratively. Certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE approach.
Results
Eighteen studies comprising 1,481,980 persons with low back pain were included. Most studies were non-randomised retrospective or prospective cohort studies. In primary care (15 studies), consistent evidence, though of mostly very low certainty, indicated that physiotherapy-led care leads to higher patient satisfaction, less use of medication, injections and imaging, fewer physician's visits, lower total healthcare costs, and less sick leave compared to physician-led care, without increased harm. In emergency care (three studies), evidence of very low certainty showed that physiotherapy-led care leads to shorter waiting and treatment times, and fewer hospital admissions.
Conclusion
Physiotherapy-led care is a clinically, time- and cost-effective care pathway for low back pain, although the certainty of evidence was overall very low. Further high-quality research with a greater focus on clinical outcomes is warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/02692155241282987 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3110402735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_02692155241282987</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3110402735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-3c0a21f8ea800e252d15539a10a8a03e243e7dcbb76857c763ae060117e296543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1PwzAMhiMEYuPjB3BBkbhw6XCStkm5TRNf0iQ4wLnKUo91dG1J2k3996TaYBKIkw_v48eWTcgFgxFjUt4AjxPOooiHjCueKHlAhiyUMgAlxSEZ9nnQAwNy4twSAJRHj8lAJIIrYDAk2cuic3nVLNDqugsKzKjRFukarWsdrfvU5LrcJ_PK0tqnVenoJm8WtKg2dKbNB611Xt7SMXWda3Clm9xQi-scN2fkaK4Lh-e7ekre7u9eJ4_B9PnhaTKeBoZH0ATCgOZsrlArAOQRz_zqItEMtNIgkIcCZWZmMxmrSBoZC40Qgz8F8iSOQnFKrrfe2lafLbomXeXOYFHoEqvWpYIxCIFLEXn06he6rFpb-u08xf0Ab-yFbEsZWzlncZ7WNl9p26UM0v4F6Z8X-J7LnbmdrTD76fi-uQdGW8Dpd9yP_d_4BT6-jOk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3127682964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Severijns, Pieter ; Goossens, Nina ; Dankaerts, Wim ; Pitance, Laurent ; Roussel, Nathalie ; Denis, Corentin ; Fourré, Antoine ; Verschueren, Pieter ; Timmermans, Annick ; Janssens, Lotte</creator><creatorcontrib>Severijns, Pieter ; Goossens, Nina ; Dankaerts, Wim ; Pitance, Laurent ; Roussel, Nathalie ; Denis, Corentin ; Fourré, Antoine ; Verschueren, Pieter ; Timmermans, Annick ; Janssens, Lotte</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To summarise the evidence on the effect of physiotherapy-led versus physician-led care on clinical outcomes, healthcare use, and costs in persons with low back pain.
Data sources
PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and PEDro were systematically searched with the latest search performed in July 2024. Reference lists of articles were hand-searched.
Review methods
Studies comparing clinical outcomes, healthcare use, or costs between adults with low back pain first consulting a physiotherapist and those first consulting a physician were included. Methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Study design, clinical setting, patient characteristics, and group effects were extracted. Findings on outcomes assessed in two or more studies were synthesised narratively. Certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE approach.
Results
Eighteen studies comprising 1,481,980 persons with low back pain were included. Most studies were non-randomised retrospective or prospective cohort studies. In primary care (15 studies), consistent evidence, though of mostly very low certainty, indicated that physiotherapy-led care leads to higher patient satisfaction, less use of medication, injections and imaging, fewer physician's visits, lower total healthcare costs, and less sick leave compared to physician-led care, without increased harm. In emergency care (three studies), evidence of very low certainty showed that physiotherapy-led care leads to shorter waiting and treatment times, and fewer hospital admissions.
Conclusion
Physiotherapy-led care is a clinically, time- and cost-effective care pathway for low back pain, although the certainty of evidence was overall very low. Further high-quality research with a greater focus on clinical outcomes is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2155</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1477-0873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0873</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02692155241282987</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39328010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Clinical outcomes ; Cohort analysis ; Cost analysis ; Costs ; Drugs ; Emergency services ; Health care expenditures ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Low back pain ; Low Back Pain - rehabilitation ; Low Back Pain - therapy ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Physical therapists ; Physical therapy ; Physical Therapy Modalities - economics ; Physicians ; Physiotherapy ; Primary care ; Sick leave ; Systematic review ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Clinical rehabilitation, 2024-12, Vol.38 (12), p.1571-1589</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-3c0a21f8ea800e252d15539a10a8a03e243e7dcbb76857c763ae060117e296543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6133-4915 ; 0000-0002-9458-3125</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39328010$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Severijns, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goossens, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dankaerts, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitance, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roussel, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denis, Corentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourré, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verschueren, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmermans, Annick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssens, Lotte</creatorcontrib><title>Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review</title><title>Clinical rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Clin Rehabil</addtitle><description>Objective
To summarise the evidence on the effect of physiotherapy-led versus physician-led care on clinical outcomes, healthcare use, and costs in persons with low back pain.
Data sources
PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and PEDro were systematically searched with the latest search performed in July 2024. Reference lists of articles were hand-searched.
Review methods
Studies comparing clinical outcomes, healthcare use, or costs between adults with low back pain first consulting a physiotherapist and those first consulting a physician were included. Methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Study design, clinical setting, patient characteristics, and group effects were extracted. Findings on outcomes assessed in two or more studies were synthesised narratively. Certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE approach.
Results
Eighteen studies comprising 1,481,980 persons with low back pain were included. Most studies were non-randomised retrospective or prospective cohort studies. In primary care (15 studies), consistent evidence, though of mostly very low certainty, indicated that physiotherapy-led care leads to higher patient satisfaction, less use of medication, injections and imaging, fewer physician's visits, lower total healthcare costs, and less sick leave compared to physician-led care, without increased harm. In emergency care (three studies), evidence of very low certainty showed that physiotherapy-led care leads to shorter waiting and treatment times, and fewer hospital admissions.
Conclusion
Physiotherapy-led care is a clinically, time- and cost-effective care pathway for low back pain, although the certainty of evidence was overall very low. Further high-quality research with a greater focus on clinical outcomes is warranted.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical therapists</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities - economics</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physiotherapy</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Sick leave</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0269-2155</issn><issn>1477-0873</issn><issn>1477-0873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1PwzAMhiMEYuPjB3BBkbhw6XCStkm5TRNf0iQ4wLnKUo91dG1J2k3996TaYBKIkw_v48eWTcgFgxFjUt4AjxPOooiHjCueKHlAhiyUMgAlxSEZ9nnQAwNy4twSAJRHj8lAJIIrYDAk2cuic3nVLNDqugsKzKjRFukarWsdrfvU5LrcJ_PK0tqnVenoJm8WtKg2dKbNB611Xt7SMXWda3Clm9xQi-scN2fkaK4Lh-e7ekre7u9eJ4_B9PnhaTKeBoZH0ATCgOZsrlArAOQRz_zqItEMtNIgkIcCZWZmMxmrSBoZC40Qgz8F8iSOQnFKrrfe2lafLbomXeXOYFHoEqvWpYIxCIFLEXn06he6rFpb-u08xf0Ab-yFbEsZWzlncZ7WNl9p26UM0v4F6Z8X-J7LnbmdrTD76fi-uQdGW8Dpd9yP_d_4BT6-jOk</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Severijns, Pieter</creator><creator>Goossens, Nina</creator><creator>Dankaerts, Wim</creator><creator>Pitance, Laurent</creator><creator>Roussel, Nathalie</creator><creator>Denis, Corentin</creator><creator>Fourré, Antoine</creator><creator>Verschueren, Pieter</creator><creator>Timmermans, Annick</creator><creator>Janssens, Lotte</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6133-4915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-3125</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review</title><author>Severijns, Pieter ; Goossens, Nina ; Dankaerts, Wim ; Pitance, Laurent ; Roussel, Nathalie ; Denis, Corentin ; Fourré, Antoine ; Verschueren, Pieter ; Timmermans, Annick ; Janssens, Lotte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-3c0a21f8ea800e252d15539a10a8a03e243e7dcbb76857c763ae060117e296543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical therapists</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities - economics</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physiotherapy</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Sick leave</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Severijns, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goossens, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dankaerts, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitance, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roussel, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denis, Corentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourré, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verschueren, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmermans, Annick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssens, Lotte</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Severijns, Pieter</au><au>Goossens, Nina</au><au>Dankaerts, Wim</au><au>Pitance, Laurent</au><au>Roussel, Nathalie</au><au>Denis, Corentin</au><au>Fourré, Antoine</au><au>Verschueren, Pieter</au><au>Timmermans, Annick</au><au>Janssens, Lotte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Rehabil</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1571</spage><epage>1589</epage><pages>1571-1589</pages><issn>0269-2155</issn><issn>1477-0873</issn><eissn>1477-0873</eissn><abstract>Objective
To summarise the evidence on the effect of physiotherapy-led versus physician-led care on clinical outcomes, healthcare use, and costs in persons with low back pain.
Data sources
PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and PEDro were systematically searched with the latest search performed in July 2024. Reference lists of articles were hand-searched.
Review methods
Studies comparing clinical outcomes, healthcare use, or costs between adults with low back pain first consulting a physiotherapist and those first consulting a physician were included. Methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Study design, clinical setting, patient characteristics, and group effects were extracted. Findings on outcomes assessed in two or more studies were synthesised narratively. Certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE approach.
Results
Eighteen studies comprising 1,481,980 persons with low back pain were included. Most studies were non-randomised retrospective or prospective cohort studies. In primary care (15 studies), consistent evidence, though of mostly very low certainty, indicated that physiotherapy-led care leads to higher patient satisfaction, less use of medication, injections and imaging, fewer physician's visits, lower total healthcare costs, and less sick leave compared to physician-led care, without increased harm. In emergency care (three studies), evidence of very low certainty showed that physiotherapy-led care leads to shorter waiting and treatment times, and fewer hospital admissions.
Conclusion
Physiotherapy-led care is a clinically, time- and cost-effective care pathway for low back pain, although the certainty of evidence was overall very low. Further high-quality research with a greater focus on clinical outcomes is warranted.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>39328010</pmid><doi>10.1177/02692155241282987</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6133-4915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-3125</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-2155 |
ispartof | Clinical rehabilitation, 2024-12, Vol.38 (12), p.1571-1589 |
issn | 0269-2155 1477-0873 1477-0873 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3110402735 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE |
subjects | Back pain Clinical outcomes Cohort analysis Cost analysis Costs Drugs Emergency services Health care expenditures Hospitalization Humans Low back pain Low Back Pain - rehabilitation Low Back Pain - therapy Patient satisfaction Patients Physical therapists Physical therapy Physical Therapy Modalities - economics Physicians Physiotherapy Primary care Sick leave Systematic review Uncertainty |
title | Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A06%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physiotherapy-led%20care%20versus%20physician-led%20care%20for%20persons%20with%20low%20back%20pain:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Severijns,%20Pieter&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1571&rft.epage=1589&rft.pages=1571-1589&rft.issn=0269-2155&rft.eissn=1477-0873&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02692155241282987&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3110402735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-3c0a21f8ea800e252d15539a10a8a03e243e7dcbb76857c763ae060117e296543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3127682964&rft_id=info:pmid/39328010&rft_sage_id=10.1177_02692155241282987&rfr_iscdi=true |