Loading…

Routine third-trimester ultrasonography and child neurodevelopmental outcomes: a follow-up of a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial

Routine third-trimester ultrasonography is increasingly conducted to screen for foetal growth restriction (FGR) and reduce adverse perinatal and child neurodevelopmental outcomes using timely obstetric management. While it did not reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in previous trials, evidence regard...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of reproductive and infant psychology 2024-10, p.1-16
Main Authors: Henrichs, Jens, van Roekel, Marielle, Witteveen, Anke B, Veder, Michael, Feenstra, Yoni, Franx, Arie, de Kroon, Marlou L A, van Baar, Anneloes, Verhoeven, Corine J, de Jonge, Ank
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-ce0aa1182fd195f6345f462d7fc401323131502833aa9ce680a8d3d8106c87563
container_end_page 16
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of reproductive and infant psychology
container_volume
creator Henrichs, Jens
van Roekel, Marielle
Witteveen, Anke B
Veder, Michael
Feenstra, Yoni
Franx, Arie
de Kroon, Marlou L A
van Baar, Anneloes
Verhoeven, Corine J
de Jonge, Ank
description Routine third-trimester ultrasonography is increasingly conducted to screen for foetal growth restriction (FGR) and reduce adverse perinatal and child neurodevelopmental outcomes using timely obstetric management. While it did not reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in previous trials, evidence regarding its association with child neurodevelopmental outcome is absent. We examined whether routine third-trimester ultrasonography is positively associated with child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes compared to usual care. Dutch mothers with a low-risk pregnancy participating in a subsample (  = 1070) of a nationwide cluster-randomised trial reported infant (age 6 months) and toddler (age 28 months) developmental milestones (Ages and Stages Questionnaire) and toddlers' internalising and externalising problems (Child Behavior Checklist). Usual care (  = 380) comprised selective ultrasonography. The intervention strategy (  = 690) included two routine third-trimester ultrasounds next to usual care. Both strategies applied the same interdisciplinary protocol for FGR detection and management. Adjusted linear mixed-level regressions revealed that routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly related to z-standardised infant developmental milestones at 6-month follow-up, B = 0.20, 95%CI [0.07; 0.32],  = 0.003, compared to usual care. At 28-month follow-up, these strategies did not differ in child developmental outcome and internalising and externalising problems. Routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly associated with infant development. In toddlerhood, routine ultrasonography was not related to child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes. Overall, these findings do not support the implementation of routine third-trimester ultrasonography for low-risk pregnant women for reasons concerning children's early neurodevelopmental outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02646838.2024.2409145
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3112118790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3112118790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-ce0aa1182fd195f6345f462d7fc401323131502833aa9ce680a8d3d8106c87563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kdtKxDAQhoMo7rr6CEouvemaU9PUOxFPIAii4F2JOexW0qYmqbIP4TubsqtXk4H__2YyPwCnGC0xEugCEc64oGJJEGFLwlCNWbkH5pjxuuAVedsH80lTTKIZOIrxAyFEKa8OwYzWtOS4ZHPw8-zH1PYGpnUbdJFC25mYTICjS0FG3_tVkMN6A2WvoVq3TsPejMFr82WcHzrTJ-lgZiifjZdQQuud89_FOEBvczsEuepkahVUbpzIRcgo37XRZKDvU8j6_MyTpTsGB1a6aE52dQFeb29eru-Lx6e7h-urx0IRylKhDJISY0GsxnVpOWWlZZzoyiqGMCUUU1wiIiiVslaGCySFplpgxJWoSk4X4HzLHYL_HPOHm7yPMs7J3vgxNhRjkvlVjbK03EpV8DEGY5sh30iGTYNRMyXR_CXRTEk0uySy72w3YnzvjP53_Z2e_gIe4ob_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3112118790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Routine third-trimester ultrasonography and child neurodevelopmental outcomes: a follow-up of a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial</title><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Henrichs, Jens ; van Roekel, Marielle ; Witteveen, Anke B ; Veder, Michael ; Feenstra, Yoni ; Franx, Arie ; de Kroon, Marlou L A ; van Baar, Anneloes ; Verhoeven, Corine J ; de Jonge, Ank</creator><creatorcontrib>Henrichs, Jens ; van Roekel, Marielle ; Witteveen, Anke B ; Veder, Michael ; Feenstra, Yoni ; Franx, Arie ; de Kroon, Marlou L A ; van Baar, Anneloes ; Verhoeven, Corine J ; de Jonge, Ank ; IRIS Study Group ; The IRIS Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Routine third-trimester ultrasonography is increasingly conducted to screen for foetal growth restriction (FGR) and reduce adverse perinatal and child neurodevelopmental outcomes using timely obstetric management. While it did not reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in previous trials, evidence regarding its association with child neurodevelopmental outcome is absent. We examined whether routine third-trimester ultrasonography is positively associated with child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes compared to usual care. Dutch mothers with a low-risk pregnancy participating in a subsample (  = 1070) of a nationwide cluster-randomised trial reported infant (age 6 months) and toddler (age 28 months) developmental milestones (Ages and Stages Questionnaire) and toddlers' internalising and externalising problems (Child Behavior Checklist). Usual care (  = 380) comprised selective ultrasonography. The intervention strategy (  = 690) included two routine third-trimester ultrasounds next to usual care. Both strategies applied the same interdisciplinary protocol for FGR detection and management. Adjusted linear mixed-level regressions revealed that routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly related to z-standardised infant developmental milestones at 6-month follow-up, B = 0.20, 95%CI [0.07; 0.32],  = 0.003, compared to usual care. At 28-month follow-up, these strategies did not differ in child developmental outcome and internalising and externalising problems. Routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly associated with infant development. In toddlerhood, routine ultrasonography was not related to child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes. Overall, these findings do not support the implementation of routine third-trimester ultrasonography for low-risk pregnant women for reasons concerning children's early neurodevelopmental outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-6838</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-672X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-672X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2024.2409145</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39356154</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Journal of reproductive and infant psychology, 2024-10, p.1-16</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-ce0aa1182fd195f6345f462d7fc401323131502833aa9ce680a8d3d8106c87563</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2238-4060 ; 0000-0002-9636-7522 ; 0000-0001-8801-5546 ; 0000-0003-1730-4994 ; 0000-0002-0001-0888 ; 0000-0002-5384-3744 ; 0000-0002-3498-9019</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39356154$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henrichs, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Roekel, Marielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witteveen, Anke B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veder, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feenstra, Yoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franx, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Kroon, Marlou L A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Baar, Anneloes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeven, Corine J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jonge, Ank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IRIS Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The IRIS Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Routine third-trimester ultrasonography and child neurodevelopmental outcomes: a follow-up of a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial</title><title>Journal of reproductive and infant psychology</title><addtitle>J Reprod Infant Psychol</addtitle><description>Routine third-trimester ultrasonography is increasingly conducted to screen for foetal growth restriction (FGR) and reduce adverse perinatal and child neurodevelopmental outcomes using timely obstetric management. While it did not reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in previous trials, evidence regarding its association with child neurodevelopmental outcome is absent. We examined whether routine third-trimester ultrasonography is positively associated with child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes compared to usual care. Dutch mothers with a low-risk pregnancy participating in a subsample (  = 1070) of a nationwide cluster-randomised trial reported infant (age 6 months) and toddler (age 28 months) developmental milestones (Ages and Stages Questionnaire) and toddlers' internalising and externalising problems (Child Behavior Checklist). Usual care (  = 380) comprised selective ultrasonography. The intervention strategy (  = 690) included two routine third-trimester ultrasounds next to usual care. Both strategies applied the same interdisciplinary protocol for FGR detection and management. Adjusted linear mixed-level regressions revealed that routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly related to z-standardised infant developmental milestones at 6-month follow-up, B = 0.20, 95%CI [0.07; 0.32],  = 0.003, compared to usual care. At 28-month follow-up, these strategies did not differ in child developmental outcome and internalising and externalising problems. Routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly associated with infant development. In toddlerhood, routine ultrasonography was not related to child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes. Overall, these findings do not support the implementation of routine third-trimester ultrasonography for low-risk pregnant women for reasons concerning children's early neurodevelopmental outcomes.</description><issn>0264-6838</issn><issn>1469-672X</issn><issn>1469-672X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kdtKxDAQhoMo7rr6CEouvemaU9PUOxFPIAii4F2JOexW0qYmqbIP4TubsqtXk4H__2YyPwCnGC0xEugCEc64oGJJEGFLwlCNWbkH5pjxuuAVedsH80lTTKIZOIrxAyFEKa8OwYzWtOS4ZHPw8-zH1PYGpnUbdJFC25mYTICjS0FG3_tVkMN6A2WvoVq3TsPejMFr82WcHzrTJ-lgZiifjZdQQuud89_FOEBvczsEuepkahVUbpzIRcgo37XRZKDvU8j6_MyTpTsGB1a6aE52dQFeb29eru-Lx6e7h-urx0IRylKhDJISY0GsxnVpOWWlZZzoyiqGMCUUU1wiIiiVslaGCySFplpgxJWoSk4X4HzLHYL_HPOHm7yPMs7J3vgxNhRjkvlVjbK03EpV8DEGY5sh30iGTYNRMyXR_CXRTEk0uySy72w3YnzvjP53_Z2e_gIe4ob_</recordid><startdate>20241002</startdate><enddate>20241002</enddate><creator>Henrichs, Jens</creator><creator>van Roekel, Marielle</creator><creator>Witteveen, Anke B</creator><creator>Veder, Michael</creator><creator>Feenstra, Yoni</creator><creator>Franx, Arie</creator><creator>de Kroon, Marlou L A</creator><creator>van Baar, Anneloes</creator><creator>Verhoeven, Corine J</creator><creator>de Jonge, Ank</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-4060</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9636-7522</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-5546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1730-4994</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-0888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-3744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3498-9019</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241002</creationdate><title>Routine third-trimester ultrasonography and child neurodevelopmental outcomes: a follow-up of a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial</title><author>Henrichs, Jens ; van Roekel, Marielle ; Witteveen, Anke B ; Veder, Michael ; Feenstra, Yoni ; Franx, Arie ; de Kroon, Marlou L A ; van Baar, Anneloes ; Verhoeven, Corine J ; de Jonge, Ank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-ce0aa1182fd195f6345f462d7fc401323131502833aa9ce680a8d3d8106c87563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henrichs, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Roekel, Marielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witteveen, Anke B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veder, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feenstra, Yoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franx, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Kroon, Marlou L A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Baar, Anneloes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeven, Corine J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jonge, Ank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IRIS Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The IRIS Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of reproductive and infant psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henrichs, Jens</au><au>van Roekel, Marielle</au><au>Witteveen, Anke B</au><au>Veder, Michael</au><au>Feenstra, Yoni</au><au>Franx, Arie</au><au>de Kroon, Marlou L A</au><au>van Baar, Anneloes</au><au>Verhoeven, Corine J</au><au>de Jonge, Ank</au><aucorp>IRIS Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>The IRIS Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Routine third-trimester ultrasonography and child neurodevelopmental outcomes: a follow-up of a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of reproductive and infant psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Reprod Infant Psychol</addtitle><date>2024-10-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>1-16</pages><issn>0264-6838</issn><issn>1469-672X</issn><eissn>1469-672X</eissn><abstract>Routine third-trimester ultrasonography is increasingly conducted to screen for foetal growth restriction (FGR) and reduce adverse perinatal and child neurodevelopmental outcomes using timely obstetric management. While it did not reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in previous trials, evidence regarding its association with child neurodevelopmental outcome is absent. We examined whether routine third-trimester ultrasonography is positively associated with child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes compared to usual care. Dutch mothers with a low-risk pregnancy participating in a subsample (  = 1070) of a nationwide cluster-randomised trial reported infant (age 6 months) and toddler (age 28 months) developmental milestones (Ages and Stages Questionnaire) and toddlers' internalising and externalising problems (Child Behavior Checklist). Usual care (  = 380) comprised selective ultrasonography. The intervention strategy (  = 690) included two routine third-trimester ultrasounds next to usual care. Both strategies applied the same interdisciplinary protocol for FGR detection and management. Adjusted linear mixed-level regressions revealed that routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly related to z-standardised infant developmental milestones at 6-month follow-up, B = 0.20, 95%CI [0.07; 0.32],  = 0.003, compared to usual care. At 28-month follow-up, these strategies did not differ in child developmental outcome and internalising and externalising problems. Routine third-trimester ultrasonography was positively but modestly associated with infant development. In toddlerhood, routine ultrasonography was not related to child developmental and behavioural/emotional outcomes. Overall, these findings do not support the implementation of routine third-trimester ultrasonography for low-risk pregnant women for reasons concerning children's early neurodevelopmental outcomes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39356154</pmid><doi>10.1080/02646838.2024.2409145</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-4060</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9636-7522</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-5546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1730-4994</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-0888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-3744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3498-9019</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-6838
ispartof Journal of reproductive and infant psychology, 2024-10, p.1-16
issn 0264-6838
1469-672X
1469-672X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3112118790
source Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
title Routine third-trimester ultrasonography and child neurodevelopmental outcomes: a follow-up of a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A08%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Routine%20third-trimester%20ultrasonography%20and%20child%20neurodevelopmental%20outcomes:%20a%20follow-up%20of%20a%20pragmatic%20cluster-randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20reproductive%20and%20infant%20psychology&rft.au=Henrichs,%20Jens&rft.aucorp=IRIS%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2024-10-02&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=1-16&rft.issn=0264-6838&rft.eissn=1469-672X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02646838.2024.2409145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3112118790%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-ce0aa1182fd195f6345f462d7fc401323131502833aa9ce680a8d3d8106c87563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3112118790&rft_id=info:pmid/39356154&rfr_iscdi=true