Dog swimming and ectoparasiticide water contamination in urban conservation areas: A case study on Hampstead Heath, London

• Published in: The Science of the total environment 2024-12, Vol.955, p.176686, Article 176686
• Main Authors: Yoder, Lauren E., Egli, Melanie, Richardson, Alexandra K., Brooker, Adrian, Perkins, Rosemary, Collins, C.M. Tilly, Cardwell, Jacqueline M., Barron, Leon P., Waage, Jeff
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Aquatic ecosystem; Cities; Dogs; Ecotoxicology; Environmental Monitoring; Insecticides - analysis; London; Neonicotinoids - analysis; Nitro Compounds - analysis; Pesticides; Pyrazoles - analysis; Swimming; Urban green space; Veterinary flea treatment; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176686

Widespread occurrence of two ectoparasiticide compounds in the aquatic environment, imidacloprid and fipronil, have prompted concerns about their potential environmental impacts. However, very little focus has been placed on water bodies in urban green spaces used for dog swimming. In this study, occurrence of both substances on Hampstead Heath, London, was compared in ponds with (n = 3) and without dog swimming activity (n = 3), as well as connecting streams above, between, and below these ponds (n = 6). Imidacloprid and fipronil were detected at main swimming points in dog swimming ponds at mean concentrations of 309 ± 104 ng/L and 32 ± 13 ng/L, respectively, indicating a high environmental risk in these samples. Measured concentrations in ponds not accessible for dog swimming were either below the limits of detection or limits of quantification for both chemicals. Across all ponds, there was a strong positive correlation between measured dog swimming activities and concentrations of imidacloprid (R2 = 0.91) and fipronil (R2 = 0.79). Some contamination was detected in connecting streams between ponds. A wider chemical analysis for the presence of urban waste water chemical residue signatures indicated minimal contamination, including in source waters. A survey of visitors who allow their dogs to swim in the sampled ponds confirmed frequent use of products containing imidacloprid and fipronil. In total, 86 % of 101 dog owners were unaware of the potential environmental impacts of products, and 94 % indicated that protecting nature would be an important consideration when selecting products. Besides the current practice of limiting dog access to ponds, information collected on product use and dog swimming practices identified additional opportunities to reduce contamination. We suggest that more cooperation between industry, regulators, veterinarians, green space managers, and the public can reduce risks to urban biodiversity while maintaining recreational benefits for dog owners and dogs. [Display omitted] •Demonstrated environmental contamination by ectoparasiticides in urban ponds•Imidacloprid and fipronil in dog ponds exceeded environmental toxicity thresholds•Concentrations strongly correlated with levels of dog swimming•Markers of wastewater contamination negligible in source waters•Survey of owners who swim dogs identified opportunities for risk reduction