Contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) guided biopsy using a prone table: A retrospective analysis of the preliminary experience in a single CEM referral center

• Published in: European journal of radiology 2024-12, Vol.181, p.111779, Article 111779
• Main Authors: Nori Cucchiari, Jacopo, Giudice, Lucia, Incardona, Ludovica Anna, Di Filippo, Giacomo, Bicchierai, Giulia, Cossu, Elsa, Bellini, Chiara, Vanzi, Ermanno, De Benedetto, Diego, Di Naro, Federica, Boeri, Cecilia, Vidali, Sofia, Miele, Vittorio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; CEM-Guided Biopsy; Contrast Media; Contrast-Enhanced Mammography; Dual-Energy Imaging; Female; Humans; Image-Guided Biopsy - methods; Mammography - methods; Middle Aged; Patient Positioning - methods; Preliminary Outcomes; Prone Position; Retrospective Studies; Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy
• ISSN: 0720-048X; 1872-7727; 1872-7727
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111779

This study evaluates the procedural efficacy and patient experience of Contrast Enhanced Mammography (CEM)-guided biopsies performed in a prone position using the Giotto Class 30,000 system. The emphasis is on the procedural advantages and clinical outcomes for “enhancing-only lesions” (EOLs). A retrospective analysis of 524 CEM examinations conducted from December 2023 to June 2024 at a tertiary referral center was performed. Patients referred for pre-surgical staging or evaluation of inconclusive findings from conventional imaging were included. The study utilized dual-energy imaging and vacuum-assisted biopsy techniques, focusing on patients with at least one EOL identified in their initial CEM. Exclusions were based on the absence of a primary or follow-up CEM conducted at our facility Endpoints of this work included procedure efficiency which was evaluated in terms of technical success (biopsy completion with adequate sampling), dose distribution and timing and detection of additional lesions and patients’ comfort evaluation, based on the rate of complications (hematomas) and procedure interruption due to patients’ specific request or fainting events. Among the evaluated cases, 37 EOLs were biopsied. The average procedure time was 15.8 min. Biopsies were successfully completed in 100% of cases. However, complications occurred in 27% of cases, primarily as hematomas and a significant histological finding rate of 97.3% was recorded. The use of the Giotto Class 30,000 system for CEM-guided biopsies in a prone position demonstrated high procedural success and was well-tolerated by patients, highlighting its potential to enhance procedural comfort and efficiency. These preliminary results validate the innovative approach, though further studies are required to solidify these findings and explore long-term outcomes.