Drought response strategies of vascular epiphytes in isolated pasture trees in a Costa Rican tropical montane landscape

• Published in: American journal of botany 2024-10, Vol.111 (10), p.e16423-n/a
• Main Authors: Vaughan, Damon, Williams, Cameron B., Nadkarni, Nalini, Dawson, Todd E., Draguljic, Danel, Næsborg, Rikke Reese, Gotsch, Sybil G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Climate change; Cloud forests; Clouds; Correlation; Drought; Dry season; Epiphytes; Forests; Microclimate; Moisture availability; Monteverde; Pasture; Rainy season; relict trees; sap flow; Seasons; Soil moisture; Trees; Tropical forests; Turgor; turgor loss point; Variance analysis; Velocity; Water potential; Water relations
• ISSN: 0002-9122; 1537-2197; 1537-2197
• DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.16423

Premise Vascular epiphytes of tropical montane cloud forests are vulnerable to climate change, particularly as cloud bases elevate and reduce atmospheric inputs to the system. However, studies have generally focused on epiphytes in contiguous forests, with little research being done on epiphytes on isolated pasture trees. We investigated water relations of pasture‐tree epiphytes at three sites located below and above the elevation of the average cloud base in Monteverde, Costa Rica. Methods We measured sap velocity and four microclimate variables in both the dry and wet season of 2018. We also measured functional traits, including pressure volume (PV) curves, predawn/midday water potential, and various lab‐based water relations traits. We used linear mixed models to assess the correlation between microclimate and sap velocity in both seasons and ANOVA to assess the variation in PV curve and water potential variables. Results The turgor loss point generally increased from the wettest to driest site. However, this trend was driven primarily by the increasing prevalence of leaf succulence at drier sites. Microclimatic variables correlated strongly with sap velocity in the wet season, but low soil moisture availability caused this correlation to break down during the dry season. Conclusions Our results emphasize the vulnerability of cloud forest epiphytes to rising cloud bases. This vulnerability may be more severe in pasture trees that lack the potential buffer of surrounding forest, but additional research that directly compares the canopy microclimate conditions between forest and pasture trees is needed to confirm this possibility.