The effect of prosthetic foot stiffness category on intact limb knee loading associated with osteoarthritis in people with transtibial amputation

• Published in: Journal of biomechanics 2024-11, Vol.176, p.112368, Article 112368
• Main Authors: Slater, Conrad, Halsne, Elizabeth G., Czerniecki, Joseph M., Morgenroth, David C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Amputation; Amputation, Surgical; Ankle; Artificial Limb; Artificial Limbs; Biomechanical engineering; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomechanics; Data collection; Feet; Foot - physiology; Foot - physiopathology; Force; Gait; Gait - physiology; Humans; Knee; Knee Joint - physiopathology; Male; Mechanical properties; Middle Aged; Motion detection; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery; Prostheses; Prosthesis Design; Prosthetics; Stiffness; Tibia - physiopathology; Velocity; Walking; Walking - physiology; Weight-Bearing - physiology
• ISSN: 0021-9290; 1873-2380; 1873-2380
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112368

Lower limb prosthesis users are at an increased risk of developing osteoarthritis in their intact knee. There is a scarcity of literature examining how the stiffness properties of commercially available prosthetic feet impact gait mechanics, including knee loading biomechanical variables that have been associated with the development of osteoarthritis. This study aimed to isolate the effect of commercial prosthetic foot stiffness on intact knee loading, prosthetic foot–ankle biomechanics, and user perception. Seventeen males with unilateral transtibial amputation were fit with three consecutive foot stiffness categories of a standardized energy-storing prosthetic foot in a randomized order and while blinded to foot condition. Biomechanical and self-report data were collected during level-ground walking in a motion analysis laboratory. As prosthetic foot stiffness increased, contralateral knee external adduction moment significantly decreased between stiff vs. medium and stiff vs. soft foot conditions. Prosthetic foot rollover radius increased as foot stiffness increased. However, prosthetic foot–ankle push-off peak power and work decreased as foot stiffness increased. On average, users favored the medium stiffness condition and were able to correctly identify the foot stiffness condition. Overall, these results raise questions about the relative contributions of foot stiffness and ankle push-off power to changes in contralateral knee loading. The findings contribute to our understanding of the relationships between prosthetic foot mechanical properties and gait biomechanical variables at the contralateral knee when prosthetic foot stiffness is modified without a corresponding alignment adjustment.