An exploratory study of perceptions and utilization of genetic information in the intended parent experience of oocyte donor selection

• Published in: Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2024-11, Vol.41 (11), p.2999-3011
• Main Authors: Kalscheur, Carolyn, Kashmola-Perez, Iman, Rust, Laura, McCarthy Veach, Patricia, Redlinger-Grosse, Krista
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Assisted Reproduction Technologies; Donor Selection; Endocrinology; Female; Genetic Carrier Screening; Genetic counseling; Genetic Counseling - psychology; Genetic screening; Genetic Testing; Gynecology; Human Genetics; Humans; Infertility; Information processing; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Oocyte Donation - psychology; Oocytes; Parents - psychology; Reproductive Medicine; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology; Reproductive technologies; Surveys; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tissue Donors - psychology
• ISSN: 1058-0468; 1573-7330; 1573-7330
• DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03298-0

Purpose Utilization of oocyte donation has become an increasingly common practice in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Since the introduction of larger carrier screening (CS) panels and extended family medical histories (EFMH), studies have not examined how this information factors into the oocyte donor selection process. This exploratory, qualitative study provides further insight into what role, if any, donors’ available genetic information (e.g., larger CS panels and EFMH) plays in selecting an oocyte donor. Methods An online screening survey was distributed to individuals who have undergone or are currently in the process of selecting an oocyte donor through the RESOLVE network and Mayo Clinic's Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility clinic. From 13 survey respondents, six oocyte recipients subsequently participated in semi-structured telephone interviews and discussed their experiences as oocyte recipients including their perceptions of donors’ available genetic information and process in choosing an oocyte donor. Results Genetic information was seen as valuable and reassuring for participants, particularly EFMH, but did not play a significant role in the selection process for these participants. Supplemental emergent themes provide context on the psychosocial complexities of the oocyte recipient experience and possible explanations for why genetic information is not a decisional priority. Participants indicated genetic information was not extensively discussed or fully explained by providers. Conclusions Results demonstrate how genetic counselors can be more involved in the pre-selection process to discuss the utility and limitations of genetic information, as well as address psychosocial issues common to the oocyte recipient experience.