Loading…

Validation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures in a non-automated lab setting

To speed up antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) proposed rapid AST (RAST), a disk diffusion method to be read after 4, 6 and 8 hours of incubation. We investigated the feasibility of implementation of RAST in a non-autom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta clinica belgica (English ed. Online) 2024-10, p.1-8
Main Authors: Strubbe, Gregory, Van Honacker, Eveline, Vandendriessche, Stien, Messiaen, Anne-Sophie, Verhasselt, Bruno, Boelens, Jerina
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1025-e27886babb0a1482c7c7e6af7b8a671c40e9151abfaa01bf9de9a2b5636595a63
container_end_page 8
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Acta clinica belgica (English ed. Online)
container_volume
creator Strubbe, Gregory
Van Honacker, Eveline
Vandendriessche, Stien
Messiaen, Anne-Sophie
Verhasselt, Bruno
Boelens, Jerina
description To speed up antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) proposed rapid AST (RAST), a disk diffusion method to be read after 4, 6 and 8 hours of incubation. We investigated the feasibility of implementation of RAST in a non-automated lab setting. To this end, reference strains as well as a variety of clinical and resistant strains were used to spike sterile hemocultures (BioMérieux BACT/ALERT 3D® and Becton Dickinson BACTEC FX® systems), followed by RAST in comparison to classical long-incubation AST. Our results with reference strains show that reading RAST after 4 hours is frequently too soon to obtain clinical results, and that reference strain did yield readable inhibition zones in RAST when harvested from BioMérieux BACT/ALERT 3D® bottle cultures. In a wider panel of strains, Gram positives RAST results were very similar to standard AST, while with Gram negative species errors were more frequently observed, limiting clinical implementation.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17843286.2024.2421075
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3120595489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3120595489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1025-e27886babb0a1482c7c7e6af7b8a671c40e9151abfaa01bf9de9a2b5636595a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kctOwzAQRS0EolXpJ4C8ZJPiR5w4y6oqDwmJBS3baJw4yMiJg-0gdc-Hk6gts5lZnDujOxehW0pWlEjyQHOZciazFSMsXbGUUZKLCzRnrBAJ5zy_RPOJSSZohpYhfJGxeJFmnF2j2TgIIqWYo98PsKaGaFyHXYO3-836fYc99KbG0EXTmso7ZcDiMIRK99EoY0084KhDNN0nro3XVbQH3HjX4t4FE82Pxso6V-NqsHHwOmDTYcCd6xIYomsh6hpbUDjoOC25QVcN2KCXp75A-8ftbvOcvL49vWzWr0lFCROJZrmUmQKlCNBUsiqvcp1BkysJWU6rlOiCCgqqASBUNUWtC2BKZDwThYCML9D9cW_v3fcwGihbM5qyFjrthlByyshIprIYUXFER_sheN2UvTct-ENJSTllUJ4zKKcMylMGo-7udGJQra7_VeeP8z-bw4Qu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3120595489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures in a non-automated lab setting</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Strubbe, Gregory ; Van Honacker, Eveline ; Vandendriessche, Stien ; Messiaen, Anne-Sophie ; Verhasselt, Bruno ; Boelens, Jerina</creator><creatorcontrib>Strubbe, Gregory ; Van Honacker, Eveline ; Vandendriessche, Stien ; Messiaen, Anne-Sophie ; Verhasselt, Bruno ; Boelens, Jerina</creatorcontrib><description>To speed up antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) proposed rapid AST (RAST), a disk diffusion method to be read after 4, 6 and 8 hours of incubation. We investigated the feasibility of implementation of RAST in a non-automated lab setting. To this end, reference strains as well as a variety of clinical and resistant strains were used to spike sterile hemocultures (BioMérieux BACT/ALERT 3D® and Becton Dickinson BACTEC FX® systems), followed by RAST in comparison to classical long-incubation AST. Our results with reference strains show that reading RAST after 4 hours is frequently too soon to obtain clinical results, and that reference strain did yield readable inhibition zones in RAST when harvested from BioMérieux BACT/ALERT 3D® bottle cultures. In a wider panel of strains, Gram positives RAST results were very similar to standard AST, while with Gram negative species errors were more frequently observed, limiting clinical implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1784-3286</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2295-3337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2295-3337</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2024.2421075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39450885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Acta clinica belgica (English ed. Online), 2024-10, p.1-8</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1025-e27886babb0a1482c7c7e6af7b8a671c40e9151abfaa01bf9de9a2b5636595a63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2282-8194 ; 0000-0001-6104-9340</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39450885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strubbe, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Honacker, Eveline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandendriessche, Stien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messiaen, Anne-Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhasselt, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boelens, Jerina</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures in a non-automated lab setting</title><title>Acta clinica belgica (English ed. Online)</title><addtitle>Acta Clin Belg</addtitle><description>To speed up antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) proposed rapid AST (RAST), a disk diffusion method to be read after 4, 6 and 8 hours of incubation. We investigated the feasibility of implementation of RAST in a non-automated lab setting. To this end, reference strains as well as a variety of clinical and resistant strains were used to spike sterile hemocultures (BioMérieux BACT/ALERT 3D® and Becton Dickinson BACTEC FX® systems), followed by RAST in comparison to classical long-incubation AST. Our results with reference strains show that reading RAST after 4 hours is frequently too soon to obtain clinical results, and that reference strain did yield readable inhibition zones in RAST when harvested from BioMérieux BACT/ALERT 3D® bottle cultures. In a wider panel of strains, Gram positives RAST results were very similar to standard AST, while with Gram negative species errors were more frequently observed, limiting clinical implementation.</description><issn>1784-3286</issn><issn>2295-3337</issn><issn>2295-3337</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kctOwzAQRS0EolXpJ4C8ZJPiR5w4y6oqDwmJBS3baJw4yMiJg-0gdc-Hk6gts5lZnDujOxehW0pWlEjyQHOZciazFSMsXbGUUZKLCzRnrBAJ5zy_RPOJSSZohpYhfJGxeJFmnF2j2TgIIqWYo98PsKaGaFyHXYO3-836fYc99KbG0EXTmso7ZcDiMIRK99EoY0084KhDNN0nro3XVbQH3HjX4t4FE82Pxso6V-NqsHHwOmDTYcCd6xIYomsh6hpbUDjoOC25QVcN2KCXp75A-8ftbvOcvL49vWzWr0lFCROJZrmUmQKlCNBUsiqvcp1BkysJWU6rlOiCCgqqASBUNUWtC2BKZDwThYCML9D9cW_v3fcwGihbM5qyFjrthlByyshIprIYUXFER_sheN2UvTct-ENJSTllUJ4zKKcMylMGo-7udGJQra7_VeeP8z-bw4Qu</recordid><startdate>20241025</startdate><enddate>20241025</enddate><creator>Strubbe, Gregory</creator><creator>Van Honacker, Eveline</creator><creator>Vandendriessche, Stien</creator><creator>Messiaen, Anne-Sophie</creator><creator>Verhasselt, Bruno</creator><creator>Boelens, Jerina</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2282-8194</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-9340</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241025</creationdate><title>Validation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures in a non-automated lab setting</title><author>Strubbe, Gregory ; Van Honacker, Eveline ; Vandendriessche, Stien ; Messiaen, Anne-Sophie ; Verhasselt, Bruno ; Boelens, Jerina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1025-e27886babb0a1482c7c7e6af7b8a671c40e9151abfaa01bf9de9a2b5636595a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strubbe, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Honacker, Eveline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandendriessche, Stien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messiaen, Anne-Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhasselt, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boelens, Jerina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta clinica belgica (English ed. Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strubbe, Gregory</au><au>Van Honacker, Eveline</au><au>Vandendriessche, Stien</au><au>Messiaen, Anne-Sophie</au><au>Verhasselt, Bruno</au><au>Boelens, Jerina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures in a non-automated lab setting</atitle><jtitle>Acta clinica belgica (English ed. Online)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Clin Belg</addtitle><date>2024-10-25</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>1784-3286</issn><issn>2295-3337</issn><eissn>2295-3337</eissn><abstract>To speed up antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) proposed rapid AST (RAST), a disk diffusion method to be read after 4, 6 and 8 hours of incubation. We investigated the feasibility of implementation of RAST in a non-automated lab setting. To this end, reference strains as well as a variety of clinical and resistant strains were used to spike sterile hemocultures (BioMérieux BACT/ALERT 3D® and Becton Dickinson BACTEC FX® systems), followed by RAST in comparison to classical long-incubation AST. Our results with reference strains show that reading RAST after 4 hours is frequently too soon to obtain clinical results, and that reference strain did yield readable inhibition zones in RAST when harvested from BioMérieux BACT/ALERT 3D® bottle cultures. In a wider panel of strains, Gram positives RAST results were very similar to standard AST, while with Gram negative species errors were more frequently observed, limiting clinical implementation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39450885</pmid><doi>10.1080/17843286.2024.2421075</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2282-8194</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-9340</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1784-3286
ispartof Acta clinica belgica (English ed. Online), 2024-10, p.1-8
issn 1784-3286
2295-3337
2295-3337
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3120595489
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
title Validation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures in a non-automated lab setting
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A08%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20EUCAST%20rapid%20antimicrobial%20susceptibility%20testing%20directly%20from%20positive%20blood%20cultures%20in%20a%20non-automated%20lab%20setting&rft.jtitle=Acta%20clinica%20belgica%20(English%20ed.%20Online)&rft.au=Strubbe,%20Gregory&rft.date=2024-10-25&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=1784-3286&rft.eissn=2295-3337&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17843286.2024.2421075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3120595489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1025-e27886babb0a1482c7c7e6af7b8a671c40e9151abfaa01bf9de9a2b5636595a63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3120595489&rft_id=info:pmid/39450885&rfr_iscdi=true