Loading…

Visit‐to‐visit HbA1c variability and risk of potentially avoidable hospitalisations in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving outpatient care at a tertiary hospital

Aims This study aims to investigate the relationship between long‐term visit‐to‐visit within‐person HbA1c variability and hospitalisation outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods We conducted a cohort study at a tertiary hospital in Singapore involving people aged 21 to 101 years with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2025-01, Vol.27 (1), p.357-367
Main Authors: Htun, Htet Lin, Lian, Weixiang, Phua, Hwee Pin, Lim, Moses Yidong, Chew, Daniel Ek Kwang, Quek, Timothy Peng Lim, Lim, Wei‐Yen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims This study aims to investigate the relationship between long‐term visit‐to‐visit within‐person HbA1c variability and hospitalisation outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods We conducted a cohort study at a tertiary hospital in Singapore involving people aged 21 to 101 years with T2D who had ≥3 HbA1c tests over 2 years. HbA1c variability was assessed using coefficient of variation (CV), variability independent of the mean (VIM) and HbA1c variability score (HVS). A 1‐year follow‐up was performed after the last HbA1c measurement to identify all‐cause and potentially avoidable hospitalisations (PAH), categorised as overall, acute, chronic and diabetes composites. Results The study included 14 923 patients (mean age: 62.9 ± 12.9 years; 55% male). The median HbA1c variability was 8.6% CV (IQR: 5.1–14.3). Higher quartiles of HbA1c variability were associated with greater risks of PAH and all‐cause hospitalisations, independent of glycaemic control. Compared to Q1, for example, the risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals for diabetes‐related PAH based on HbA1c CV were as follows: Q2, 1.32 (0.93–1.88); Q3, 1.65 (1.18–2.31) and Q4, 2.16 (1.54–3.03). For all‐cause hospitalisations, they were as follows: Q2, 0.97 (0.90–1.05); Q3, 1.08 (1.00–1.17) and Q4, 1.16 (1.07–1.26). When stratified by glycaemic control, elevated risk of PAH persisted even in those with optimal glycaemic control. Consistent findings were observed using HbA1c VIM and HVS measures. Conclusions In individuals receiving care at specialist outpatient clinics of a tertiary hospital, HbA1c variability is associated with a higher risk of PAH. Comprehensive diabetes management strategies addressing both glycaemic control and variability may offer benefits.
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.16026